• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后下尿路症状变化的基线因素和手术操作:保留神经的影响

Baseline factors and surgical procedures affecting changes in lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the impact of nerve-sparing.

作者信息

Soda Takeshi, Otsuka Hikari, Koike Shuhei, Okada Takuya

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, 2-4-20 Ogimachi, Kita-Ku, Osaka, 530-8480, Japan.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Mar;56(3):989-997. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03859-9. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-023-03859-9
PMID:37907707
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine baseline factors and surgical procedures associated with clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our RARP database and analyzed the changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to determine variables that predicted clinically meaningful improvement (∆IPSS ≤ -5) or deterioration (∆IPSS ≥ 5) in LUTS after RARP.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients were eligible for analysis. Patients aged ≥ 70 reported a higher IPSS before and after RARP (all p < 0.05). Patients with a prostate volume of > 30 mL or body mass index of < 24 kg/m had worse preoperative LUTS; however, the difference disappeared after RARP. While patients with or without nerve-sparing (NS) had a similar preoperative LUTS burden, the NS group reported significantly lower IPSS than the non-NS group at all postoperative time points (p < 0.05). Twelve months after RARP, LUTS improved in 27% and worsened in 6% of patients in the NS group, compared with 20% and 24% of those in the non-NS group, respectively (p = 0.018). Preoperative IPSS (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.89) and NS (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.83) were independently associated with clinically meaningful changes of LUTS at 12 months after RARP.

CONCLUSION

Other than baseline LUTS severity, NS was the only independent factor associated with clinically meaningful changes in LUTS after RARP.

摘要

目的

确定与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后下尿路症状(LUTS)出现具有临床意义的改善或恶化相关的基线因素和手术操作。

方法

我们回顾性分析了我们的RARP数据库,并分析了基线时以及术后1、3、6和12个月时国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)的变化。进行多变量有序逻辑回归分析以确定预测RARP后LUTS出现具有临床意义的改善(∆IPSS≤ -5)或恶化(∆IPSS≥ 5)的变量。

结果

共有172例患者符合分析条件。年龄≥70岁的患者在RARP前后的IPSS较高(所有p < 0.05)。前列腺体积> 30 mL或体重指数< 24 kg/m²的患者术前LUTS更严重;然而,RARP后差异消失。虽然有或没有保留神经(NS)的患者术前LUTS负担相似,但NS组在所有术后时间点的IPSS均显著低于非NS组(p < 0.05)。RARP后12个月,NS组27%的患者LUTS改善,6%的患者LUTS恶化,而非NS组分别为20%和24%(p = 0.018)。术前IPSS(OR,0.84;95% CI,0.79 - 0.89)和NS(OR,0.39;95% CI,0.18 - 0.83)与RARP后12个月LUTS的具有临床意义的变化独立相关。

结论

除了基线LUTS严重程度外,NS是与RARP后LUTS具有临床意义的变化相关的唯一独立因素。

相似文献

1
Baseline factors and surgical procedures affecting changes in lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the impact of nerve-sparing.影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后下尿路症状变化的基线因素和手术操作:保留神经的影响
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Mar;56(3):989-997. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03859-9. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
2
Improved lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: implications for survivorship, treatment selection and patient counselling.机器人辅助前列腺根治术后下尿路症状改善:对生存、治疗选择和患者咨询的影响。
BJU Int. 2019 May;123 Suppl 5:47-53. doi: 10.1111/bju.14717. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
The impact of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on lower urinary tract function: Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and frequency volume charts.神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对下尿路功能的影响:患者报告结局和频率体积图表的前瞻性评估。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):322-330. doi: 10.1002/nau.23297. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
4
Improvement of quality of life and symptom burden after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with moderate to severe LUTS.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后中重度下尿路症状患者生活质量和症状负担的改善。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 18;11(1):16757. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95525-2.
5
The Effect of the Vesical Adaptation Response to Diuresis on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Proof of Concept Study.膀胱对利尿的适应性反应对机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后下尿路症状的影响:一项概念验证性初步研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 22;11(7):e0159514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159514. eCollection 2016.
6
Impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on lower urinary tract symptoms and predictive factors for symptom changes: a longitudinal study.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对下尿路症状的影响及症状变化的预测因素:一项纵向研究。
Urology. 2013 Apr;81(4):787-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.038. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
7
Retrospective evaluation of the improvement in the urinary status-related quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.回顾性评价机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿状态相关生活质量的改善。
Int J Urol. 2023 Nov;30(11):1020-1027. doi: 10.1111/iju.15251. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
8
Intravesical prostatic protrusion may affect early postoperative continence undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.膀胱内前列腺突出可能会影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期的控尿功能。
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 21;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00740-0.
9
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Surgical Margin Status and Tumor Volume on Mortality After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.手术切缘状态和肿瘤体积对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后死亡率的影响。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Dec 31;71:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.12.004. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Exploring the role of health-related quality of life measures in predictive modelling for oncology: a systematic review.探索健康相关生活质量测量在肿瘤学预测模型中的作用:一项系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):305-323. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03820-y. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation between extended pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary incontinence at early phase after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫与尿失禁的相关性
Int J Urol. 2023 Apr;30(4):340-346. doi: 10.1111/iju.15119. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
2
De Novo Detrusor Underactivity and Other Urodynamic Findings after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.根治性前列腺切除术后新发逼尿肌活动低下和其他尿动力学发现:系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 4;58(3):381. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030381.
3
Longitudinal, 5-year long-term outcomes for urinary continence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients.
日本患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后5年尿失禁及生活质量的纵向长期结果。
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022 May;14(3):178-185. doi: 10.1111/luts.12421. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
4
Improvement of quality of life and symptom burden after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with moderate to severe LUTS.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后中重度下尿路症状患者生活质量和症状负担的改善。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 18;11(1):16757. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95525-2.
5
Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy.术前运动干预以优化根治性前列腺切除术后的控尿效果。
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 May;18(5):259-281. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00445-5. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
6
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Improved lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: implications for survivorship, treatment selection and patient counselling.机器人辅助前列腺根治术后下尿路症状改善:对生存、治疗选择和患者咨询的影响。
BJU Int. 2019 May;123 Suppl 5:47-53. doi: 10.1111/bju.14717. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
Critical appraisal of literature comparing minimally invasive extraperitoneal and transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较微创腹膜外和经腹根治性前列腺切除术的文献的批判性评价:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arab J Urol. 2017 Aug 31;15(4):267-279. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.07.003. eCollection 2017 Dec.
9
Comparison of Functional Outcome after Extended versus Super-Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.高危局限性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术中扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫与超扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术后功能结局的比较
Front Oncol. 2017 Nov 22;7:280. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00280. eCollection 2017.
10
The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.海绵体神经血管束保留在根治性前列腺切除术中的风险和获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2017 Oct;198(4):760-769. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3344. Epub 2017 Mar 9.