Suppr超能文献

用于治疗 I 型双相情感障碍的卡利拉嗪首次与后续使用相关的医疗资源利用和成本。

Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with first versus subsequent use of cariprazine for bipolar I disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Lakewood Ranch, FL, USA.

Groupe d'analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1472-1484. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2419721. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of patients who initiated cariprazine as their first versus subsequent atypical antipsychotic (AA) following a bipolar I disorder (BP-I) diagnosis.

METHODS

Adults with a BP-I diagnosis (first claim = index), commercial, Medicare Supplemental, or Medicaid insurance, and ≥1 outpatient cariprazine dispensing were identified from Merative MarketScan database. Cohorts included patients who initiated cariprazine as either their first or subsequent AA after initial BP-I diagnosis. Characteristics were balanced between cohorts using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Outcomes evaluated post-index included all-cause and mental health (MH)-related HRU (hospitalizations, emergency department [ED] visits, outpatient visits), total healthcare costs (medical + pharmacy), and treatment patterns. HRU and healthcare costs were reported per patient-year (PPY) and compared between cohorts using rate ratios and 95% CIs estimated using nonparametric bootstrap procedures. Treatment patterns were analyzed descriptively, with standardized differences ≥10% considered important.

RESULTS

After IPTW, cohorts included 1,409 patients who initiated cariprazine first and 1,621 patients who initiated cariprazine subsequently; the average (standard deviation, SD) observation period was 678 (373) and 758 (389) days for first and subsequent initiators, respectively. Patients who initiated cariprazine first had 23% fewer all-cause hospitalizations and 28% fewer MH-related hospitalizations PPY (each comparison,  < 0.001). Rates of all-cause and MH-related outpatient visits were significantly lower in patients who initiated cariprazine first versus subsequently (each comparison,  < 0.001), while rates of ED visits were similar. Relative to subsequent initiators, first initiators incurred $2,587 and $2,130 lower all-cause and MH-related total healthcare costs PPY, respectively (each comparison,  < 0.05). Before starting cariprazine, first initiators used fewer BP-I-related medications on average than subsequent initiators (2.6 vs 3.9; standardized difference = 23.9%).

LIMITATIONS

Potential coding inaccuracies and residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world database analysis, patients with BP-I who initiated cariprazine as their first AA had lower rates of HRU and incurred lower costs than patients who initiated cariprazine as a subsequent AA.

摘要

目的

评估首发(cariprazine)与后续(非首发)使用卡利拉嗪的双相 I 型障碍(BP-I)患者的医疗资源利用(HRU)和成本。

方法

从 Merative MarketScan 数据库中筛选出符合以下条件的患者:首次诊断为 BP-I(首次就诊=索引)、商业保险、补充医疗保险或医疗补助保险、至少有一次卡利拉嗪的门诊配药。首发与后续队列的入选标准为:首发患者首次使用卡利拉嗪,后续患者在初始 BP-I 诊断后首次使用卡利拉嗪以外的其他非典型抗精神病药物(AA)。使用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)平衡两组间特征。索引后评估的结局包括全因和精神健康(MH)相关 HRU(住院、急诊就诊、门诊就诊)、总医疗保健成本(医疗保健+药物)和治疗模式。以患者每年(PPY)为单位报告 HRU 和医疗保健成本,并使用非参数自举程序估计的率比值和 95%置信区间(CI)比较两组间的差异。使用标准化差异(SD)≥10%的方法对治疗模式进行描述性分析。

结果

经过 IPTW,首发队列包括 1409 例患者,后续队列包括 1621 例患者。首发队列和后续队列的平均(SD)观察期分别为 678(373)和 758(389)天。首发患者的全因住院率和 MH 相关住院率分别低 23%和 28%(每种比较,均<0.001)。首发患者的全因和 MH 相关门诊就诊率显著低于后续患者(每种比较,均<0.001),急诊就诊率相似。与后续患者相比,首发患者的全因和 MH 相关总医疗保健成本分别低 2587 美元和 2130 美元(每种比较,均<0.05)。在开始使用卡利拉嗪之前,首发患者平均使用的 BP-I 相关药物少于后续患者(2.6 种与 3.9 种;SD=23.9%)。

局限性

可能存在编码不准确和残余混杂。

结论

在这项真实世界的数据库分析中,首发使用卡利拉嗪的 BP-I 患者的 HRU 较低,成本较低,而后续使用卡利拉嗪的患者则相反。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验