Gatome-Munyua Agnes, Kutzin Joseph, Cashin Cheryl
Results for Development, Kenya.
Results for Development, Switzerland.
Health Syst Reform. 2024 Dec 18;10(3):2449905. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2025.2449905. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
The promise of contributory health insurance to generate additional, self-sustaining funding for the health sector has not been achieved in many low- and lower-middle-income countries. Instead, contributory health insurance has been found to exacerbate inequities in access to health care because entitlements are linked to contributions. For these countries with contributory health insurance schemes, with separate institutional arrangements for revenue collection and purchasing, that operate alongside budget-funded and other health financing schemes, it is usually not politically or technically feasible to reverse or eliminate these arrangements even when they fragment the health system. We propose three complementary policy options for countries in this difficult position to enable progress towards UHC: (1) Merge existing schemes into a single scheme (or fewer schemes) to consolidate pooling and purchasing functions. (2) Build on what they have by: reducing reliance on contributions by increasing budget transfers; using existing revenue collection mechanisms to allow the insurance agency to focus on the purchasing function; and strengthening insurance agencies' operational capacity for purchasing. (3) Reframe the insurance agency's role within the overall health system, rather than treating it as a distinct system by: unifying data collection and analysis for all patient visits irrespective of scheme membership, and universalizing core benefits across the population. We urge countries to review the patchwork of schemes and avoid worsening fragmentation that compromises health system performance. Countries can then create a strategy to expand coverage more equitably in a sequential manner, while consolidating institutional capacity for purchasing and unifying data systems.
在许多低收入和中低收入国家,社会医疗保险为卫生部门创造额外的、自我维持资金的承诺并未实现。相反,人们发现社会医疗保险会加剧获得医疗服务方面的不平等,因为福利与缴费挂钩。对于那些实行社会医疗保险计划、在税收征管和采购方面有单独制度安排、与预算资助及其他卫生筹资计划并行的国家来说,即使这些安排会使卫生系统碎片化,在政治上或技术上扭转或消除这些安排通常也是不可行的。我们为处于这种困境的国家提出三项互补的政策选择,以推动实现全民健康覆盖:(1)将现有计划合并为一个计划(或更少的计划),以整合统筹和采购职能。(2)在现有基础上:通过增加预算转移来减少对缴费的依赖;利用现有的税收征管机制,使保险机构能够专注于采购职能;并加强保险机构的采购业务能力。(3)在整个卫生系统中重新界定保险机构的角色,而不是将其视为一个独立的系统,方法是:统一所有患者就诊的数据收集和分析,无论其是否属于某个计划,并使全民享有核心福利。我们敦促各国审视这些拼凑的计划,避免加剧损害卫生系统绩效的碎片化状况。各国随后可以制定一项战略,以循序渐进的方式更公平地扩大覆盖范围,同时巩固采购机构能力并统一数据系统。