LaBella Michelle, Kelly Karen, Carlin Kristen, Walsh Elaine
Author Affiliations: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA (Mrs LaBella, Ms Kelly, Mrs Carlin, and Dr Walsh); and Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA (Mrs Carlin and Dr Walsh).
Adv Neonatal Care. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):92-98. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000001224. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
Finding an accurate and simple method of thermometry in the neonatal intensive care unit is important. The temporal artery thermometer (TAT) has been recommended for all ages by the manufacturer; however, there is insufficient evidence for the use of TAT in infants, especially to detect hypothermia.
To assess the accuracy of the TAT in hypothermic neonates in comparison to a rectal thermometer.
This study was a naturalistic, quantitative, and observational study. Temporal artery temperatures (using Exergen TemporalScanner 5000) were compared to rectal temperatures in critically ill infants in the neonatal intensive care unit undergoing therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Temperatures were taken during a 72-hour cooling period at 33.5 °C and a 6-hour rewarming period to normothermia of 36.5 °C. Nineteen patients and 1280 temperature measurements were included in this study.
During the cooling period, TAT and rectal temperatures had a weak correlation (r = 0.34, P < .001). The correlation during the rewarming period was much stronger (r = 0.70, P < .001), indicating less variability in measures, but not agreement. On average, regardless of period, the TAT temperatures read 0.43 °C (95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.49, P < .001) warmer than the rectal temperatures. The cooling or warming period had no effect on this difference between temperatures.
This study found that temperatures obtained with a TAT are generally warmer than the accepted standard core rectal temperature in hypothermic neonates, and we do not recommend its use in critically ill neonates who require accurate temperature readings.
在新生儿重症监护病房找到一种准确且简便的体温测量方法很重要。制造商推荐颞动脉体温计(TAT)适用于所有年龄段;然而,在婴儿中使用TAT的证据不足,尤其是用于检测体温过低。
与直肠体温计相比,评估TAT在体温过低新生儿中的准确性。
本研究为自然主义、定量和观察性研究。将新生儿重症监护病房中因缺氧缺血性脑病接受治疗性低温的危重症婴儿的颞动脉温度(使用Exergen TemporalScanner 5000)与直肠温度进行比较。在33.5°C的72小时降温期和恢复至36.5°C正常体温的6小时复温期测量温度。本研究纳入了19名患者和1280次温度测量。
在降温期,TAT温度与直肠温度的相关性较弱(r = 0.34,P <.001)。复温期的相关性更强(r = 0.70,P <.001),表明测量的变异性较小,但不一致。平均而言,无论时期如何,TAT温度比直肠温度高0.43°C(95%置信区间,0.37 - 0.49,P <.001)。降温或复温期对温度差异无影响。
本研究发现,在体温过低的新生儿中,TAT测得的温度通常高于公认的标准核心直肠温度,我们不建议在需要准确体温读数的危重症新生儿中使用它。