Xu Qing, Fang Yijiao, Pan Congxia, Gao Lingling, Zhu Yun, Zhang Jun, Zhao Zhanqi, Yang Li
Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Physiol Meas. 2025 Jan 31;13(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/adad2f.
Abnormal regional lung ventilation can lead to undesirable outcomes during the induction of anesthesia. Head rotated ventilation has proven to change the airflow of upper airway tract and be effective in increasing the tidal volume. This study aimed to investigate the influence of head rotated mask ventilation on regional ventilation distribution during the induction phase of anesthesia.Ninety patients undergoing anesthesia induction were randomly assigned to receive either neutral head (neutral-head group) or rotated right side head (rotated-head group) mask ventilation. Pressure-controlled mode was used in all mechanical ventilation. The regional lung ventilation was monitored by electrical impedance tomography. The primary outcome was the ratio of left/right lung ventilation distribution. The secondary outcomes were global inhomogeneity index (GI), center of ventilation (CoV, 100% = entirely dorsal), and the regional lung distribution differences between spontaneous and mask ventilation.Forty-two patients with neutral-head and 38 with rotated-head mask ventilation were analyzed finally. Compared with spontaneous ventilation, mask positive-pressure ventilation caused significant changes in the ratio of left/right lung ventilation distribution [0.85 (0.27) versus 0.94 (0.30);= 0.022]. However, there were no differences in the ratio of left/right lung ventilation distribution between neutral and rotated head groups (= 0.128). When compared with spontaneous ventilation, mask ventilation caused regional distributions of ventilation shifts towards ventral lung areas (CoV: 45.7 ± 5.0% versus 39.2 ± 4.8%;< 0.001), and significant lung ventilation inhomogeneity (GI: 0.40 ± 0.07 versus 0.49 ± 0.14;< 0.001). Compared with neutral-head mask ventilation, rotated-head mask ventilation was associated with higher expiratory tidal volume (TVe) (575.1 ± 148.6 ml versus 654.2 ± 204.0 ml;= 0.049).Mask positive ventilation caused regional lung ventilation changes. When compared with neutral-head mask ventilation, rotated-head mask ventilation did not improve the regional ventilation towards to left lung. However, rotated-head mask ventilation was associated with higher TVe, and has the potential for better oxygenation.This study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 6 August, 2024 (ChiCTR2400087858).
区域肺通气异常可导致麻醉诱导期间出现不良后果。头旋转通气已被证明可改变上呼吸道气流,并有效增加潮气量。本研究旨在探讨头旋转面罩通气在麻醉诱导期对区域通气分布的影响。
90例接受麻醉诱导的患者被随机分配接受中立位头(中立头组)或向右侧旋转头(旋转头组)面罩通气。所有机械通气均采用压力控制模式。采用电阻抗断层扫描监测区域肺通气。主要结局是左右肺通气分布比例。次要结局是整体不均匀性指数(GI)、通气中心(CoV,100% = 完全背侧)以及自主呼吸和面罩通气之间的区域肺分布差异。
最终分析了42例接受中立头面罩通气和38例接受旋转头面罩通气的患者。与自主呼吸相比,面罩正压通气导致左右肺通气分布比例发生显著变化[0.85(0.27)对0.94(0.30);P = 0.022]。然而,中立头组和旋转头组之间的左右肺通气分布比例没有差异(P = 0.128)。与自主呼吸相比,面罩通气导致通气的区域分布向肺腹侧区域转移(CoV:45.7±5.0%对39.2±4.8%;P<0.001),并且肺通气存在显著不均匀性(GI:0.40±0.07对0.49±0.14;P<0.001)。与中立头面罩通气相比,旋转头面罩通气与更高的呼气潮气量(TVe)相关(575.1±148.6 ml对654.2±204.0 ml;P = 0.049)。
面罩正压通气导致区域肺通气改变。与中立头面罩通气相比,旋转头面罩通气并未改善向左侧肺的区域通气。然而,旋转头面罩通气与更高的TVe相关,并且具有更好氧合的潜力。
本研究于2024年8月6日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2400087858)。