• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死中非罪犯易损斑块与预后:PROSPECT II子研究

Nonculprit Vulnerable Plaques and Prognosis in Myocardial Infarction With Versus Without ST-Segment Elevation: A PROSPECT II Substudy.

作者信息

Thrane Pernille G, Maeng Michael, Maehara Akiko, Bøtker Hans Erik, Mintz Gary S, Kjøller-Hansen Lars, Engstrøm Thomas, Matsumura Mitsuaki, Kotinkaduwa Lak N, Fröbert Ole, Persson Jonas, Wiseth Rune, Larsen Alf I, Jensen Lisette O, Nordrehaug Jan E, Bleie Øyvind, Held Claes, James Stefan K, Ali Ziad A, Erlinge David, Stone Gregg W

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (P.G.T., M. Maeng, H.E.B.).

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark (P.G.T., M. Maeng, H.E.B., O.F.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2025 Jun 24;151(25):1767-1779. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071980. Epub 2025 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071980
PMID:40549845
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines recommend different revascularization strategies for nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) versus non-STEMI (NSTEMI). Whether the prevalence of untreated high-risk vulnerable plaques differs in STEMI and NSTEMI and affects their outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

In PROSPECT II (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree II), a multicenter, prospective natural history study, patients with recent myocardial infarction underwent 3-vessel coronary angiography with coregistered near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound after successful percutaneous coronary intervention of obstructive lesions from 2014 through 2017. Two-feature high-risk plaques were defined as those with both plaque burden ≥70% and maximum lipid core burden index over any 4-mm segment ≥324.7. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events arising from untreated nonculprit lesions during a median 3.7-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 898 patients, 199 (22.2%) with 849 nonculprit lesions had STEMI and 699 (77.8%) with 2784 nonculprit lesions had NSTEMI. By intravascular ultrasound, the median nonculprit lesion length was 17.4 mm (interquartile range, 16.3-18.5) in STEMI and 17.7 mm (interquartile range, 17.1-18.4) in NSTEMI (=0.63), and the median minimal lumen area was 5.5 mm (interquartile range, 5.3-5.7 mm) in STEMI and 5.5 mm (interquartile range, 5.3-5.6 mm) in NSTEMI (=0.99). At the lesion level, the prevalence of 2-feature high-risk nonobstructive nonculprit plaques was slightly higher in patients with STEMI than in patients with NSTEMI (12.8% versus 10.1%; =0.03). At the patient level, however, the prevalence of 2-feature high-risk plaques was similar in STEMI versus NSTEMI (38.8% versus 32.7%; =0.11). The prevalence of patients with 1 or more lesions meeting at least 1 high-risk plaque criterion was also similar (plaque burden ≥70%, 63.3% versus 57.8% [=0.16]; maximum lipid core burden index over any 4-mm segment ≥324.7, 63.3% versus 57.6% [=0.15]). The 4-year rates of nonculprit lesion-related major adverse cardiovascular events were similar in STEMI versus NSTEMI (8.6% versus 7.8%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.57-1.81]; =0.95), as were the rates of all major adverse cardiovascular events (14.2% versus 13.0%; hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.68-1.64]; =0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

In the PROSPECT II study, the per-patient prevalence of high-risk vulnerable plaques was comparable in STEMI versus NSTEMI, as was the overall long-term incidence of nonculprit lesion-related and all major adverse cardiovascular events. These results support a similar revascularization strategy for nonculprit lesions in patients with STEMI or NSTEMI after culprit lesion management.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02171065.

摘要

背景

临床指南针对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的非罪犯病变推荐了不同的血运重建策略。未经治疗的高危易损斑块在STEMI和NSTEMI中的患病率是否不同以及是否会影响其预后尚不清楚。

方法

在PROSPECT II(提供区域观察以研究冠状动脉树中事件的预测因素II)这一多中心前瞻性自然史研究中,2014年至2017年期间,近期心肌梗死患者在成功对阻塞性病变进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,接受了三支血管冠状动脉造影,并同步进行了近红外光谱和血管内超声检查。具有两个特征的高危斑块定义为斑块负荷≥70%且在任何4毫米节段上的最大脂质核心负荷指数≥324.7的斑块。主要终点是在中位3.7年随访期间未经治疗的非罪犯病变引发的主要不良心血管事件。

