Suppr超能文献

试行一个分析公众对研发贡献的框架:聚焦新型抗生素

'Piloting a framework for analysing the public contributions to R&D: new antibiotics in focus'.

作者信息

Schmidt Louise, Sehic Ozren, Theuretzbacher Ursula, Fabian Daniel, Wild Claudia

机构信息

Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment (AIHTA), Vienna, Austria.

Center for Anti-Infective Agents, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jan 21;18(1):2449045. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2449045. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within the context of increasing transparency around public contributions, a framework for reporting and analysing public contributions to research and development (R&D) was previously developed and is piloted here using the example of antibiotics. The aim of this work is to check whether the category system is feasible, to revise and adjust the granularity of the category system where necessary, and to expand the range of sources for detailed analyses.

METHODS

All antimicrobial medicinal products in development, discontinued and approved in the last 10 years were identified in the literature. Thereafter clinical trials and company information was searched generating a list of 56 compounds where primarily small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) were involved in antibiotics development. Information on clinical trials, university spinouts and public funding for SMEs was then gathered from various sources. The framework for classifying public contributions was then applied.

RESULTS

We found that around one-third of antibiotics are developed by SMEs. We identified numerous public funding sources for SMEs that develop antibiotics. At both early-stage and late-stage development, public research funding is the most common public funding reported by SMEs, ahead of other public sources like public equity funds, private-public partnerships and philanthropic sources. A deep-dive into one antibiotic drug, Venatorx, revealed public funds investment of approximately $655 million, dwarfing private investment funds. We found the classification framework generally practicable and we suggest recommendations to improve its granularity and applicability.

CONCLUSION

In this paper we piloted and revised a framework that has been developed to classify types of public contributions to pharmaceutical products at different stages of development. The framework, together with work we have done on identifying sources for funding, can be applied to support pharmaceutical price negotiations that reflect the level of public contribution to product development. EU Clinical Trials Register identifier: 0004-2083-2207. EU Clinical Trials Register identifier: 0003-1754-9422.

摘要

背景

在公共资金投入透明度日益提高的背景下,此前已制定了一个报告和分析公共资金对研发(R&D)投入的框架,本文以抗生素为例对其进行试点。这项工作的目的是检验分类系统是否可行,必要时修订和调整分类系统的粒度,并扩大详细分析的来源范围。

方法

在文献中识别过去10年中处于研发、已终止研发和已获批的所有抗菌药物。此后,搜索了临床试验和公司信息,生成了一份56种化合物的清单,其中主要是中小企业(SME)参与了抗生素研发。然后从各种来源收集了关于临床试验、大学衍生企业和中小企业公共资金的信息。随后应用了公共资金投入分类框架。

结果

我们发现约三分之一的抗生素由中小企业研发。我们识别出众多为研发抗生素的中小企业提供资金的公共来源。在早期和后期研发阶段,公共研究资金是中小企业报告的最常见公共资金来源,领先于其他公共来源,如公共股权基金、公私合作项目和慈善资金来源。对一种抗生素药物Venatorx的深入研究显示,公共资金投资约6.55亿美元,使私人投资资金相形见绌。我们发现该分类框架总体可行,并提出了改进其粒度和适用性的建议。

结论

在本文中,我们对一个已开发的框架进行了试点和修订,该框架用于对药品不同研发阶段的公共资金投入类型进行分类。该框架以及我们在识别资金来源方面所做的工作,可用于支持反映公共资金对产品研发投入水平的药品价格谈判。欧盟临床试验注册标识符:0004 - 2083 - 2207。欧盟临床试验注册标识符:0003 - 1754 - 9422。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d8/11753009/31cc81d985ac/JPPP_A_2449045_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验