Liu Yixuan, Liu Jiahuan, Liu Min, Wang Minzhuo
Institute of Physical Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.
School of Marxism, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1496482. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1496482. eCollection 2024.
The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRT) to heavy-load resistance training (HL-RT) in male collegiate athletes with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP).
Twenty-six participants were randomly assigned to LL-BFRT ( = 13) or HL-RT ( = 13). All participants supervised exercises (deep-squat, lateral pull-down, bench-press and machine seated crunch) cycled 4 times per week for 4 weeks (16 sessions). LL-BFRT was done at 30% 1-repetition maximum (1RM) with 70% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP). HL-RT was done at 70% 1-RM. The outcomes were isokinetic core strength, isometric core endurance, pain intensity, and lumbar function disability level, measured at baseline and 4 weeks. Intra-group differences were evaluated using -tests.
Pain intensity and function disability level in LL-BFRT had extremely significant improvement at 4 weeks ( < 0.001, ES = 1.44-1.84). Participants in LL-BFRT and HL-RT showed significant differences in core extensors peak torque-body weight ratio (PT/BW) at isokinetic 120°/s and 30°/s, respectively (LL-BFRT: = 0.045, ES = 0.62; HL-RT: = 0.013, ES = 0.81). Isometric core extensor endurance was significantly increased in both groups (LL-BFRT: = 0.016, ES = 0.78; HL-RT: = 0.011, ES = 0.83).
Four weeks of LL-BFRT significantly reduced pain and functional disability while inducing similar strength gains as HL-RT in male collegiate athletes with CNLBP. Thereby, BFRT may qualify as a valuable training strategy for people with physical limitations.
本研究旨在比较低负荷血流限制训练(LL-BFRT)与高负荷抗阻训练(HL-RT)对患有慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)的男性大学生运动员的效果。
26名参与者被随机分配到LL-BFRT组(n = 13)或HL-RT组(n = 13)。所有参与者在监督下进行练习(深蹲、下拉、卧推和坐姿卷腹机练习),每周循环进行4次,共4周(16节训练课)。LL-BFRT在1次重复最大值(1RM)的30%负荷下进行,动脉闭塞压力(AOP)为70%。HL-RT在1RM的70%负荷下进行。在基线和4周时测量等速核心力量、等长核心耐力、疼痛强度和腰椎功能障碍水平等结果。组内差异采用t检验进行评估。
LL-BFRT组在4周时疼痛强度和功能障碍水平有极显著改善(P < 0.001,效应量ES = 1.44 - 1.84)。LL-BFRT组和HL-RT组在等速120°/s和30°/s时的核心伸肌峰值扭矩与体重比(PT/BW)分别显示出显著差异(LL-BFRT组:P = 0.045,ES = 0.62;HL-RT组:P = 0.013,ES = 0.81)。两组的等长核心伸肌耐力均显著增加(LL-BFRT组:P = 0.016,ES = 0.78;HL-RT组:P = 0.011,ES = 0.83)。
四周的LL-BFRT显著减轻了患有CNLBP的男性大学生运动员的疼痛和功能障碍,同时在力量增长方面与HL-RT相似。因此,BFRT可能是适合身体有局限的人的一种有价值的训练策略。