• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术后手术不良事件的预测与分层:一项双中心回顾性研究。

Prediction and stratification for the surgical adverse events after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A two-center retrospective study.

作者信息

Zhong Qi-Hong, Huang Jiang-Shan, Guo Fei-Long, Wu Jing-Yu, Yuan Mao-Xiu, Zhu Jia-Fu, Lin Wen-Wei, Chen Sui, Zhang Zhen-Yang, Lin Jiang-Bo

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China.

The Graduate School, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 21;31(3):101041. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.101041.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.101041
PMID:39839907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a widely accepted treatment for esophageal cancer, yet it is associated with a significant risk of surgical adverse events (SAEs), which can compromise patient recovery and long-term survival. Accurate preoperative identification of high-risk patients is critical for improving outcomes.

AIM

To establish and validate a risk prediction and stratification model for the risk of SAEs in patients with MIE.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 747 patients who underwent MIE at two centers from January 2019 to February 2024. Patients were separated into a train set ( = 549) and a validation set ( = 198). After screening by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, multivariate logistic regression analyzed clinical and intraoperative variables to identify independent risk factors for SAEs. A risk stratification model was constructed and validated to predict the probability of SAEs.

RESULTS

SAEs occurred in 10.2% of patients in train set and 13.6% in the validation set. Patients with SAE had significantly higher complication rate and a longer hospital stay after surgery. The key independent risk factors identified included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of alcohol consumption, low forced expiratory volume in the first second, and low albumin levels. The stratification model has excellent prediction accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.889 for the training set and an area under the curve of 0.793 for the validation set.

CONCLUSION

The developed risk stratification model effectively predicts the risk of SAEs in patients undergoing MIE, facilitating targeted preoperative interventions and improving perioperative management.

摘要

背景

微创食管切除术(MIE)是一种被广泛接受的食管癌治疗方法,但它与手术不良事件(SAEs)的显著风险相关,这可能会影响患者的恢复和长期生存。准确术前识别高危患者对于改善治疗结果至关重要。

目的

建立并验证MIE患者SAEs风险的预测和分层模型。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2019年1月至2024年2月在两个中心接受MIE的747例患者。患者被分为训练集(n = 549)和验证集(n = 198)。经过最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归筛选后,多因素逻辑回归分析临床和术中变量以确定SAEs的独立危险因素。构建并验证了一个风险分层模型以预测SAEs的概率。

结果

训练集中10.2%的患者发生了SAEs,验证集中为13.6%。发生SAEs的患者术后并发症发生率显著更高,住院时间更长。确定的关键独立危险因素包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病、饮酒史、第一秒用力呼气量低和白蛋白水平低。分层模型具有出色的预测准确性,训练集的曲线下面积为0.889,验证集的曲线下面积为0.793。

结论

所建立的风险分层模型能有效预测接受MIE患者的SAEs风险,有助于进行有针对性的术前干预并改善围手术期管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/d52efbced66e/101041-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/a8af20542159/101041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/ff7cc585488c/101041-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/f9c134d03733/101041-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/52a393e40fd3/101041-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/9ac67a9392a6/101041-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/728a739f4fc7/101041-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/d52efbced66e/101041-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/a8af20542159/101041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/ff7cc585488c/101041-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/f9c134d03733/101041-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/52a393e40fd3/101041-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/9ac67a9392a6/101041-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/728a739f4fc7/101041-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f102/11684167/d52efbced66e/101041-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction and stratification for the surgical adverse events after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A two-center retrospective study.微创食管切除术后手术不良事件的预测与分层:一项双中心回顾性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 21;31(3):101041. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.101041.
2
Impact of postoperative depression and immune-inflammatory biomarkers on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer receiving minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study based on a Chinese population.术后抑郁及免疫炎症生物标志物对接受微创食管癌切除术患者预后的影响:一项基于中国人群的回顾性队列研究
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 6;16:1610267. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1610267. eCollection 2025.
3
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗癌症的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):121-33.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.食管癌切除术微创与开放手术对比:文献系统综述
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):135-46.
6
Prophylactic antibiotics for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者的预防性抗生素治疗:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1(1):CD013198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013198.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Prophylactic endoscopic pylorus dilatation prior to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer to prevent delayed gastric emptying, study protocol for a placebo-controlled randomized trial (PROPPER trial).食管癌切除术前预防性内镜下幽门扩张以预防胃排空延迟,一项安慰剂对照随机试验的研究方案(PROPPER试验)
Trials. 2025 Jun 23;26(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08912-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards personalized care in minimally invasive esophageal surgery: An adverse events prediction model.迈向微创食管手术的个性化护理:不良事件预测模型。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 7;31(13):104205. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i13.104205.
2
Risk and management of adverse events in minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术不良事件的风险与管理
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):103941. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.103941.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Perioperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.微创食管切除术后肺部并发症的围手术期危险因素
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Feb 15;17:567-577. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S449530. eCollection 2024.
3
Learning curve in relation to health-related quality of life in long-term, disease free survivors after McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
麦克基翁微创食管切除术长期无病生存者健康相关生活质量的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):671-678. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10553-5. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
Epidemiology of Postoperative Complications After Esophagectomy: Implications for Management.食管癌术后并发症的流行病学:对治疗的启示。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Dec;116(6):1168-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
5
Prediction model using risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy.使用与微创食管切除术后吻合口漏相关危险因素的预测模型。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;39(5):1345-1349. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.5.8050.
6
Clinical Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.食管癌患者术后加速康复的临床影响。
Anticancer Res. 2023 Sep;43(9):4197-4205. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16611.
7
Concurrent radiotherapy cannot provide superiority of surgical oncological outcome and long-term survival rate in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy.新辅助化疗联合微创手术治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌患者中,同期放化疗并不能提高手术肿瘤学结局和长期生存率。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7073-7082. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10203-w. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
8
Prediction of postoperative complications after oesophagectomy using machine-learning methods.应用机器学习方法预测食管癌手术后并发症。
Br J Surg. 2023 Sep 6;110(10):1361-1366. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad181.
9
Usefulness of Nutrition and Inflammation Assessment Tools in Esophageal Cancer Treatment.营养与炎症评估工具在食管癌治疗中的应用。
In Vivo. 2023 Jan-Feb;37(1):22-35. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13051.
10
The association between postoperative complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study.食管癌切除术后并发症与长期生存的关系:一项多中心队列研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2023 May 27;36(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac086.