Suppr超能文献

头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗渗出性急性中耳炎的比较:初步报告。

Cefaclor compared with amoxycillin acute otitis media with effusion: a preliminary report.

作者信息

Bluestone C D, Beery Q C, Michaels R H, Zanotti M L, Stool S E, Grundfast K M, Wright C M, Mandel E M

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 1979;55 Suppl 4:42-9.

PMID:398480
Abstract

A double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing cefaclor with amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media with effusion (OME) in infants and children is being conducted at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. Although the randomization code has not yet been broken, the results of treating the first 55 children are reported, since they appear to be of interest. Of the 62 ears with acute OME on which an initial tympanocentesis was performed, 41 positive cultures were isolated from the middle ear aspirates. Of the 10 ears from which Haemophilus influenzae was isolated, one had a type b strain, and of the remaining unencapsulated strains, one was resistant to both penicillin G and ampicillin. In the one ear from which Staphylococcus aureus was isolated, the organism was found to be resistant to ampicillin. However, all of the organisms were sensitive in vitro to cefaclor. In 88% of all subjects observed for the first 2 weeks, the initial symptomatic response was excellent. Six children had persistent signs and symptoms of acute OME and received a second tympanocentesis; however, none of the effusions from the repeat aspiration revealed an organism. An effusion was still present in 97% of the ears after 3 days, in 69% after 2 weeks, and in 48% 6 weeks after initiation of the study. Tympanocentesis did not appear to affect either the initial clinical response or the persistence of effusion. There were no adverse reactions to either drug in this study. Because an apparent increase in the incidence of ampicillin-resistant strains of H. influenzae is being reported, and because of the presence of ampicillin-resistant S. aureus in some ears with acute OME, a new antimicrobial effective against all the common pathogens causing acute middle ear disease would be desirable. In this respect, the preliminary findings of treatment with cefaclor from this study appear promising.

摘要

匹兹堡儿童医院正在进行一项双盲随机临床试验,比较头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗婴幼儿急性分泌性中耳炎(OME)的效果。尽管随机分组代码尚未解密,但由于前55名儿童的治疗结果似乎很有意义,故予以报道。在62只进行了首次鼓膜穿刺术的急性OME耳朵中,从中耳抽吸物中分离出41份阳性培养物。在分离出流感嗜血杆菌的10只耳朵中,1只含有b型菌株,其余未包膜菌株中,1只对青霉素G和氨苄西林均耐药。在分离出金黄色葡萄球菌的1只耳朵中,该菌对氨苄西林耐药。然而,所有菌株在体外对头孢克洛均敏感。在观察的所有受试者中,88%在最初2周的症状反应良好。6名儿童有急性OME的持续体征和症状,并接受了第二次鼓膜穿刺术;然而,重复抽吸的积液中均未发现细菌。研究开始后3天,97%的耳朵仍有积液,2周后为69%,6周后为48%。鼓膜穿刺术似乎不影响最初的临床反应或积液的持续时间。本研究中两种药物均未出现不良反应。由于有报道称氨苄西林耐药的流感嗜血杆菌菌株发生率明显增加,且在一些急性OME耳朵中存在对氨苄西林耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌,因此需要一种对引起急性中耳疾病的所有常见病原体均有效的新型抗菌药物。在这方面,本研究中头孢克洛治疗的初步结果似乎很有前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验