Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, The Research Centre, Belgrade, Serbia.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 Jun;119(6):1409-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04131-8. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
This study explored the acute effects of strength-oriented resistance training sessions performed using three different set configurations on barbell velocity and the force-velocity (F-v) relationship of upper-body muscles in men and women.
Thirteen men (age: 23.8 ± 2.5 years; 6-repetition maximum [6RM] load: 73.4 ± 15.6 kg) and 13 women (age: 21.5 ± 1.4 years; 6RM load: 32.8 ± 5.2 kg) performed 24 repetitions with a 6RM load during the bench press exercise using traditional (TR: 6 sets of 4 repetitions with 3 min of rest between sets), cluster (CL: 6 sets of 4 repetitions with 15 s of intra-set rest every two repetitions and 2 min and 45 s of rest between sets) and inter-repetition rest (IRR: 1 set of 24 repetitions with 39 s of rest between repetitions) set configurations. The F-v relationship parameters [maximum force (F), maximum velocity (v) and maximum power (P)] were determined before and after each training session.
The average training velocity did not differ between the three set configurations (p = 0.234), but the IRR set configuration generally provided higher velocities during the last repetition of each set. Significant decreases in F (p = 0.001) and P (p = 0.024) but not in v (p = 0.669) were observed after the training sessions. Comparable velocity loss was observed for men and women (- 12.1% vs. - 11.3%; p = 0.699).
The administration of very short intra-set rest periods does not allow for the attainment of higher velocities than traditional set configurations during strength-oriented resistance training sessions conducted with the bench press exercise when the work-to-rest ratio is equated.
本研究旨在探讨使用三种不同的杠铃设置配置进行力量型抗阻训练对男性和女性上半身肌肉的棒速和力速（F-v）关系的急性影响。
13 名男性（年龄：23.8±2.5 岁；6 次重复最大[6RM]负荷：73.4±15.6 公斤）和 13 名女性（年龄：21.5±1.4 岁；6RM 负荷：32.8±5.2 公斤）在卧推运动中使用传统（TR：6 组，每组 4 次重复，组间休息 3 分钟）、集群（CL：6 组，每组 4 次重复，每组每两次重复休息 15 秒，组间休息 2 分钟和 45 秒）和组间重复休息（IRR：1 组 24 次重复，组间休息 39 秒）设置配置完成 24 次重复。在每个训练课后，确定 F-v 关系参数[最大力（F）、最大速度（v）和最大功率（P）]。
三种设置配置的平均训练速度没有差异（p=0.234），但 IRR 设置配置通常在每组的最后一次重复中提供更高的速度。训练课后，F（p=0.001）和 P（p=0.024）显著下降（p=0.001），但 v 没有显著下降（p=0.669）。男性和女性的速度损失相似（-12.1%对-11.3%；p=0.699）。
在卧推运动中进行力量型抗阻训练时，当工作与休息的比例相同时，给予非常短的组内休息时间并不会比传统的设置配置获得更高的速度。
