• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人住院后死亡率预测的沃尔特指数的外部验证

External Validation of the Walter Index for Posthospitalization Mortality Prediction in Older Adults.

作者信息

Avelino-Silva Thiago J, Lee Sei J, Covinsky Kenneth E, Walter Louise C, Deardorff W James, Boscardin John, Campora Flavia, Szlejf Claudia, Suemoto Claudia K, Smith Alexander K

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco.

Laboratorio de Investigacao Medica em Envelhecimento (LIM-66), Servico de Geriatria, Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455475. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55475.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55475
PMID:39841475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11755200/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Walter Index is a widely used prognostic tool for assessing 12-month mortality risk among hospitalized older adults. Developed in the US in 2001, its accuracy in contemporary non-US contexts is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the external validity of the Walter Index in predicting posthospitalization mortality risk in Brazilian older adult inpatients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prognostic study used data from a cohort of adults aged 70 years or older admitted to the geriatric unit of a university hospital in Brazil from January 1, 2009, to February 28, 2020. Participants underwent comprehensive geriatric assessments at admission, were reevaluated at discharge, and were subsequently followed up for 48 months. Data were analyzed from March to July 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The Walter Index, a score based on 6 risk factors (male sex, dependent activities of daily living at discharge, heart failure, cancer, high creatinine level, and low albumin level), was calculated to assess its predictive accuracy for 12-month mortality as well as 6-, 24-, and 48-month mortality. The study investigated whether incorporating delirium, frailty, or C-reactive protein level enhanced accuracy. Performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility measures.

RESULTS

In total, 2780 participants (mean [SD] age, 81 [7] years; 1795 [65%] female) were included, with 89 (3%) lost to follow-up. The 12-month posthospitalization mortality rate was 23% (646 participants). Mortality was 7% (47 of 634) in the lowest-risk group (0-1 point), 17% (111 of 668) for 2 to 3 points, 25% (198 of 803) for 4 to 6 points, and 43% (290 of 675) in the highest-risk group (≥7 points). The index demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.714 (95% CI, 0.691-0.736) for predicting 12-month posthospitalization mortality (AUCs were 0.75 and 0.80 in the original derivation and validation cohorts, respectively). Comparable results were observed for mortality at 6 months (AUC, 0.726; 95% CI, 0.700-0.752), 24 months (AUC, 0.711; 95% CI, 0.691-0.730), and 48 months (AUC, 0.719; 95% CI, 0.700-0.738). Adding delirium modestly increased the index's discrimination (AUC, 0.723; 95% CI, 0.702-0.749); additionally including frailty and C-reactive protein level did not improve discrimination further (AUC, 0.723; 95% CI, 0.701-0.744).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this prognostic study of hospitalized older adults in Brazil, the Walter Index showed similar discrimination in predicting postdischarge mortality as it did 2 decades ago in the US. These findings highlight the need for continuous validation and potential modification of established prognostic tools to improve their applicability across settings.

摘要

重要性

沃尔特指数是一种广泛用于评估住院老年人12个月死亡风险的预后工具。该指数于2001年在美国开发,其在当代非美国背景下的准确性尚不清楚。

目的

评估沃尔特指数在预测巴西老年住院患者出院后死亡风险方面的外部有效性。

设计、设置和参与者:这项预后研究使用了2009年1月1日至2020年2月28日期间入住巴西一家大学医院老年科的70岁及以上成年人队列的数据。参与者在入院时接受了全面的老年评估,出院时进行了重新评估,随后进行了48个月的随访。数据于2024年3月至7月进行分析。

主要结果和指标

计算基于6个风险因素(男性、出院时日常生活依赖、心力衰竭、癌症、高肌酐水平和低白蛋白水平)的沃尔特指数得分,以评估其对12个月死亡率以及6个月、24个月和48个月死亡率的预测准确性。该研究调查了纳入谵妄、衰弱或C反应蛋白水平是否能提高准确性。使用区分度、校准度和临床效用指标评估性能。

