Suppr超能文献

低负荷血流限制力量训练在 COPD 患者中的应用:一项随机单盲先导研究。

Low-load blood flow restriction strength training in patients with COPD: a randomised single-blind pilot study.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Thorax. 2024 Mar 15;79(4):340-348. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220546.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of lower limb low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRT) with high-load strength training (HL-ST) as part of an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme on leg strength in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Participants were randomised to LL-BFRT or HL-ST (24 sessions). LL-BFRT was done at 30% 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) with 70% arterial occlusion pressure. HL-ST was done at 70% 1-RM. Primary outcome was isometric strength of knee extensors and flexors. Secondary outcomes were 1-RM, functional exercise capacity, physical activity, symptom burden and health-related quality of life. Perceptions of dyspnoea and leg fatigue were recorded after every exercise. We compared groups with t-tests.

RESULTS

We included 30 participants (13 women, 17 men, 64 (9) years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 47 (18)% pred.), 24 completed the study. Isometric knee extensor strength improved to a clinically relevant degree in both legs in both groups (LL-BFRT: right leg 9 (20) Nm, left leg 10 (18) Nm; HL-ST: right leg 15 (26) Nm, left leg 16 (30) Nm, data are mean (SD)), without statistically significant or clinically relevant between-group differences (right leg mean difference= -6.4, 95% CI= -13.20 to 25.92 Nm, left leg mean difference= -5.6, 95% CI= -15.44 to 26.55 Nm). 1 min sit-to-stand test performance improved to a clinically relevant degree only in the LL-BFRT group (4 (4) vs 1 (5) repetitions). Interestingly, physical activity improved to a clinically relevant degree only in the LL-BFRT group (1506 (2441) vs -182 (1971) steps/day). LL-BFRT lowered perceived in-exercise dyspnoea and increased leg fatigue compared with HL-ST in the initial 12 trainings.

CONCLUSION

In patients with stable COPD undergoing outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation, LL-BFRT was not superior to HL-ST in improving leg strength. LL-BFRT led to similar strength gains as HL-ST while reducing perceptions of dyspnoea in the initial training phase.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04151771.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较下肢低负荷血流限制训练(LL-BFRT)与高强度力量训练(HL-ST)作为门诊肺康复计划的一部分,对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者腿部力量的有效性。

方法

参与者被随机分配到 LL-BFRT 或 HL-ST(24 次)组。LL-BFRT 在动脉闭塞压的 70%下以 30%的 1 次重复最大值(1-RM)进行。HL-ST 在 70%的 1-RM 下进行。主要结果是膝关节伸肌和屈肌的等长强度。次要结果是 1-RM、功能运动能力、身体活动、症状负担和健康相关生活质量。每次运动后记录呼吸困难和腿部疲劳的感觉。我们用 t 检验比较组间差异。

结果

我们纳入了 30 名参与者(13 名女性,17 名男性,64(9)岁,1 秒用力呼气量占预计值的 47(18)%),其中 24 名完成了研究。两组的等速膝关节伸肌力量均显著改善(LL-BFRT:右膝 9(20)Nm,左膝 10(18)Nm;HL-ST:右膝 15(26)Nm,左膝 16(30)Nm,数据为均值(SD)),且组间无统计学显著或临床相关差异(右膝平均差值=-6.4,95%CI=-13.20 至 25.92 Nm,左膝平均差值=-5.6,95%CI=-15.44 至 26.55 Nm)。只有 LL-BFRT 组的 1 分钟坐站测试性能显著改善(4(4)次与 1(5)次)。有趣的是,只有 LL-BFRT 组的身体活动显著改善(1506(2441)步/天与-182(1971)步/天)。与 HL-ST 相比,LL-BFRT 在最初的 12 次训练中降低了运动中的呼吸困难感,并增加了腿部疲劳感。

结论

在接受门诊肺康复治疗的稳定期 COPD 患者中,LL-BFRT 并不优于 HL-ST 改善腿部力量。LL-BFRT 在减少初始训练阶段呼吸困难感的同时,可获得与 HL-ST 相似的力量增益。

试验注册号

NCT04151771。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d44/10958309/5ba96a32554e/thorax-2023-220546f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验