Suppr超能文献

医生、护士和社会福利专业人员参与信息系统开发的经历比较:横断面调查研究

Comparisons of Physicians', Nurses', and Social Welfare Professionals' Experiences With Participation in Information System Development: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

作者信息

Martikainen Susanna, Viitanen Johanna, Salovaara Samuel, Kinnunen Ulla-Mari, Lääveri Tinja

机构信息

Department of Health and Social Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Department of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 22;12:e51495. doi: 10.2196/51495.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integration of health care and social welfare services together with the consolidation of health care information systems (HISs) and client information systems (CISs) has become a timely topic. Despite this development, there is a scarcity of systematic research on physicians', registered nurses' (RNs) and social welfare professionals' (SWPs) experiences of participating in the development of HISs and CISs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine how physicians, RNs and SWPs experience collaboration with HIS or CIS vendors, and what kinds of end users have participated in HIS or CIS development.

METHODS

National cross-sectional usability surveys were conducted in Finland among RNs and SWPs in 2020 and physicians in 2021. Questions concerning participation experiences were analyzed by professional group, working sector, managerial position, and age.

RESULTS

In total, 4683 physicians, 3610 RNs, and 990 SWPs responded to the surveys. In all 3 professional groups, those working in nonmanagerial positions and the youngest respondents participated least in HIS or CIS development, and 76% (n=3528) of physicians, 78% (n=2814) of RNs and 67% (n=664) of SWPs had not participated at all. When comparing the groups, physicians were least aware of feedback processes and least satisfied with vendors' interest in end-user feedback and the manner and speed of HIS development. Those who had dedicated working time for HIS or CIS development were less critical of vendors' interest and responsiveness to development ideas than those who had not participated at all. In all 3 professional groups, the youngest were most dissatisfied with HIS and CIS vendor collaboration.

CONCLUSIONS

Experiences of participation in HIS and CIS development were relatively negative across all 3 professional groups, with physicians being the most critical. Dialogue and collaboration between developers and end users-also the youngest ones and frontline workers-need improvement; simply increasing allotted working time is unlikely to produce more positive participation experiences.

摘要

背景

医疗保健与社会福利服务的整合,以及医疗保健信息系统(HIS)和客户信息系统(CIS)的整合,已成为一个热门话题。尽管有这一发展趋势,但关于医生、注册护士(RN)和社会福利专业人员(SWP)参与HIS和CIS开发的经验,缺乏系统性研究。

目的

本研究旨在探讨医生、RN和SWP如何体验与HIS或CIS供应商的合作,以及哪些类型的终端用户参与了HIS或CIS的开发。

方法

2020年在芬兰对RN和SWP进行了全国性横断面可用性调查,2021年对医生进行了调查。关于参与经验的问题按专业组、工作部门、管理职位和年龄进行了分析。

结果

共有4683名医生、3610名RN和990名SWP对调查做出了回应。在所有三个专业组中,非管理职位的人员和最年轻的受访者参与HIS或CIS开发的程度最低,76%(n=3528)的医生、78%(n=2814)的RN和67%(n=664)的SWP根本没有参与。在比较这些组时,医生对反馈过程的了解最少,对供应商对终端用户反馈的兴趣以及HIS开发的方式和速度最不满意。那些为HIS或CIS开发专门安排工作时间的人,对供应商对开发想法的兴趣和响应能力的批评,比那些根本没有参与的人要少。在所有三个专业组中,最年轻的人对HIS和CIS供应商合作最不满意。

结论

所有三个专业组参与HIS和CIS开发的经验都相对负面,医生最为挑剔。开发者与终端用户(包括最年轻的人和一线工作者)之间的对话与合作需要改进;仅仅增加分配的工作时间不太可能产生更积极的参与体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/163f/11780565/184197288326/humanfactors-v12-e51495-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验