Kwong Elizabeth, Adapa Karthik, Goodacre Viola, Vizer Lisa, Ra Jin, Greenberg Caprice, Ivester Thomas, Charguia Nadia, Marks Lawrence B, Mazur Lukasz
Division of Healthcare Engineering, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Carolina Health Informatics Program, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jan 19;10(1):e001377. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001377. eCollection 2025.
Burnout negatively impacts healthcare professionals' well-being, leading to an increased risk of human errors and patient harm. There are limited assessments of burnout and associated stressors among acute care and trauma surgery teams.
Acute care and trauma surgery team members at a US academic medical center were administered a survey that included a 2-item Maslach Burnout Inventory and 21 workplace stressors based on the National Academy of Medicine's systems model of clinician burnout and professional well-being. Stressors were summarized and presented to participants in focus groups. Contextual inquiries (CIs) were conducted to gather additional information about key stressors. Qualitative data were used to generate an affinity model, which participants then validated and used to prioritize top stressors. Participants rated stressors by level of impact and level of effort, and improvement recommendations were made based on these results.
74% (n=14/19) acute care and trauma surgery team members reported high burnout. Key stressors included inadequate staffing, organizational culture, excessive workload, and inefficient workflows. Attending faculty (surgeons) classified the following key priorities for improvement: (i) improve throughput and patient flow, (ii) provide better information technology support, and (iii) improve rewards and support. Non-faculty (advanced practice providers (APPs), nurses, staff) classified the following for improvement: (i) align APP job responsibilities, (ii) improve lack of recognition from leadership, and (iii) robust and consistent APP training.
A contextual design approach to studying burnout using surveys, focus groups, CIs, modeling, and validation and prioritization is a feasible method for identifying key stressors and improvements that may enable more impactful and appropriately targeted interventions. Results indicate high levels of burnout among acute care and trauma surgery team members, requiring prioritized attention to operational and relationship issues necessary to care for patients. Efforts to improve surgery teams' workflows, auxiliary support, compensation, and relationships with leadership may address burnout.
Level V.
职业倦怠对医疗保健专业人员的幸福感产生负面影响,导致人为错误和患者伤害的风险增加。对急诊和创伤外科团队中的职业倦怠及相关压力源的评估有限。
对美国一家学术医疗中心的急诊和创伤外科团队成员进行了一项调查,该调查包括一个由两项组成的马氏职业倦怠量表以及基于美国国家医学院临床医生职业倦怠和职业幸福感系统模型的21个工作场所压力源。对压力源进行了总结,并在焦点小组中向参与者展示。进行了情境调查以收集有关关键压力源的更多信息。定性数据用于生成一个亲和模型,参与者随后对该模型进行了验证,并用于确定主要压力源的优先级。参与者根据影响程度和努力程度对压力源进行评分,并根据这些结果提出改进建议。
74%(n = 14/19)的急诊和创伤外科团队成员报告有高度职业倦怠。关键压力源包括人员配备不足、组织文化、工作量过大和工作流程效率低下。主治教员(外科医生)将以下内容列为改进的关键优先事项:(i)提高工作效率和患者流程,(ii)提供更好的信息技术支持,以及(iii)改善奖励和支持。非教员(高级执业提供者(APP)、护士、工作人员)将以下内容列为改进事项:(i)明确APP的工作职责,(ii)改善领导层缺乏认可的情况,以及(iii)进行全面且一致的APP培训。
采用调查、焦点小组、情境调查、建模以及验证和优先级确定等方法,对职业倦怠进行情境化设计研究,是识别关键压力源和改进措施的可行方法,这些措施可能会促成更具影响力且目标明确的干预措施。结果表明急诊和创伤外科团队成员中职业倦怠程度较高,需要优先关注照顾患者所需的操作和关系问题。改善外科团队工作流程、辅助支持、薪酬以及与领导层关系的努力可能会解决职业倦怠问题。
V级。