Jingjie Huang, Bangqi Wu, Peng Qin, Ziyi Zhang, Yupei Cheng, Chaoran Wang, Yuyan Chen, Jing Bai
Postgraduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300381, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87159-5.
Fever has long been recognized as one of the earliest clinical indicators of illness and remains a leading reason for seeking medical care worldwide. It is typically classified based on its duration and underlying etiology. In clinical settings, intractable fever is as common as acute fever, particularly in patients with brain injuries. Beyond infectious causes, stroke survivors often experience recurrent intractable fever due to central or neurogenic mechanisms. This study aims to retrospectively investigate the incidence and clinical characteristics of acute and intractable fever in patients undergoing stroke rehabilitation. It explores the associations between these characteristics and the different types of fever. Additionally, the study seeks to identify potential risk factors contributing to the development of intractable fever, aiming to guide clinical management and optimize treatment strategies for stroke-related fever. This study evaluated 1,065 stroke patients in the rehabilitation phase who were admitted to the Neurorehabilitation Center between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Of these, 230 febrile patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, comprising 194 cases of acute fever and 36 cases of intractable fever. Medical records and clinical characteristics were collected, and the data from the two groups of febrile patients were analyzed using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with intractable fever, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the predictive performance of individual and combined risk factors. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 15.7% of patients experienced intractable fever, which was significantly associated with brainstem lesions (P < 0.05). Compared to patients with acute fever, those with intractable fever had higher NIHSS scores (33.3% vs. 15.5%, P < 0.05), a greater incidence of consciousness disorders (66.7% vs. 28.9%, P < 0.05), and a higher rate of tracheostomy (55.6% vs. 15.5%, P < 0.05). All patients received antibiotic treatment, and gabapentin was administered to 16 cases. Patients with brainstem lesions were less likely to be treated with gabapentin (37.5% vs. 90%, P < 0.05), while those with intracerebral hemorrhage were more likely to receive gabapentin (87.5% vs. 10%, P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that consciousness disorders and tracheostomy status were significant risk factors for intractable fever (P = 0.047, OR 6.691, 95% CI 1.030-43.478; P = 0.021, OR 5.366, 95% CI 1.282-22.465). Brainstem lesions also significantly increased the risk (P = 0.002, OR 9.617, 95% CI 2.277-40.614). Although limited in scope, this retrospective study highlights the increased risk of intractable fever during stroke rehabilitation among patients with consciousness disorders, tracheostomy, and brainstem injuries. The key risk factors identified include higher NIHSS scores, impaired consciousness, tracheostomy status, and brainstem lesions.
长期以来,发热一直被认为是疾病最早出现的临床指标之一,并且仍然是全球范围内就医的主要原因。发热通常根据其持续时间和潜在病因进行分类。在临床环境中,顽固性发热与急性发热一样常见,尤其是在脑损伤患者中。除了感染性原因外,中风幸存者常因中枢或神经源性机制而反复出现顽固性发热。本研究旨在回顾性调查中风康复患者中急性发热和顽固性发热的发生率及临床特征。探讨这些特征与不同类型发热之间的关联。此外,该研究旨在确定导致顽固性发热的潜在危险因素,旨在指导临床管理并优化中风相关发热的治疗策略。本研究评估了2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间入住神经康复中心的1065例处于康复阶段的中风患者。其中,230例发热患者符合纳入标准并被纳入分析,包括194例急性发热患者和366例顽固性发热患者。收集了病历和临床特征,并使用t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和卡方检验对两组发热患者的数据进行了分析。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与顽固性发热相关的危险因素,同时使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估个体和综合危险因素的预测性能。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。15.7%的患者出现顽固性发热,这与脑干病变显著相关(P<0.05)。与急性发热患者相比,顽固性发热患者的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分更高(33.3%对15.5%,P<0.05),意识障碍发生率更高(66.7%对28.9%,P<0.05),气管切开率更高(55.6%对15.5%,P<0.05)。所有患者均接受了抗生素治疗,16例患者使用了加巴喷丁。脑干病变患者使用加巴喷丁治疗的可能性较小(37.5%对90%,P<0.05),而脑出血患者使用加巴喷丁的可能性较大(87.5%对10%,P<0.05)。逻辑回归分析显示,意识障碍和气管切开状态是顽固性发热的重要危险因素(P=0.047,OR 6.691,95%CI 1.030-43.478;P=0.021,OR 5.366,95%CI 1.282-22.465)。脑干病变也显著增加了风险(P=0.002,OR 9.617,95%CI 2.277-40.614)。尽管本回顾性研究范围有限,但它强调了意识障碍、气管切开和脑干损伤患者在中风康复期间出现顽固性发热的风险增加。确定的关键危险因素包括更高的NIHSS评分、意识障碍、气管切开状态和脑干病变。