Wáng Yì Xiáng J, Tang Sheng-Nan, Leung Jason C S, Li Cai-Ying, Kwok Anthony W L, Kwok Timothy C Y
Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.
JC Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):786-800. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-430. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
Chinese are known to have a lower vertebral fragility fracture risk than Caucasians. This study evaluates radiographic osteoporotic-like vertebral fractural deformity (OLVF) prevalence and severity among Chinese, Thai, Indonesian women and men.
In an epidemiological study with community subjects, spine radiographs (T4-L5) were sampled for 195 Thai women (mean: 73.6 years), 202 Thai men (mean: 73.7 years), 236 Indonesian women (mean: 70.4 years), and 174 Indonesian men (mean: 70.2 years). Spine radiographs of age-matched subjects were also sampled for Chinese. OLVF classification included no OLVF (grade 0), and OLVFs with <20% (grade 0.5, minimal grade), ≥20-25% (grade 1, mild grade), ≥25%-1/3 (grade 1.5, moderate grade), ≥1/3-40% (grade 2, marked grade), ≥40%-2/3 (grade 2.5, severe grade), and ≥2/3 height loss (grade 3, collapsed grade). OLVF sum score (OLVFss) was calculated with each vertebra assigned a score of 0, -0.5, -1, -1.5, -2, -2.5, and -3 for no OLVF or OLVF grades 0.5-3. Osteoporosis prevalences were estimated based on OLVFss. For a woman, OLVFss ≤-1.0 and OLVFss ≤-1.5 were the thresholds to classify the case being osteoporotic according to the lowest T-score or femoral neck T-score respectively. For men, these thresholds were OLVFss ≤-2.5 and OLVFss ≤-3.0.
Compared with Southeast Asians, Chinese had overall higher prevalences of all-inclusive OLVF, apparent OLVF, and OLVF among Chinese were more likely to be multiple. A trend was noted that Chinese women were more likely to have severe and collapsed grades OLVFs than Southeast Asian women, while such a trend was not noted for Chinese men Southeast Asian men comparison. For men, the Chinese Southeast Asians difference was that Chinese had a higher prevalence of milder OLVFs. For the Thais Indonesians comparison, OLVFss (mean ± standard deviation) was -0.62±1.43 for Thai men, -0.47±0.98 for Indonesian men, -0.82±2.39 for Thai women, and -0.76±2.18 for Indonesian women. The lowest T-score based osteoporosis prevalence and femoral neck T-score based osteoporosis prevalence was 9.4% and 6.9% respectively for Thai men, and 6.9% and 2.9% for respectively Indonesian men; 19.5% and 14.9% respectively for Thai women, 18.9% and 14.5% respectively for Indonesian women.
The prevalence and severity of radiographic OLVF show a weak trend of 'Chinese > Thais > Indonesians', both for older women and for older men. The results of the current study support the notion that 'populations from a warmer climate have better spine health'.
众所周知,中国人椎体脆性骨折风险低于高加索人。本研究评估了中国、泰国、印度尼西亚的女性和男性中骨质疏松样椎体骨折畸形(OLVF)的影像学患病率及严重程度。
在一项针对社区受试者的流行病学研究中,采集了195名泰国女性(平均年龄:73.6岁)、202名泰国男性(平均年龄:73.7岁)、236名印度尼西亚女性(平均年龄:70.4岁)和174名印度尼西亚男性(平均年龄:70.2岁)的脊柱X线片(T4 - L5)。还采集了年龄匹配的中国受试者的脊柱X线片。OLVF分类包括无OLVF(0级),以及OLVF<20%(0.5级,最低级)、≥20% - 25%(1级,轻度)、≥25% - 1/3(1.5级,中度)、≥1/3 - 40%(2级,明显)、≥40% - 2/3(2.5级,重度)和≥2/3高度丢失(3级,塌陷)。计算OLVF总分(OLVFss),每个椎体根据无OLVF或OLVF 0.5 - 3级分别赋值为0、 - 0.5、 - 1、 - 1.5、 - 2、 - 2.5和 - 3。根据OLVFss估算骨质疏松患病率。对于女性,根据最低T值或股骨颈T值,OLVFss≤ - 1.0和OLVFss≤ - 1.5分别为诊断骨质疏松的阈值。对于男性,这些阈值分别为OLVFss≤ - 2.5和OLVFss≤ - 3.0。
与东南亚人相比,中国人总体上全包含OLVF、明显OLVF的患病率更高,且中国人的OLVF更可能是多发的。有一个趋势是,中国女性比东南亚女性更易出现重度和塌陷级OLVF,而中国男性与东南亚男性比较未发现此趋势。对于男性,中国与东南亚人的差异在于中国人轻度OLVF的患病率更高。泰国人与印度尼西亚人的比较中,泰国男性的OLVFss(均值±标准差)为 - 0.62±1.43,印度尼西亚男性为 - 0.47±0.98,泰国女性为 - 0.82±2.39,印度尼西亚女性为 - 0.76±2.18。基于最低T值的骨质疏松患病率和基于股骨颈T值的骨质疏松患病率,泰国男性分别为9.4%和6.9%,印度尼西亚男性分别为6.9%和2.9%;泰国女性分别为19.5%和14.9%,印度尼西亚女性分别为18.9%和14.5%。
影像学OLVF的患病率和严重程度在老年女性和老年男性中均呈现“中国人>泰国人>印度尼西亚人”的微弱趋势。本研究结果支持“来自气候较温暖地区的人群脊柱健康状况更好”这一观点。