Zeidan Zaki, Tran Joshua, Hwang Yeagyeong, Huynh Linda My, Nguyen Mai Xuan, Huang Erica, Zhang Whitney, Ahlering Thomas
Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Dec 31;71:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.12.004. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Positive surgical margins (PSMs) following radical prostatectomy (RP) have been seen as inherently unfavorable. However, a large international multi-institutional study recently revealed that unifocal PSMs (UPSMs) had no impact on prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), whereas multifocal PSMs (MPSMs) did. Our aim was to assess the relative impact of PSMs versus percentage tumor volume (PTV) on PCSM.
We analyzed data for 1552 patients who underwent robot-assisted RP performed by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2018 at a tertiary referral center with up to 15-yr follow-up. Patients were divided into negative surgical margin (NSM), UPSM, and MPSM groups, with PTV stratification using a cutoff of 40%. The primary outcome was stepwise multivariate regression analysis of predictors of PCSM (pT stage, pathological Gleason grade group, PTV, UPSM, and MPSM). The secondary outcome was the risk of 15-yr PCSM via Kaplan-Meier analysis.
The group with 40-100% PTV was older and presented with more advanced grade and stage. High PTV was significantly associated with greater risk of PSM, biochemical recurrence, PCSM, and overall mortality at 15 yr ( < 0.001). In addition to high stage and grade, MPSM predicted PCSM in multivariate analysis, but lost predictive significance when PTV was included. Limitations of the study include the retrospective nature and the single-center setting.
Our study further challenges the belief that MPSMs inherently have an adverse impact on PCSM. Instead, MPSMs appear to signify more aggressive underlying disease that predominantly drives oncological outcomes. We recommend considering PTV as a more reliable predictor of PCSM. While avoidance of PSMs remains a critical surgical principle, this goal in prostate cancer needs to be weighed against urinary and sexual function outcomes.
After surgery to remove the prostate in men with prostate cancer, samples from the edge of the prostate that are positive for tumor cells are called positive surgical margins (PSMs). Results from our study show that a PSM on its own is not necessarily an adverse factor. However, PSMs may be a sign of higher severity of prostate cancer. We found that men with a high tumor volume have a higher risk of dying from their prostate cancer.
根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后切缘阳性(PSM)一直被视为本质上预后不良。然而,最近一项大型国际多机构研究表明,单灶性切缘阳性(UPSM)对前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)无影响,而多灶性切缘阳性(MPSM)则有影响。我们的目的是评估PSM与肿瘤体积百分比(PTV)对PCSM的相对影响。
我们分析了2002年至2018年间在一家三级转诊中心由一名外科医生实施机器人辅助RP的1552例患者的数据,随访时间长达15年。患者分为切缘阴性(NSM)、UPSM和MPSM组,并以40%为界值进行PTV分层。主要结局是对PCSM的预测因素(pT分期、病理Gleason分级组、PTV、UPSM和MPSM)进行逐步多因素回归分析。次要结局是通过Kaplan-Meier分析得出的15年PCSM风险。
PTV为40%-100%的组年龄更大,分级和分期更高。高PTV与15年时PSM、生化复发、PCSM及总死亡率的更高风险显著相关(<0.001)。在多因素分析中,除了高分期和高分级外,MPSM可预测PCSM,但纳入PTV后失去预测意义。本研究的局限性包括回顾性研究性质和单中心研究环境。
我们的研究进一步挑战了MPSM本质上对PCSM有不良影响的观点。相反,MPSM似乎表明潜在疾病更具侵袭性,这主要决定肿瘤学结局。我们建议将PTV视为PCSM更可靠的预测指标。虽然避免切缘阳性仍然是一项关键的手术原则,但在前列腺癌中这一目标需要与泌尿和性功能结局相权衡。
在前列腺癌男性患者进行前列腺切除术后,前列腺边缘肿瘤细胞阳性的样本被称为切缘阳性(PSM)。我们研究的结果表明,单独的PSM不一定是不利因素。然而,PSM可能是前列腺癌严重程度较高的一个标志。我们发现肿瘤体积大的男性死于前列腺癌的风险更高。