• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国大学橄榄球首发球员的关键绩效指标:一项探索性研究。

Key Performance Indicators for College American Football Starters: An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Johnson Quincy R, Yang Yang, Cabarkapa Dimitrije, Stock Shane, Gleason Dalton, Akehi Kazuma, Sealey Dayton, Frels Clay, Smith Douglas B, Fry Andrew C

机构信息

Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.

Athletics Department, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE 68849, USA.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010019.

DOI:10.3390/jfmk10010019
PMID:39846660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11755533/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to profile body composition and physical fitness characteristics of collegiate American football starters and (b) to examine differences in key performance indicators across position groups. These indicators included select measures of body composition, joint kinematics, as well as muscular strength and power.

METHODS

Sixteen National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division-II American football athletes (age: 22.25 ± 1.1 years; height: 183.75 ± 7.8 cm; and body mass: 97.22 ± 20.39 kg) volunteered to participate in this study. A Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks test with Dunn test post-hoc adjustments was used to examine position differences between Line ( = 3), Big Skill ( = 6), and Skill ( = 7) position groups with α priori set at < 0.05.

RESULTS

The findings of this study suggest that significant differences in body composition ( = 0.004), muscular strength ( = 0.01), and muscular power ( = 0.03) exist between position groups. However, no significant differences were observed in joint kinematics as assessed by the bilateral squat test ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, key findings from this study suggest that although significant differences in body composition, muscular strength, and muscular power exist, an emphasis should be placed on the regular assessment, development, and maintenance of optimal joint kinematics within collegiate American football populations as this appears to be a shared key performance indicator among starters.

摘要

目的

本研究有两个目的:(a) 剖析美国大学橄榄球首发球员的身体成分和身体素质特征;(b) 检验各位置组关键绩效指标的差异。这些指标包括身体成分的选定测量指标、关节运动学指标以及肌肉力量和功率。

方法

16名美国国家大学体育协会(NCAA)二级橄榄球运动员(年龄:22.25±1.1岁;身高:183.75±7.8厘米;体重:97.22±20.39千克)自愿参与本研究。采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和单向方差分析及Dunn检验进行事后调整,以检验锋线组(n = 3)、大技巧组(n = 6)和技巧组(n = 7)之间的位置差异,α预先设定为<0.05。

结果

本研究结果表明,各位置组在身体成分(p = 0.004)、肌肉力量(p = 0.01)和肌肉功率(p = 0.03)方面存在显著差异。然而,通过双侧深蹲测试评估的关节运动学方面未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

因此,本研究的主要发现表明,尽管在身体成分、肌肉力量和肌肉功率方面存在显著差异,但应重视对美国大学橄榄球运动员群体中最佳关节运动学的定期评估、发展和维持,因为这似乎是首发球员共有的关键绩效指标。

