Ren Sangsang, Zhan Hong, Fernando Asanga, Xu Xiangrong, Lu Weiguo
College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Gynecology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 7;11:1498393. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1498393. eCollection 2024.
Supervised Teaching Clinics (STCs) have emerged as an innovative approach to medical education, particularly in specialties like gynecology, where hands-on experience is crucial. Traditional clinical rotations often leave students in passive roles, limiting their active participation and the development of essential clinical skills.
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of STCs on the clinical competencies and professional development of medical students within a gynecological clinic, comparing the outcomes with those of traditional clinic shadowing.
A total of 144 fifth-year medical students were randomly assigned to either a control group, which participated in traditional clinic shadowing, or an STC group, which engaged in both shadowing and supervised teaching activities. The study utilized the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) to assess clinical performance. Feedback was also collected from students, tutors, and patients to gage satisfaction and perceived effectiveness.
Students in the STC group demonstrated significantly higher improvements in clinical skills, particularly in medical interviewing, counseling, and overall clinical competence, compared to the control group. The STC group also reported greater satisfaction with their learning experience, citing enhanced confidence and a deeper understanding of gynecological practice. Tutors and patients provided positive feedback, noting the STC's role in fostering effective student-patient interactions and comprehensive learning.
The structured design of the STC, with a focus on goal direction, relationships, and supporting services, significantly improved educational outcomes in gynecology. By fostering active learning and delivering constructive feedback, STCs effectively enhance students' clinical competencies and professional development. The study suggests that integrating STCs into traditional clinical education models could substantially optimize medical training.
督导教学诊所(STCs)已成为医学教育的一种创新方法,尤其是在妇科等专业领域,实践经验至关重要。传统的临床轮转往往使学生处于被动角色,限制了他们的积极参与以及基本临床技能的发展。
本研究旨在评估督导教学诊所在妇科诊所中对医学生临床能力和专业发展的影响,并将结果与传统临床见习进行比较。
总共144名五年级医学生被随机分配到对照组(参与传统临床见习)或督导教学诊所组(参与见习和督导教学活动)。该研究使用一般自我效能量表(GSES)和迷你临床评估练习(mini-CEX)来评估临床绩效。还收集了学生、导师和患者的反馈,以衡量满意度和感知效果。
与对照组相比,督导教学诊所组的学生在临床技能方面有显著更高的提升,尤其是在医学问诊、咨询和整体临床能力方面。督导教学诊所组对其学习经历也表示更满意,称信心增强且对妇科实践有更深入的理解。导师和患者提供了积极反馈,指出督导教学诊所在促进有效的医患互动和全面学习方面的作用。
督导教学诊所的结构化设计,注重目标导向、人际关系和支持服务,显著改善了妇科的教育成果。通过促进主动学习并提供建设性反馈,督导教学诊所有效地提高了学生的临床能力和专业发展。该研究表明,将督导教学诊所纳入传统临床教育模式可大幅优化医学培训。