• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Analysis of drug pricing drivers under South Korea's pharmaco-economic evaluation exemption policy (2015-2022).韩国药物经济学评估豁免政策(2015 - 2022年)下的药品定价驱动因素分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1519491. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1519491. eCollection 2024.
2
Variables affecting new drug prices in South Korea's pricing system.韩国定价体系中影响新药价格的变量。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 9;15:1370915. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1370915. eCollection 2024.
3
An Industry Survey on Unmet Needs in South Korea's New Drug Listing System.韩国新药上市制度中未满足需求的行业调查
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):759-768. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00531-3. Epub 2023 May 14.
4
Improving the Reimbursement Process for New Drugs: A Case Study of a Two-Waiver System in South Korea.改善新药报销流程:以韩国的双豁免制度为例
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70074. doi: 10.1111/jep.70074.
5
Value-Based Pricing and Budget Impact Analysis for Multi-Indication Drugs: A Case Study of Immunotherapies.基于价值的定价和多适应症药物的预算影响分析:免疫疗法案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4105. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074105.
6
The impact of South Korea's new drug-pricing policy on market competition among off-patent drugs.韩国新药定价政策对专利过期药物市场竞争的影响。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(6):1007-14. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.1083425. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
7
Price increase negotiations to address drug shortages in South Korea's national health insurance.韩国国民健康保险中关于解决药品短缺问题的提价谈判。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 4;14:1307462. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1307462. eCollection 2023.
8
How can we improve patients' access to new drugs under uncertainties? : South Korea's experience with risk sharing arrangements.在不确定的情况下,我们如何提高患者获得新药的机会?:韩国风险分担安排的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06919-x.
9
Trends in the pricing and reimbursement of new anticancer drugs in South Korea: an analysis of listed anticancer drugs during the past three years.韩国新型抗癌药物的定价和报销趋势:过去三年上市抗癌药物的分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):479-488. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1860023. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
10
Pharmacoeconomic guidelines and their implementation in the positive list system in South Korea.韩国药品经济指南及其在正面清单制度中的实施。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12 Suppl 3:S36-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00625.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Public perceptions of high-cost cancer drugs and the implications for reimbursement decisions.公众对高成本抗癌药物的认知及其对报销决策的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00659-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The Health Benefits, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness of Ultraorphan Drugs.超罕用药的健康效益、成本及成本效益分析
Value Health. 2024 Dec;27(12):1656-1661. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.005. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Balancing medical innovation and affordability in the new healthcare ecosystem in China: Review of pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement policies.平衡中国新医疗生态系统中的医疗创新与可负担性:药品定价与报销政策综述
Health Care Sci. 2023 Dec 11;2(6):381-391. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.76. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
New Anticancer Drugs: Reliably Assessing "Value" While Addressing High Prices.新型抗癌药物:在解决高价问题的同时,可靠地评估“价值”。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 28;31(5):2453-2480. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050184.
4
List prices and clinical value of anticancer drugs in China, Japan, and South Korea: a retrospective comparative study.中国、日本和韩国抗癌药物的标价与临床价值:一项回顾性比较研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 May 16;47:101088. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101088. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Towards ethical drug pricing: the European Orphan Genomic Therapies Fund.迈向伦理药物定价:欧洲孤儿基因组治疗基金。
Gene Ther. 2024 Jul;31(7-8):353-357. doi: 10.1038/s41434-024-00452-2. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
6
Access to innovation through clinical trials and the national early access program for patients with lung cancer in France: focus on atezolizumab and durvalumab.通过临床试验及法国肺癌患者国家早期获取计划获取创新药物:聚焦阿替利珠单抗和度伐鲁单抗。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;92(3):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s00280-023-04556-1. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
An Industry Survey on Unmet Needs in South Korea's New Drug Listing System.韩国新药上市制度中未满足需求的行业调查
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):759-768. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00531-3. Epub 2023 May 14.
8
Effect of the copayment reduction system on accessibility to orphan drugs in South Korea.韩国共付减免制度对罕见病药物可及性的影响。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jun;23(5):519-525. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2192481. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
The Evolution of AIFA Registries to Support Managed Entry Agreements for Orphan Medicinal Products in Italy.意大利药品审评局(AIFA)注册系统的演变,以支持孤儿药品的有条件批准协议。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 10;12:699466. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.699466. eCollection 2021.
10
Trends in the pricing and reimbursement of new anticancer drugs in South Korea: an analysis of listed anticancer drugs during the past three years.韩国新型抗癌药物的定价和报销趋势:过去三年上市抗癌药物的分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):479-488. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1860023. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

韩国药物经济学评估豁免政策(2015 - 2022年)下的药品定价驱动因素分析

Analysis of drug pricing drivers under South Korea's pharmaco-economic evaluation exemption policy (2015-2022).

作者信息

Yu Seung Rae, Lee Jong Hyuk

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Dong-Duk Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1519491. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1519491. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1519491
PMID:39840116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11746112/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study analysed the characteristics of new drugs listed under the pharmaco-economic evaluation exemption (PEE) system from 2015 to 2022 in South Korea and examined the factors influencing the pricing decisions under this system.

METHODS

A mixed-methods statistical approach was used to comprehensively evaluate the factors influencing drug pricing under PEE system. Descriptive statistics provide an overview of the dataset, while inferential statistics, including t-tests and Pearson's correlation analyses, are used to explore variable associations. Multiple and hierarchical regression models identify and quantify the key determinants of drug prices, controlling for multicollinearity among the variables.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2022, 30 new drugs were listed under the PEE system. The average annual number of new drugs was four, but this figure significantly increased to eight in 2022. The "KOR/A7 lowest" variable exhibited a strong negative correlation with the budget impact variable (coefficient: 0.838, < 0.001), indicating that drugs with higher budget impact tend to have lower prices compared to the A7 countrie's lowest price.

CONCLUSION

Since the introduction of the PEE system in South Korea, patient access to new drugs has significantly improved. However, the rising expenditure on pharmaceuticals has made budget impact a significant consideration in pricing decisions, highlighting the need for ongoing monitoring of drug expenditure by payers. As the system evolves, enhanced oversight and policy adjustments will be crucial for balancing cost containment with equitable patient access. Developing tiered RSA models based on drug classification or therapeutic impact could be a viable approach to achieving this balance.

摘要

目的

本研究分析了2015年至2022年韩国药物经济学评估豁免(PEE)制度下列出的新药特征,并考察了该制度下影响定价决策的因素。

方法

采用混合方法统计方法全面评估PEE制度下影响药品定价的因素。描述性统计提供数据集的概述,而包括t检验和Pearson相关分析在内的推断性统计用于探索变量关联。多元和分层回归模型识别并量化药品价格的关键决定因素,控制变量间的多重共线性。

结果

2015年至2022年,PEE制度下列出了30种新药。新药的年均数量为4种,但这一数字在2022年显著增加至8种。“KOR/A7最低”变量与预算影响变量呈强负相关(系数:0.838,<0.001),表明与A7国家的最低价格相比,预算影响较高的药品往往价格较低。

结论

自韩国引入PEE制度以来,患者获得新药的机会显著改善。然而,药品支出的不断增加使预算影响成为定价决策中的一个重要考虑因素,凸显了支付方持续监测药品支出的必要性。随着该制度的发展,加强监督和政策调整对于平衡成本控制与公平的患者可及性至关重要。基于药物分类或治疗影响开发分层的RSA模型可能是实现这一平衡的可行方法。