Suppr超能文献

美国大学橄榄球首发球员的关键绩效指标:一项探索性研究。

Key Performance Indicators for College American Football Starters: An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Johnson Quincy R, Yang Yang, Cabarkapa Dimitrije, Stock Shane, Gleason Dalton, Akehi Kazuma, Sealey Dayton, Frels Clay, Smith Douglas B, Fry Andrew C

机构信息

Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.

Athletics Department, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE 68849, USA.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to profile body composition and physical fitness characteristics of collegiate American football starters and (b) to examine differences in key performance indicators across position groups. These indicators included select measures of body composition, joint kinematics, as well as muscular strength and power.

METHODS

Sixteen National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division-II American football athletes (age: 22.25 ± 1.1 years; height: 183.75 ± 7.8 cm; and body mass: 97.22 ± 20.39 kg) volunteered to participate in this study. A Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks test with Dunn test post-hoc adjustments was used to examine position differences between Line ( = 3), Big Skill ( = 6), and Skill ( = 7) position groups with α priori set at < 0.05.

RESULTS

The findings of this study suggest that significant differences in body composition ( = 0.004), muscular strength ( = 0.01), and muscular power ( = 0.03) exist between position groups. However, no significant differences were observed in joint kinematics as assessed by the bilateral squat test ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, key findings from this study suggest that although significant differences in body composition, muscular strength, and muscular power exist, an emphasis should be placed on the regular assessment, development, and maintenance of optimal joint kinematics within collegiate American football populations as this appears to be a shared key performance indicator among starters.

摘要

目的

本研究有两个目的:(a) 剖析美国大学橄榄球首发球员的身体成分和身体素质特征;(b) 检验各位置组关键绩效指标的差异。这些指标包括身体成分的选定测量指标、关节运动学指标以及肌肉力量和功率。

方法

16名美国国家大学体育协会(NCAA)二级橄榄球运动员(年龄:22.25±1.1岁;身高:183.75±7.8厘米;体重:97.22±20.39千克)自愿参与本研究。采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和单向方差分析及Dunn检验进行事后调整,以检验锋线组(n = 3)、大技巧组(n = 6)和技巧组(n = 7)之间的位置差异,α预先设定为<0.05。

结果

本研究结果表明,各位置组在身体成分(p = 0.004)、肌肉力量(p = 0.01)和肌肉功率(p = 0.03)方面存在显著差异。然而,通过双侧深蹲测试评估的关节运动学方面未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

因此,本研究的主要发现表明,尽管在身体成分、肌肉力量和肌肉功率方面存在显著差异,但应重视对美国大学橄榄球运动员群体中最佳关节运动学的定期评估、发展和维持,因为这似乎是首发球员共有的关键绩效指标。

相似文献

1
Key Performance Indicators for College American Football Starters: An Exploratory Study.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 3;10(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010019.
2
The effects of resistance training prioritization in NCAA Division I Football summer training.
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jan;28(1):14-22. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182977e56.
6
Comparison of Physical Fitness Parameters for Starters vs. Nonstarters in an NCAA Division I Men's Lacrosse Team.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Nov;32(11):3160-3168. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002830.
7
Revisiting the Assessment of Strength, Power, and Change of Direction in Collegiate American Football Athletes.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Aug 1;37(8):1623-1627. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004441. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
9
Longitudinal effects of a collegiate strength and conditioning program in American football.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Sep;24(9):2300-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181dc4255.
10
Fat-Free Mass Index in a Large Sample of Collegiate American Football Athletes.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Jan 1;17(4):129-139. doi: 10.70252/FGRL8917. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in countermovement vertical jump force-time metrics between starting and non-starting professional male basketball players.
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Dec 8;5:1327379. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1327379. eCollection 2023.
3
Pre-Post Practice Changes in Countermovement Vertical Jump Force-Time Metrics in Professional Male Basketball Players.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Nov 1;37(11):e609-e612. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004608.
4
Position-specific differences in countermovement vertical jump force-time metrics in professional male basketball players.
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jul 20;5:1218234. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1218234. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of marker-less and marker-based motion capture for baseball pitching kinematics.
Sports Biomech. 2024 Dec;23(12):2950-2959. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2076608. Epub 2022 May 19.
9
Longitudinal Assessment of NCAA Division I Football Body Composition by Season and Player Age.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jun 1;36(6):1682-1690. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004256. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
10
Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):317-331. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451. Epub 2022 Dec 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验