结果

总共纳入了2780名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄为81[7]岁;1795名[65%]为女性),其中89名(3%)失访。出院后12个月的死亡率为23%(646名参与者)。最低风险组(0 - 1分)的死亡率为7%(634名中的47名),2至3分的死亡率为17%(668名中的111名),4至6分的死亡率为25%(803名中的198名),最高风险组(≥7分)的死亡率为43%(675名中的290名)。该指数在预测出院后12个月死亡率时的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.714(95%置信区间,0.691 - 0.736)(在原始推导队列和验证队列中的AUC分别为0.75和0.80)。在6个月(AUC,0.726;95%置信区间,0.700 - 0.752)、24个月(AUC,0.711;95%置信区间,0.691 - 0.730)和48个月(AUC,0.719;95%置信区间,0.700 - 0.738)的死亡率方面观察到了类似的结果。加入谵妄适度提高了该指数的区分度(AUC,0.723;95%置信区间,0.702 - 0.749);另外纳入衰弱和C反应蛋白水平并未进一步提高区分度(AUC,0.723;95%置信区间,0.701 - 0.744)。

结论和相关性

在这项针对巴西住院老年人的预后研究中,沃尔特指数在预测出院后死亡率方面显示出与20年前在美国时相似的区分度。这些发现凸显了持续验证和对既定预后工具进行潜在修改以提高其在不同环境中的适用性的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc69/11755200/8f0ee6892a0d/jamanetwopen-e2455475-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc69/11755200/d92cca84b49e/jamanetwopen-e2455475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc69/11755200/8f0ee6892a0d/jamanetwopen-e2455475-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc69/11755200/d92cca84b49e/jamanetwopen-e2455475-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc69/11755200/8f0ee6892a0d/jamanetwopen-e2455475-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
External Validation of the Walter Index for Posthospitalization Mortality Prediction in Older Adults.老年人住院后死亡率预测的沃尔特指数的外部验证
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455475. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55475.
2
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Predicting mortality and intensive care needs in geriatric trauma patients: A ROC analysis of frailty and trauma scoring systems.预测老年创伤患者的死亡率和重症监护需求:脆弱性与创伤评分系统的ROC分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jul 21;51(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02924-5.
6
Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients.急性住院老年医学患者的运动治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 10;11(11):CD005955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005955.pub3.
7
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.生物标志物对改良心脏风险指数在预测非心脏手术患者主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率方面的比较和附加预后价值。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
[Association between obesity and the risk of microvascular complications in Yinzhou District, Ningbo adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus].[宁波鄞州区2型糖尿病成年患者肥胖与微血管并发症风险的相关性]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2025 Jul;54(4):608-620. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.04.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Pulling Back the Curtain on Hospital Dementia Detection: Validation of the Informant-Based Clinical Dementia Rating.揭开医院痴呆症检测的面纱:基于 informant 的临床痴呆评定量表的验证
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Aug;73(8):2524-2530. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19494. Epub 2025 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
2
Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 3): calculating the sample size required for an external validation study.临床预测模型评估(第3部分):计算外部验证研究所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 22;384:e074821. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074821.
3
Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 2): how to undertake an external validation study.
临床预测模型的评估(第 2 部分):如何进行外部验证研究。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 15;384:e074820. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074820.
4
Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation.临床预测模型的评估(第 1 部分):从建立到外部验证。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 8;384:e074819. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074819.
5
Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China.验证和比较中国老年病房中四种死亡率预测模型。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Nov 30;18:2009-2019. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S429769. eCollection 2023.
6
There is no such thing as a validated prediction model.没有经过验证的预测模型这种东西。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 24;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02779-w.
7
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting.靶向验证:在目标人群和环境中验证临床预测模型。
Diagn Progn Res. 2022 Dec 22;6(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00136-8.
8
Comparison of 6 Mortality Risk Scores for Prediction of 1-Year Mortality Risk in Older Adults With Multimorbidity.比较 6 种死亡率评分对预测患有多种疾病的老年人 1 年死亡率风险的作用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2223911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23911.
9
Development and validation of predictive model for long-term hospitalization, readmission, and in-hospital death of patients over 60 years old.建立并验证 60 岁以上患者长期住院、再入院和院内死亡的预测模型。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2022 Jun 17;20:eAO8012. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO8012. eCollection 2022.
10
Kinetics of inflammatory biomarkers to predict one-year mortality in older patients hospitalized for pneumonia: a multivariable analysis.预测因肺炎住院的老年患者一年死亡率的炎症生物标志物的动力学:多变量分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;122:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 9.