结果

898例患者中,199例(22.2%)有849个非罪犯病变的患者发生STEMI,699例(77.8%)有2784个非罪犯病变的患者发生NSTEMI。通过血管内超声检查,STEMI患者非罪犯病变的中位长度为17.4毫米(四分位间距,16.3 - 18.5),NSTEMI患者为17.7毫米(四分位间距,17.1 - 18.4)(P = 0.63);STEMI患者的中位最小管腔面积为5.5平方毫米(四分位间距,5.3 - 5.7平方毫米),NSTEMI患者为5.5平方毫米(四分位间距,5.3 - 5.6平方毫米)(P = 0.99)。在病变层面,具有两个特征的高危非阻塞性非罪犯斑块在STEMI患者中的患病率略高于NSTEMI患者(12.8%对10.1%;P = 0.03)。然而,在患者层面,具有两个特征的高危斑块在STEMI和NSTEMI中的患病率相似(38.8%对32.7%;P = 0.11)。有1个或更多病变符合至少1项高危斑块标准的患者患病率也相似(斑块负荷≥70%,63.3%对57.8% [P = 0.16];在任何4毫米节段上的最大脂质核心负荷指数≥324.7,63.3%对57.6% [P = 0.15])。非罪犯病变相关的主要不良心血管事件的4年发生率在STEMI和NSTEMI中相似(8.6%对7.8%;风险比,1.02 [95% CI,0.57 - 1.81];P = 0.95),所有主要不良心血管事件的发生率也相似(14.2%对13.0%;风险比,1.06 [95% CI,0.68 - 1.64];P = 0.80)。

结论

在PROSPECT II研究中,STEMI和NSTEMI患者中高危易损斑块的患者患病率相当,非罪犯病变相关和所有主要不良心血管事件的总体长期发生率也相当。这些结果支持在处理罪犯病变后,对STEMI或NSTEMI患者的非罪犯病变采用相似的血运重建策略。

注册信息

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02171065。

相似文献

1
Nonculprit Vulnerable Plaques and Prognosis in Myocardial Infarction With Versus Without ST-Segment Elevation: A PROSPECT II Substudy.ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死中非罪犯易损斑块与预后:PROSPECT II子研究
Circulation. 2025 Jun 24;151(25):1767-1779. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071980. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
FFR-Negative Nonculprit High-Risk Plaques and Clinical Outcomes in High-Risk Populations: An Individual Patient-Data Pooled Analysis From COMBINE (OCT-FFR) and PECTUS-obs.高风险人群中血流储备分数阴性的非罪犯高危斑块与临床结局:来自COMBINE(光学相干断层扫描-血流储备分数)和PECTUS-obs的个体患者数据汇总分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;18(2):e014667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014667. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
Nonculprit Lesion Plaque Morphology in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results From the COMPLETE Trial Optical Coherence Tomography Substudys.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者非罪犯病变的斑块形态:COMPLETE试验光学相干断层扫描子研究结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008768. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008768. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Lipoprotein(a), Cholesterol, Triglyceride Levels, and Vulnerable Coronary Plaques: A PROSPECT II Substudy.脂蛋白(a)、胆固醇、甘油三酯水平与易损冠状动脉斑块:PROSPECT II子研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Jun 3;85(21):2011-2024. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.013.
5
FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.FFR 引导的心肌梗死患者完全血运重建或罪犯病变血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 25;390(16):1481-1492. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2314149. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
6
Timing of fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: Rationale and design of the OPTION-STEMI trial.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的血流储备分数指导下完全血运重建的时机:OPTION-STEMI 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2024 Jul;273:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
7
Coronary Artery Lesion Lipid Content and Plaque Burden in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients: PROSPECT II.糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的冠状动脉病变脂质含量与斑块负荷:PROSPECT II研究
Circulation. 2023 Feb 7;147(6):469-481. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061983. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
8
Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi-vessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变时完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 3;5(5):CD011986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011986.pub2.
9
Relationships of hsCRP to High-Risk Vulnerable Plaque After NSTEMI: Insights From the PROSPECT II Trial.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死后高敏C反应蛋白与高危易损斑块的关系:来自PROSPECT II试验的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 May 26;18(10):1217-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.01.440. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
10
Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.即刻与分期完全血运重建治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的比较:一项随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e035535. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035535. Epub 2024 Oct 29.