Zhao Peng, Yao Yao, Yang Quan, Wang Ning, Wang Liang, Ma Qianquan, Zhang Wenchao
Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Peking University International Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 102206, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86896-x.
This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy and feasibility of the Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, CA, USA) for transbrachial access. A total of 100 patients from July 2020 to December 2023 were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 40 patients underwent ProGlide-guided suture closure following brachial artery (BA) puncture, while 60 patients received traditional manual compression. After successful ultrasound-guided puncture of the BA, a sheath of appropriate diameter (5-7F) was inserted. The Perclose ProGlide system was utilized in patients requiring ipsilateral upper limb intravenous infusion or dynamic blood pressure monitoring. All other patients underwent standard manual compression. No significant differences in major complications, including hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, or active bleeding, were observed between the two groups (P = 0.407). Additionally, there were no reported cases of arterial occlusion, ischemia, or venous thrombosis in either cohort. In the manual compression group, three patients required reintervention due to bleeding or hematoma, whereas no such incidents occurred in the ProGlide group (P = 0.151). Two patients in the manual compression group reported long-term numbness around the puncture site, while no similar neurological dysfunction was observed in the ProGlide group (P = 0.243). Although selection bias was present in this retrospective study, the Perclose ProGlide system presents a beneficial closure method for patients undergoing transbrachial access.
本研究旨在评估Perclose ProGlide缝线介导闭合系统(美国加利福尼亚州红木城雅培血管公司)用于经肱动脉穿刺的临床疗效和可行性。本回顾性研究纳入了2020年7月至2023年12月期间的100例患者。其中,40例患者在肱动脉(BA)穿刺后接受了ProGlide引导下的缝线闭合,而60例患者接受了传统的手动压迫。在成功进行超声引导下的BA穿刺后,插入合适直径(5-7F)的鞘管。Perclose ProGlide系统用于需要同侧上肢静脉输液或动态血压监测的患者。所有其他患者均接受标准的手动压迫。两组之间在包括血肿、假性动脉瘤或活动性出血在内的主要并发症方面未观察到显著差异(P = 0.407)。此外,两组中均未报告动脉闭塞、缺血或静脉血栓形成的病例。在手动压迫组中,3例患者因出血或血肿需要再次干预,而ProGlide组未发生此类事件(P = 0.151)。手动压迫组中有2例患者报告穿刺部位周围长期麻木,而ProGlide组未观察到类似的神经功能障碍(P = 0.243)。尽管本回顾性研究存在选择偏倚,但Perclose ProGlide系统为接受经肱动脉穿刺的患者提供了一种有益的闭合方法。