Chen Wan-Lin, Ou Ju-Chi, Ko Shih-Yu, Li Wen-Ching, Ma Hon-Ping
Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang-Ho Hospital-Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Emerg Med Int. 2025 Jan 10;2025:9170229. doi: 10.1155/emmi/9170229. eCollection 2025.
Trauma triage is the use of trauma assessment for prioritizing patients for treatment or transport by injury severity. According to Taiwan Public Health Report, accidents and their adverse events were the sixth leading cause of death and accounted for over 7000 casualties in 2009. However, a lack of accuracy in identifying the severity of a patient's injury and their prehospital information can result in inappropriate triage. This study evaluated the efficacy of field triage guidelines governing trauma team activation in Taipei and explored the characteristics of undertriaged and overtriaged patients. This study retrospectively observed all patients with trauma transported to the emergency department of a medical center by Taipei City public ambulance from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. A total of 2217 patients were included. The Cribari matrix method was used to assess undertriage and overtriage. A logistic regression was employed to analyze the effect of risk factors in patients with major trauma. In this study, 320 and 1897 patients with trauma had full and limited trauma team activation, respectively. Among them, 664 patients with trauma were older than 65 years, and most of them were injured in a traffic accident. Among patients with major trauma, 24, 214, and 156 patients were aged < 20, 20-65, and > 65 years, respectively. A logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than 13, with systolic blood pressure level of less than 90, and with respiratory rate over 30 breaths per minute was more likely to be appropriately triaged. The Taipei prehospital field triage guidelines are acceptable but not an ideal tool for identifying patients with major trauma, with an overtriage rate of 48.12% and an undertriage rate of 12.03%. To decrease undertriage or overtriage rates, emergency medical service providers should receive comprehensive training.
创伤分诊是利用创伤评估,根据损伤严重程度对患者进行治疗或转运的优先排序。根据台湾公共卫生报告,事故及其不良事件是第六大主要死因,2009年造成7000多人伤亡。然而,在识别患者损伤严重程度及其院前信息方面缺乏准确性可能导致不适当的分诊。本研究评估了台北市创伤团队启动现场分诊指南的有效性,并探讨了分诊不足和分诊过度患者的特征。本研究回顾性观察了2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间由台北市公共救护车转运至某医疗中心急诊科的所有创伤患者。共纳入2217例患者。采用克里巴里矩阵法评估分诊不足和分诊过度情况。采用逻辑回归分析重大创伤患者危险因素的影响。在本研究中,分别有320例和1897例创伤患者启动了全面和有限的创伤团队。其中,664例创伤患者年龄超过65岁,大多数因交通事故受伤。在重大创伤患者中,年龄<20岁、20 - 65岁和>65岁的患者分别为24例、214例和156例。逻辑回归分析显示,格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分低于13分、收缩压水平低于90、呼吸频率超过每分钟30次的患者更有可能得到适当分诊。台北市院前现场分诊指南是可以接受的,但不是识别重大创伤患者的理想工具,分诊过度率为48.12%,分诊不足率为12.03%。为降低分诊不足或分诊过度率,紧急医疗服务提供者应接受全面培训。