• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

句子生成过程中焦点和重音处理的线性增量:来自眼动的证据。

Linear incrementality in focus and accentuation processing during sentence production: evidence from eye movements.

作者信息

Zhang Zhenghua, Zhang Qingfang

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 7;18:1523629. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1523629. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1523629
PMID:39845409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11753244/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While considerable research in language production has focused on incremental processing during conceptual and grammatical encoding, prosodic encoding remains less investigated. This study examines whether focus and accentuation processing in speech production follows linear or hierarchical incrementality.

METHODS

We employed visual world eye-tracking to investigate how focus and accentuation are processed during sentence production. Participants were asked to complete a scenario description task where they were prompted to use a predetermined sentence structure to accurately convey the scenario, thereby spontaneously accentuate the corresponding entity. We manipulated the positions of focus with accentuation (initial vs. medial) by changing the scenarios. The initial and medial positions correspond to the first and second nouns in sentences like "N1 is above N2, not N3."

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that speech latencies were significantly shorter in the sentences with initial focus accentuation than those with medial focus accentuation. Furthermore, eye-tracking data demonstrated that speakers quickly displayed a preference for fixating on initial information after scenarios onset. Crucially, the time-course analysis revealed that the onset of the initial focus accentuation effect (around 460 ms) preceded that of the medial focus accentuation effect (around 920 ms).

DISCUSSION

These results support that focus and accentuation processing during speech production prior to articulation follows linear incrementality rather than hierarchical incrementality.

摘要

引言

虽然语言产出方面的大量研究集中在概念和语法编码过程中的增量处理,但韵律编码的研究较少。本研究考察了言语产出中的焦点和重音处理是遵循线性增量还是层次增量。

方法

我们采用视觉世界眼动追踪技术来研究句子产出过程中焦点和重音是如何处理的。参与者被要求完成一个情景描述任务,在这个任务中,他们被提示使用预定的句子结构来准确传达情景,从而自发地突出相应的实体。我们通过改变情景来操纵焦点与重音的位置(初始位置与中间位置)。初始位置和中间位置分别对应于句子“N1在N2上方,而不是N3”中的第一个和第二个名词。

结果

我们的研究结果显示,初始焦点重音的句子的言语延迟显著短于中间焦点重音的句子。此外,眼动追踪数据表明,在情景呈现后,说话者很快就表现出对注视初始信息的偏好。至关重要的是,时程分析表明,初始焦点重音效应的起始时间(约460毫秒)早于中间焦点重音效应的起始时间(约920毫秒)。

讨论

这些结果支持了在发音前的言语产出过程中,焦点和重音处理遵循线性增量而非层次增量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/c85991403c48/fnhum-18-1523629-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/146240ecd4ef/fnhum-18-1523629-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/b799eed3e893/fnhum-18-1523629-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/6680e044a853/fnhum-18-1523629-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/157c99883735/fnhum-18-1523629-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/c85991403c48/fnhum-18-1523629-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/146240ecd4ef/fnhum-18-1523629-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/b799eed3e893/fnhum-18-1523629-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/6680e044a853/fnhum-18-1523629-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/157c99883735/fnhum-18-1523629-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6213/11753244/c85991403c48/fnhum-18-1523629-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Linear incrementality in focus and accentuation processing during sentence production: evidence from eye movements.句子生成过程中焦点和重音处理的线性增量:来自眼动的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 7;18:1523629. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1523629. eCollection 2024.
2
Accentuation Affects the Planning Scope and Focus-Accentuation Consistency Modulates Sentence Production: Evidence From Eye Movements.重音影响规划范围和焦点——重音一致性调节句子生成:来自眼动的证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Mar 5;68(3):853-879. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00445. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
3
Word Order and Voice Influence the Timing of Verb Planning in German Sentence Production.词序和语态影响德语句子生成中动词规划的时机。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01648. eCollection 2017.
4
Planning to speak in L1 and L2.计划用母语和第二语言发言。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 May;102:72-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Fine-grained time course of verb aspect processing.动词体貌精细时间进程。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264132. eCollection 2022.
6
Incrementality in Planning of Speech During Speaking and Reading Aloud: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.朗读与默读时言语规划的增量性:来自眼动追踪的证据
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 26;7:33. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00033. eCollection 2016.
7
Recovery of Sentence Production Processes Following Language Treatment in Aphasia: Evidence from Eyetracking.失语症语言治疗后句子生成过程的恢复:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 13;11:101. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00101. eCollection 2017.
8
Accessibility of Referent Information Influences Sentence Planning: An Eye-Tracking Study.参照信息的可获取性影响句子规划:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 28;8:250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00250. eCollection 2017.
9
Ageing of grammatical advance planning in spoken sentence production: an eye movement study.口语句子生成中语法预先规划的老化:一项眼动研究。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):652-669. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01861-5. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
10
How accentuation influences semantic short-term memory representations during on-line speech processing: an event-related potential study.重音如何影响在线言语处理过程中的语义短时记忆表征:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neuroscience. 2011 Oct 13;193:217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
A Testlet Diagnostic Classification Model with Attribute Hierarchies.具有属性层次结构的测试题诊断分类模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 May;47(3):183-199. doi: 10.1177/01466216231165315. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Referential Chains Reveal Predictive Processes and Form-to-Function Mapping: An Electroencephalographic Study Using Naturalistic Story Stimuli.指称链揭示预测过程与形式到功能的映射:一项使用自然故事刺激的脑电图研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 19;12:623648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623648. eCollection 2021.
3
Pitch accents create dissociable syntactic and semantic expectations during sentence processing.
重音在句子处理过程中产生可分离的句法和语义预期。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104702. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104702. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Rhythmic pattern facilitates speech production: An ERP study.节律模式促进言语产生:一项 ERP 研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 10;9(1):12974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49375-8.
5
Occurrence of the potent mutagens 2- nitrobenzanthrone and 3-nitrobenzanthrone in fine airborne particles.强诱变剂 2-硝基苯并蒽酮和 3-硝基苯并蒽酮在细颗粒空气中的存在。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 9;9(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2.
6
Planning to speak in L1 and L2.计划用母语和第二语言发言。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 May;102:72-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.12.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
Assessing priming for prosodic representations: Speaking rate, intonational phrase boundaries, and pitch accenting.评估韵律表征的启动效应:语速、语调短语边界与音高重音
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):625-641. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0789-5.
8
Accessibility of Referent Information Influences Sentence Planning: An Eye-Tracking Study.参照信息的可获取性影响句子规划:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 28;8:250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00250. eCollection 2017.
9
Priming Implicit Prosody: Prosodic Boundaries and Individual Differences.启动内隐韵律:韵律边界与个体差异
Lang Speech. 2015 Dec;58(Pt 4):459-73. doi: 10.1177/0023830914563368.
10
The timing of verb selection in Japanese sentence production.日语句子生成中动词选择的时机。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):813-24. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000195. Epub 2015 Nov 16.