相似文献

1
Key Performance Indicators for College American Football Starters: An Exploratory Study.美国大学橄榄球首发球员的关键绩效指标:一项探索性研究。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010019.
2
The effects of resistance training prioritization in NCAA Division I Football summer training.美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联盟橄榄球夏季训练中阻力训练优先级安排的效果
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jan;28(1):14-22. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182977e56.
3
Effect of Extreme Volume-Load Differences for a Single Unilateral Exercise During In-Season Resistance Training on Measures of Bilateral Strength, Power, and Speed in Collegiate American Football Players.赛季中阻力训练期间,单次单侧训练的极端容量负荷差异对美国大学橄榄球运动员双侧力量、功率和速度测量指标的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Jan 1;38(1):80-89. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004592. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
Career-Best Changes in Body Mass and Physical Fitness Test Performance Among Division 1 College Football Players Encompassing 28 Years at the Same Institution.同一机构28年间一级大学橄榄球运动员体重和体能测试成绩的生涯最佳变化
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Apr 1;37(4):806-815. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004326. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
Comparisons of Countermovement Jump Force-Time Characteristics Among National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I American Football Athletes: Use of Principal Component Analysis.比较美国大学生体育协会一级分区美式足球运动员的反跳力量-时间特征:主成分分析的应用。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Feb 1;36(2):411-419. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004173.
6
Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters for Starters vs. Nonstarters in an NCAA Division I Men's Lacrosse Team.比较 NCAA 一级男子长曲棍球队首发球员与非首发球员的体能参数。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Nov;32(11):3160-3168. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002830.
7
Revisiting the Assessment of Strength, Power, and Change of Direction in Collegiate American Football Athletes.重新评估大学生美式足球运动员的力量、功率和变向能力。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Aug 1;37(8):1623-1627. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004441. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
8
Positional Analysis of Body Composition Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football and Men's Lacrosse.应用双能 X 射线吸收法对美国大学生体育协会一级足球和男子长曲棍球项目运动员身体成分的位置分析。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jun 1;36(6):1699-1707. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003669. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Longitudinal effects of a collegiate strength and conditioning program in American football.大学橄榄球项目中力量与体能训练计划的纵向效果。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Sep;24(9):2300-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181dc4255.
10
Fat-Free Mass Index in a Large Sample of Collegiate American Football Athletes.大量美国大学橄榄球运动员样本中的去脂体重指数
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Jan 1;17(4):129-139. doi: 10.70252/FGRL8917. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in countermovement vertical jump force-time metrics between starting and non-starting professional male basketball players.职业男子篮球首发球员与非首发球员在反向纵跳力-时指标上的差异。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Dec 8;5:1327379. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1327379. eCollection 2023.
2
Vertical Jump Neuromuscular Performance Characteristics Determining On-Court Contribution in Male and Female NCAA Division 1 Basketball Players.垂直跳跃神经肌肉性能特征对美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联赛男女篮球运动员场上贡献的影响
Sports (Basel). 2023 Dec 4;11(12):239. doi: 10.3390/sports11120239.
3
Pre-Post Practice Changes in Countermovement Vertical Jump Force-Time Metrics in Professional Male Basketball Players.专业男性篮球运动员深蹲垂直跳力量-时间计量的前后练习变化。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Nov 1;37(11):e609-e612. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004608.
4
Position-specific differences in countermovement vertical jump force-time metrics in professional male basketball players.职业男性篮球运动员反向纵跳力-时间指标的特定位置差异。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jul 20;5:1218234. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1218234. eCollection 2023.
5
Inter-Device Reliability of a Three-Dimensional Markerless Motion Capture System Quantifying Elementary Movement Patterns in Humans.用于量化人体基本运动模式的三维无标记运动捕捉系统的设备间可靠性
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 May 22;8(2):69. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8020069.
6
Repeatability of Motion Health Screening Scores Acquired from a Three-Dimensional Markerless Motion Capture System.从三维无标记运动捕捉系统获得的运动健康筛查分数的可重复性
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Sep 2;7(3):65. doi: 10.3390/jfmk7030065.
7
Comparison of marker-less and marker-based motion capture for baseball pitching kinematics.无标记和基于标记的运动捕捉在棒球投球运动学方面的比较。
Sports Biomech. 2024 Dec;23(12):2950-2959. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2076608. Epub 2022 May 19.
8
Relationship between Health-Related Physical Fitness Parameters and Functional Movement Screening Scores Acquired from a Three-Dimensional Markerless Motion Capture System.基于三维无标记运动捕捉系统获取的健康相关体适能参数与功能性运动筛查评分之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;19(8):4551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084551.
9
Longitudinal Assessment of NCAA Division I Football Body Composition by Season and Player Age.按赛季和球员年龄对美国大学体育协会第一分区橄榄球运动员身体成分的纵向评估。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jun 1;36(6):1682-1690. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004256. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
10
Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework.定义培训和绩效水平:参与者分类框架。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):317-331. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451. Epub 2022 Dec 29.