Volleberg Rick H J A, Rroku Andi, Mol Jan-Quinten, Hermanides Renicus S, van Leeuwen Maarten, Berta Balázs, Meuwissen Martijn, Alfonso Fernando, Wojakowski Wojciech, Belkacemi Anouar, Roleder Tomasz, Kedhi Elvin, van Royen Niels
Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.H.J.A.V., J.-Q.M., N.v.R.).
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Campus Benjamin Franklin), Germany (A.R.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;18(2):e014667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014667. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
Despite fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization, recurrent events in patients with diabetes or after myocardial infarction remain common. This study aimed to assess the association between FFR-negative but high-risk nonculprit lesions and clinical outcomes.
This is a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective natural-history COMBINE (OCT-FFR) study (Optical Coherence Tomography Morphologic and Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment in Diabetes Mellitus Patients) and PECTUS-obs study (Identification of Risk Factors for Acute Coronary Events by OCT After STEMI and NSTEMI Patients With Residual Non- Flow Limiting Lesions). Optical coherence tomography was performed on all FFR-negative (FFR >0.80) native nonculprit lesions. Patients or lesions with a high-risk plaque were compared with those without a high-risk plaque. A high-risk plaque was defined in the presence of at least 2 prespecified criteria: (1) lipid arc ≥90, (2) minimum fibrous cap thickness <65 µm, and (3) presence of either plaque rupture or thrombus. The primary end points were native major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization excluding stent-failure-related events and nonattributable events) and target lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization).
Among 810 patients, 450 (55.6%) had a history of diabetes and 482 (59.5%) presented with myocardial infarction. At least 1 high-risk plaque was identified in 271 (33.5%) patients and 287 (30.6%) lesions. Over a median follow-up of 761 (interquartile range, 731-1175) days, the presence of a high-risk plaque was associated with patient-level native major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.127 [95% CI, 1.451-3.120]; <0.001) and lesion-level target lesion failure (hazard ratio, 2.623 [95% CI, 1.559-4.414]; <0.001). The risk of adverse outcomes increased with the copresence of multiple high-risk features.
FFR-negative but high-risk nonculprit lesions are associated with adverse patient- and lesion-level clinical outcomes. These findings emphasize the additional value of intracoronary imaging in patients with FFR-negative nonculprit lesions.
URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02989740; Unique identifier: NCT03857971.
尽管采用了基于血流储备分数(FFR)指导的血运重建延迟策略,但糖尿病患者或心肌梗死后患者的复发事件仍然很常见。本研究旨在评估FFR阴性但高危的非罪犯病变与临床结局之间的关联。
这是一项对前瞻性自然史COMBINE(OCT-FFR)研究(糖尿病患者的光学相干断层扫描形态学和血流储备分数评估)和PECTUS-obs研究(STEMI和NSTEMI后残留无血流限制病变患者通过OCT识别急性冠状动脉事件的危险因素)进行的患者水平汇总分析。对所有FFR阴性(FFR>0.80)的原位非罪犯病变进行光学相干断层扫描。将有高危斑块的患者或病变与没有高危斑块的患者或病变进行比较。高危斑块定义为存在至少2项预先设定的标准:(1)脂质弧≥90,(2)最小纤维帽厚度<65μm,以及(3)存在斑块破裂或血栓。主要终点是原位主要不良心血管事件(全因死亡、非致命性心肌梗死或计划外血运重建的复合终点,不包括支架失败相关事件和不可归因事件)和靶病变失败(心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建的复合终点)。
在810例患者中,450例(55.6%)有糖尿病病史,482例(59.5%)有心肌梗死病史。在271例(33.5%)患者和287例(30.6%)病变中识别出至少1个高危斑块。在中位随访761(四分位间距,731-1175)天期间,高危斑块的存在与患者水平的原位主要不良心血管事件相关(风险比,2.127[95%CI,1.451-3.120];P<0.001)和病变水平的靶病变失败相关(风险比,2.623[95%CI,1.559-4.414];P<0.001)。不良结局的风险随着多个高危特征的共同存在而增加。
FFR阴性但高危的非罪犯病变与不良的患者和病变水平临床结局相关。这些发现强调了冠状动脉内成像在FFR阴性非罪犯病变患者中的附加价值。
网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02989740;唯一标识符:NCT0385797