• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

集体信任游戏:基于 HoneyComb 范式的信任游戏的在线团体改编版。

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm.

机构信息

University of Goettingen;

University of Goettingen.

出版信息

J Vis Exp. 2022 Oct 20(188). doi: 10.3791/63600.

DOI:10.3791/63600
PMID:36342133
Abstract

The need to understand trust in groups holistically has led to a surge in new approaches to measuring collective trust. However, this construct is often not fully captured in its emergent qualities by the available research methods. In this paper, the Collective Trust Game (CTG) is presented, a computer-based, multi-agent trust game based on the HoneyComb paradigm, which enables researchers to assess the emergence of collective trust. The CTG builds on previous research on interpersonal trust and adapts the widely known Trust Game to a group setting in the HoneyComb paradigm. Participants take on the role of either an investor or trustee; both roles can be played by groups. Initially, investors and trustees are endowed with a sum of money. Then, the investors need to decide how much, if any, of their endowment they want to send to the trustees. They communicate their tendencies as well as their final decision by moving back and forth on a playfield displaying possible investment amounts. At the end of their decision time, the amount the investors have agreed upon is multiplied and sent to the trustees. The trustees have to communicate how much of that investment, if any, they want to return to the investors. Again, they do so by moving on the playfield. This procedure is repeated for multiple rounds so that collective trust can emerge as a shared construct through repeated interactions. With this procedure, the CTG provides the opportunity to follow the emergence of collective trust in real time through the recording of movement data. The CTG is highly customizable to specific research questions and can be run as an online experiment with little, low cost equipment. This paper shows that the CTG combines the richness of group interaction data with the high internal validity and time-effectiveness of economic games.

摘要

整体理解群体信任的需求导致了新的集体信任测量方法的激增。然而,现有的研究方法往往无法充分捕捉到这一结构的涌现特性。本文提出了一种基于 HoneyComb 范式的计算机多主体信任游戏,即集体信任游戏(CTG),该游戏使研究人员能够评估集体信任的涌现。CTG 建立在人际信任的先前研究基础上,并将广泛使用的信任游戏改编为 HoneyComb 范式中的群体设置。参与者扮演投资者或受托人;这两个角色都可以由群体担任。最初,投资者和受托人被赋予一笔钱。然后,投资者需要决定他们想要将其捐赠额的多少(如果有的话)发送给受托人。他们通过在显示可能投资金额的游戏场地上来回移动来表达自己的倾向和最终决定。在他们的决策时间结束时,投资者同意的金额会被乘以并发送给受托人。受托人需要通过在游戏场地上移动来表达他们想要返还多少投资,如有返还的话。这个过程会重复多轮,以便通过反复互动形成共享的集体信任。通过这个过程,CTG 通过记录运动数据,提供了实时跟踪集体信任的出现的机会。CTG 可以根据具体的研究问题进行高度定制,并且可以作为在线实验运行,所需设备简单且成本低廉。本文表明,CTG 结合了群体互动数据的丰富性与经济游戏的高内部有效性和时效性。

相似文献

1
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm.集体信任游戏:基于 HoneyComb 范式的信任游戏的在线团体改编版。
J Vis Exp. 2022 Oct 20(188). doi: 10.3791/63600.
2
Trust and trustworthiness in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人中的信任与可信赖性。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):977-86. doi: 10.1037/a0039736. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
Investment and repayment in a trust game after ventromedial prefrontal damage.腹内侧前额叶损伤后信托游戏中的投资与回报。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 25;7:593. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00593. eCollection 2013.
4
Integration of social status and trust through interpersonal brain synchronization.通过人际大脑同步实现社会地位与信任的整合。
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118777. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118777. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Evolution of trust in N-player trust games with loss assessment.具有损失评估的N人信任博弈中信任的演变
Chaos. 2024 Sep 1;34(9). doi: 10.1063/5.0228886.
6
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior.人类集体行为研究的蜂巢范式
J Vis Exp. 2019 Jan 19(143). doi: 10.3791/58719.
7
Electrodes as social glue: measuring heart rate promotes giving in the trust game.电极充当社会黏合剂:测量心率可促进信任游戏中的施舍行为。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Jun;80(3):246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
8
Trust game reveals restricted interpersonal transactions in patients with borderline personality disorder.信任博弈揭示了边缘型人格障碍患者人际互动受限的情况。
J Pers Disord. 2009 Aug;23(4):399-409. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.4.399.
9
Framing a trust game as a power game greatly affects interbrain synchronicity between trustor and trustee.将信任游戏构建为权力游戏会极大地影响信任方和受托方之间的大脑同步性。
Soc Neurosci. 2019 Dec;14(6):635-648. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2019.1566171. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
Higher Status Honesty Is Worth More: The Effect of Social Status on Honesty Evaluation.较高地位的诚实更有价值:社会地位对诚实评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00350. eCollection 2018.