Bidarmaghz Bardia, Sabat Nestor, Hodgkinson Peter, O'Rourke Thomas, Butler Nick, Yeung Shinn, Slater Kellee
Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, AUS.
General Surgery, Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, AUS.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 22;16(12):e76216. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76216. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Background Bile duct injury (BDI) is a serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Large studies report an incidence of 0.08%-0.3%, but they also suggest that BDI in the LC era is more severe than in the era of open cholecystectomy. In light of our reported experience of managing BDI in 2002, this study aims to evaluate changes over the past two decades. Methods A single-center retrospective review for all patients referred to the hepatobiliary surgeons at the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Queensland, Australia for the management of BDI that occurred during LC from January 2001 to May 2022. This was compared to our historical data from 1990 to 2000 and statistically analyzed. Demographic characteristics, type of injury, intra-operative cholangiogram completion, attempted repair, the timing of referral to the tertiary center, and definite repair of BDI were analyzed. Results Sixty-five patients were referred to us with a similar severity of BDI to our previous study, but analysis showed an increase in intraoperative recognition of the injury to 74.4% (32 out of 43 patients). Additionally, the number of intra-operative cholangiograms performed increased dramatically to 66.2% (43 patients) which resulted in an increase in recognition of BDI. Conversion rate to open technique and attempted primary repair by operating surgeon decreased to 63% (27 patients) and 16% (11 patients), respectively, with referral time significantly shortened (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion The past two decades show an increased recognition of BDI, use of intra-operative cholangiogram, and decreased attempts to repair by the operating surgeon which can result in significant long-term complications. Instead, early recognition of BDI is critical for improved patient outcomes alongside expedited referral and appropriate surgical management by a hepatobiliary surgeon at a tertiary center.
背景 胆管损伤(BDI)是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的一种严重并发症。大型研究报告其发生率为0.08%-0.3%,但这些研究也表明,LC时代的BDI比开放胆囊切除术时代更为严重。鉴于我们在2002年报告的处理BDI的经验,本研究旨在评估过去二十年中的变化。方法 对2001年1月至2022年5月期间在澳大利亚昆士兰州亚历山德拉公主医院因LC术中发生BDI而转诊至肝胆外科医生处的所有患者进行单中心回顾性研究。将其与我们1990年至2000年的历史数据进行比较并进行统计分析。分析了人口统计学特征、损伤类型、术中胆管造影完成情况、尝试修复情况、转诊至三级中心的时间以及BDI的确定性修复情况。结果 有65名患者转诊至我们这里,其BDI严重程度与我们之前的研究相似,但分析显示术中对损伤的识别率提高到了74.4%(43名患者中的32名)。此外,术中进行胆管造影的数量大幅增加至66.2%(43名患者),这导致BDI的识别率提高。转为开放手术的比例以及手术医生尝试一期修复的比例分别降至63%(27名患者)和16%(11名患者),转诊时间显著缩短(P值<0.001)。结论 在过去二十年中,对BDI的识别有所增加,术中胆管造影的使用增加,手术医生尝试修复的次数减少,而这可能导致严重的长期并发症。相反,早期识别BDI对于改善患者预后至关重要,同时还需要加快转诊并由三级中心的肝胆外科医生进行适当的手术管理。