Curcio Elizabeth, Meester Alyssa S, Harding Angela, Lockhart Marie M, Dillis John
OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2025 Jan 18:00185787251313695. doi: 10.1177/00185787251313695.
Optimal dosing of VTE prophylaxis for specific patient populations remains an area of concern as insufficient evidence exists regarding dosing for underweight patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of major bleeding events in underweight patients given different prophylactic doses of enoxaparin. This is a retrospective analysis performed at multiple hospitals within a single health care system. Patients with a BMI < 18.5 kg/m were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received at least 1 prophylactic dose of enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneously once daily or enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily. Underweight adult patients were included if they were admitted to an ICU for at least 48 hours and received at least 1 dose of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis during their ICU admission. The primary aim was to compare the incidence of clinically significant bleeding between dosing strategies. Secondary aims included the incidence of VTE during admission, ICU length of stay, overall hospital length of stay, and all-cause mortality 30 days post-discharge. A total of 310 patients met inclusion criteria for this study, with 80 patients in the 30 mg group and 230 patients in the 40 mg group. There was no significant difference in major bleeding events between the 2 groups ( = .61). No significant differences in incidence of VTE ( = .455 ), ICU length of stay ( = .466), overall hospital stay ( = .502), or all-cause mortality ( = .925) were found between groups. No difference was found in clinically significant bleeding between underweight critically ill patients receiving VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin 30 mg once daily or 40 mg once daily. Further studies are needed to evaluate the optimal dosing of VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin in underweight patients.
由于针对体重过轻患者的剂量缺乏足够证据,特定患者群体的VTE预防最佳剂量仍是一个令人关注的领域。本研究的目的是比较给予不同预防剂量依诺肝素的体重过轻患者的大出血事件发生率。这是在单一医疗系统内的多家医院进行的一项回顾性分析。BMI<18.5kg/m的患者根据是否接受至少1次每日1次皮下注射30mg依诺肝素预防剂量或每日1次皮下注射40mg依诺肝素分为2组。体重过轻的成年患者如果入住ICU至少48小时且在ICU住院期间接受至少1剂依诺肝素进行VTE预防,则纳入研究。主要目的是比较不同给药策略之间具有临床意义的出血发生率。次要目的包括住院期间VTE的发生率、ICU住院时间、总住院时间以及出院后30天的全因死亡率。共有310例患者符合本研究的纳入标准,30mg组80例患者,40mg组230例患者。两组之间的大出血事件无显著差异(P = 0.61)。两组之间在VTE发生率(P = 0.455)、ICU住院时间(P = 0.466)、总住院时间(P = 0.502)或全因死亡率(P = 0.925)方面均未发现显著差异。在接受每日1次30mg或40mg依诺肝素进行VTE预防的体重过轻的重症患者之间,具有临床意义的出血情况未发现差异。需要进一步研究来评估体重过轻患者使用依诺肝素进行VTE预防的最佳剂量。