• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任博弈中社会地位和承诺水平的影响:一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究。

The influence of social status and promise levels in trust games: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.

作者信息

Li Mei, Tang DengFang, Pan Wenbin, Zhang Yujie, Lu Jiachen, Li Hong

机构信息

Department of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01259-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-024-01259-9
PMID:39843826
Abstract

Promises are widely used to increase trust in social status; yet how promise levels and social status influence trust behavior and its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. We used a modified trust game to investigate the effects of promise levels and social status on trust behavior. Participants, as investors paired with trustees of varying social status who were given the opportunity to promise to return different levels of money, were required to decide to whether trust the trustees. In Experiment 1, trustees promised to return high-, medium-, or low-level money to participants, and no return feedback was provided. In Experiment 2, trustees promised to return high- and low-level money to participants. Return feedback was provided and event-related potential (ERP) data were recorded. The behavioral results indicated that participants trusted high-status partners more than low-status partners, regardless of the promise level. The ERP results showed that with low-status partners, the N2 was more negative and the P3 was smaller under low-level promise conditions than under high-level promise conditions. However, with high-status partner, there were no differences in N2 and P3 between high- and low-level promise conditions. Our findings suggest that social status may affect the perception of potential risks across different promise levels in trust.

摘要

承诺被广泛用于增强对社会地位的信任;然而,承诺水平和社会地位如何影响信任行为及其潜在的神经生理机制仍不清楚。我们使用了一种改良的信任博弈来研究承诺水平和社会地位对信任行为的影响。参与者作为投资者与不同社会地位的受托人配对,这些受托人有机会承诺返还不同数额的金钱,参与者需要决定是否信任这些受托人。在实验1中,受托人承诺向参与者返还高、中、低水平的金钱,且不提供返还反馈。在实验2中,受托人承诺向参与者返还高、低水平的金钱。提供返还反馈并记录事件相关电位(ERP)数据。行为结果表明,无论承诺水平如何,参与者对高地位伙伴的信任都高于低地位伙伴。ERP结果显示,对于低地位伙伴,低水平承诺条件下的N2波更负,P3波更小,而高水平承诺条件下则相反。然而,对于高地位伙伴,高水平和低水平承诺条件下的N2波和P3波没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,社会地位可能会影响在信任中对不同承诺水平潜在风险的感知。

相似文献

1
The influence of social status and promise levels in trust games: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.信任博弈中社会地位和承诺水平的影响:一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01259-9.
2
Higher Status Honesty Is Worth More: The Effect of Social Status on Honesty Evaluation.较高地位的诚实更有价值:社会地位对诚实评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00350. eCollection 2018.
3
You have my word: reciprocity expectation modulates feedback-related negativity in the trust game.我向你保证:互惠期望会调节信任博弈中与反馈相关的负性情绪。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0119129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119129. eCollection 2015.
4
Integration of social status and trust through interpersonal brain synchronization.通过人际大脑同步实现社会地位与信任的整合。
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118777. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118777. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Trust and trustworthiness in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人中的信任与可信赖性。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):977-86. doi: 10.1037/a0039736. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
6
Learning to trust a face: The time course of brain activation during a money game.学习信任面孔:金钱游戏中大脑激活的时程。
Neurosci Lett. 2019 Nov 1;712:134501. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134501. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
7
The Impact of Long-Term Tai Chi Practice on the Trust Behavior of Middle-Aged People.长期练习太极拳对中年人群信任行为的影响。
Brain Behav. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70254. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70254.
8
Exploration of the influence of the quantification method and reference scheme on feedback-related negativity and standardized measurement error of feedback-related negativity amplitudes in a trust game.探讨在信任游戏中,量化方法和参照方案对反馈相关负波和反馈相关负波振幅标准化测量误差的影响。
Cortex. 2024 Jun;175:106-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
How dispositional social risk-seeking promotes trusting strangers: Evidence based on brain potentials and neural oscillations.性格上的社会冒险倾向如何促进对陌生人的信任:基于脑电活动和神经振荡的证据
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Aug;146(8):1150-1163. doi: 10.1037/xge0000328. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm.集体信任游戏:基于 HoneyComb 范式的信任游戏的在线团体改编版。
J Vis Exp. 2022 Oct 20(188). doi: 10.3791/63600.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of social hierarchies on neural response to feedback evaluations after advice giving.社会等级制度对提供建议后反馈评价的神经反应的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):e26611. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26611.
2
Social distance modulates the influence of social observation on pro-environmental behavior: An event-related potential (ERP) study.社会距离调节社会观察对亲环境行为的影响:一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究。
Biol Psychol. 2023 Mar;178:108519. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108519. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
Single-trial-based temporal principal component analysis on extracting event-related potentials of interest for an individual subject.
基于单次试验的时间主成分分析,用于提取个体受试者感兴趣的事件相关电位。
J Neurosci Methods. 2023 Feb 1;385:109768. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109768. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
Integration of social status and trust through interpersonal brain synchronization.通过人际大脑同步实现社会地位与信任的整合。
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118777. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118777. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
The Relationship Between Social Class and Generalized Trust: The Mediating Role of Sense of Control.社会阶层与广义信任之间的关系:控制感的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 27;12:729083. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.729083. eCollection 2021.
6
Objective Extraction of Evoked Event-Related Oscillation from Time-Frequency Representation of Event-Related Potentials.目的 从事件相关电位的时频表示中提取诱发电位事件相关振荡。
Neural Plast. 2020 Dec 19;2020:8841354. doi: 10.1155/2020/8841354. eCollection 2020.
7
We, Them, and It: Dictator Game Offers Depend on Hierarchical Social Status, Artificial Intelligence, and Social Dominance.我们、他们与它:独裁者博弈中的提议取决于等级社会地位、人工智能和社会支配地位。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 23;11:541756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.541756. eCollection 2020.
8
Social distance modulates prosocial behaviors in the gain and loss contexts: An event-related potential (ERP) study.社会距离调节得失情境下的亲社会行为:一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Apr;150:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Moral identity relates to the neural processing of third-party moral behavior.道德认同与第三方道德行为的神经处理有关。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 May 17;14(4):435-445. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz016.
10
Higher Status Honesty Is Worth More: The Effect of Social Status on Honesty Evaluation.较高地位的诚实更有价值:社会地位对诚实评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00350. eCollection 2018.