Suppr超能文献

将卡立普嗪作为重度抑郁症的一线与后续辅助治疗时的医疗资源利用情况及成本。

Healthcare resource utilization and costs of using cariprazine as the first versus subsequent adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder.

作者信息

Masand Prakash S, Clayton Anita H, Parikh Mousam, Laliberté François, Germain Guillaume, Mahendran Malena, Martinez Cristina, Nabulsi Nadia

机构信息

Academic Medicine Education Institute, Duke‑NUS, Singapore, Singapore.

University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):235-244. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2457872. Epub 2025 Feb 1.

Abstract

AIM

Inadequate response to antidepressant therapy (ADT) is common in major depressive disorder (MDD); atypical antipsychotic (AA) adjunctive therapy may be effective for these patients. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs between patients initiating the AA cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy vs those initiating cariprazine subsequently.

METHODS

The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021) was used to identify US adults with MDD and ≥1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine adjunctive to ADT in 2018 or after. Rates of mental health (MH)‑related and all‑cause HRU per patient-year (PPY) and mean healthcare costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were assessed after patients first initiated adjunctive therapy. HRU and costs were compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) and mean cost differences, respectively, estimated from multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

Of 838 patients receiving cariprazine, 44.7% initiated cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy to ADT, and 55.3% initiated it subsequently. Those initiating cariprazine first had significantly lower rates of MH‑related hospitalizations (RR [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.30, 0.90],  = .020) and outpatient (OP) visits (0.67 [0.57, 0.82],  < .001) PPY than those initiating cariprazine subsequently. Moreover, patients initiating cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy had lower annual total MH‑related healthcare costs (mean cost difference [95% confidence interval] -$2,182 [-$4,206, -$69],  = .040), driven primarily by lower OP visit costs (-$1,511 [-$2,330, -$615],  < .001). Similar trends were observed for all-cause HRU and costs.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective analysis of secondary data with limited follow-up. Claims were a proxy for cariprazine use.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this real‑world study of commercially insured US adults suggest that initiating cariprazine as the first adjunctive therapy rather than a subsequent therapy could help mitigate the considerable economic burden of MDD for appropriate patients.

摘要

目的

在重度抑郁症(MDD)中,对抗抑郁治疗(ADT)反应不足很常见;非典型抗精神病药物(AA)辅助治疗可能对这些患者有效。本研究旨在比较首次将卡立普嗪作为第一种辅助治疗药物起始治疗的患者与随后起始卡立普嗪治疗的患者之间的医疗资源利用(HRU)和成本。

方法

使用Merative MarketScan商业数据库(2015年1月1日至2021年6月30日)来识别2018年及以后患有MDD且有≥1次卡立普嗪辅助ADT药房报销记录的美国成年人。在患者首次开始辅助治疗后,评估每位患者每年(PPY)的心理健康(MH)相关和全因HRU率以及每位患者每年(PPPY)的平均医疗成本。使用多变量回归模型估计的率比(RR)和平均成本差异分别比较队列之间的HRU和成本。

结果

在838例接受卡立普嗪治疗的患者中,44.7%将卡立普嗪作为ADT的第一种辅助治疗起始用药,55.3%随后起始使用。首次起始卡立普嗪治疗的患者与随后起始卡立普嗪治疗的患者相比,PPY的MH相关住院率(RR [95%置信区间] = 0.55 [0.30, 0.90],P = 0.020)和门诊(OP)就诊率(0.67 [0.57, 0.82],P < 0.001)显著更低。此外,首次将卡立普嗪作为辅助治疗起始用药的患者年度MH相关医疗总成本更低(平均成本差异 [95%置信区间] -$2,182 [-$4,206, -$69],P = 0.040),主要由更低的OP就诊成本驱动(-$1,511 [-$2,330, -$615],P < 0.001)。全因HRU和成本也观察到类似趋势。

局限性

这是一项对随访有限的二手数据的回顾性分析。报销记录是卡立普嗪使用情况的替代指标。

结论

这项针对美国商业保险成年人的真实世界研究结果表明,对于合适的患者,将卡立普嗪作为第一种辅助治疗起始用药而非后续治疗用药,可能有助于减轻MDD相当大的经济负担。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验