Donzo Maja Wichhart, Forrester Nathaniel, Hu Chengcheng, Mize Brandi M, Duwayri Yazan, Vaughan Camille P, Alabi Olamide
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;113:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.066. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
The higher prevalence of multiple chronic conditions and frailty among older adults may increase the physiologic demand required for wound healing after a major lower extremity amputation (LEA). After below knee amputations (BKA), patients generally have improved prosthetic fitting rates, postoperative ambulation, and quality of life compared to an above knee amputation (AKA). However, the benefit of a BKA must be weighed against the risk of wound complications. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between advanced age and wound healing in our contemporary cohort of patients who underwent LEA.
Our study reviewed all patients who received LEA at 2 major academic healthcare systems between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients with prior ipsilateral LEA were excluded. The exposure of interest was advanced age, defined as age over 80 years old, and the primary outcome was time to wound healing (defined as clinical documentation of a healed amputation incision). Chi-squared test was used to evaluate advanced age and prosthetic fitting after LEA and Cox proportional hazard models were fit to examine the relationship between advanced age and time to wound healing after a LEA.
Among 597 patients who underwent LEA, 8.9% (n = 53) were over the age of 80. Over one-third of all patients underwent AKA (n = 235, 39.4%) and patients with advanced age represented 12.3% of this group. There was no statistically significant difference detected between the proportion of those with advanced age who were fit for prosthetic compared to those under age 79 who were fit for prosthetic (47.1% vs 58.5%, P = 0.11). The median time to wound healing was faster among those with advanced age, even when stratified by level of LEA (Table 1). Advanced age was associated with faster wound healing (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06-1.87).
In our cohort of patients, those with advanced age healed faster than their younger counterparts at both levels of LEA and were equally likely to receive a prosthetic after LEA. Age alone should not be used as a factor in determining eligibility to undergo LEA or receipt of prosthetic. Future studies will evaluate other clinical characteristics that are associated with successful wound healing among adults 80 and older.
老年人中多种慢性病和身体虚弱的患病率较高,这可能会增加下肢大截肢术后伤口愈合所需的生理需求。与膝上截肢(AKA)相比,膝下截肢(BKA)后患者的假肢适配率、术后行走能力和生活质量通常会有所改善。然而,BKA的益处必须与伤口并发症的风险相权衡。本研究的目的是在我们当代接受下肢截肢(LEA)的患者队列中,研究高龄与伤口愈合之间的关联。
我们的研究回顾了2015年1月至2022年12月期间在2个主要学术医疗系统接受LEA的所有患者。排除既往同侧LEA患者。感兴趣的暴露因素是高龄,定义为80岁以上,主要结局是伤口愈合时间(定义为截肢切口愈合的临床记录)。采用卡方检验评估LEA后高龄与假肢适配情况,并使用Cox比例风险模型来研究高龄与LEA后伤口愈合时间之间的关系。
在597例接受LEA的患者中,8.9%(n = 53)年龄超过80岁。超过三分之一的患者接受了AKA(n = 235,39.4%),高龄患者占该组的12.3%。与79岁以下适合安装假肢的患者相比,高龄适合安装假肢的患者比例之间没有统计学上的显著差异(47.1%对58.5%,P = 0.11)。即使按LEA水平分层,高龄患者的伤口愈合中位时间也更快(表1)。高龄与更快的伤口愈合相关(风险比[HR] 1.42;95% CI,1.06 - 1.87)。
在我们的患者队列中,高龄患者在LEA的两个水平上伤口愈合都比年轻患者快,并且在LEA后安装假肢的可能性相同。不应仅将年龄作为决定是否适合接受LEA或安装假肢的因素。未来的研究将评估与80岁及以上成年人伤口成功愈合相关的其他临床特征。