Suppr超能文献

心动过缓对心室不应期离散度的影响。

Effect of bradycardia on dispersion of ventricular refractoriness.

作者信息

Luck J C, Minor S T, Mann D E, Nielsen A P, Griffin J C, Wyndham C R

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1985 Apr 1;55(8):1009-14. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90736-2.

Abstract

The effect of bradycardia on dispersion of ventricular refractoriness was evaluated. Refractory periods were measured at 3 right ventricular sites in 16 patients with severe bradycardia (average heart rate 39 +/- 5 beats/min) and were compared with those measured in 11 control subjects, (average heart rate 72 +/- 12 beats/min). Patients with bradycardia had significantly longer effective (377 +/- 36 ms) and functional (421 +/- 39 ms) refractory periods (ERP and FRP) than control subjects (ERP 296 +/- 25 ms, FRP 346 +/- 18 ms) (p less than 0.001). However, dispersion of refractoriness was similar in the 2 groups. Dispersion of ERP was 43 +/- 38 ms and FRP was 48 +/- 35 ms in patients with bradycardia. In control subjects dispersion of ERP was 37 +/- 12 ms, and FRP was 36 +/- 20 ms. Pacing of 120 beats/min significantly decreased ERP and FRP in both groups. Pacing shortened dispersion significantly in control subjects. In patients with bradycardia, pacing failed to significantly decrease dispersion. Compared with control subjects with normal heart rates, patients with bradycardia have longer absolute refractory periods but do not have significantly increased dispersion of refractoriness. Single and double, twice threshold ventricular extrastimuli (S2 and S3) failed to induce ventricular tachycardia in any patient during bradycardia. Bradycardia alone does not appear to be a factor in the induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

摘要

评估了心动过缓对心室不应期离散度的影响。在16例严重心动过缓(平均心率39±5次/分钟)患者的3个右心室部位测量不应期,并与11例对照受试者(平均心率72±12次/分钟)的不应期进行比较。心动过缓患者的有效(377±36毫秒)和功能(421±39毫秒)不应期(ERP和FRP)明显长于对照受试者(ERP 296±25毫秒,FRP 346±18毫秒)(p<0.001)。然而,两组的不应期离散度相似。心动过缓患者的ERP离散度为43±38毫秒,FRP离散度为48±35毫秒。对照受试者的ERP离散度为37±12毫秒,FRP离散度为36±20毫秒。以120次/分钟的频率起搏显著降低了两组的ERP和FRP。起搏使对照受试者的离散度显著缩短。在心动过缓患者中,起搏未能显著降低离散度。与心率正常的对照受试者相比,心动过缓患者的绝对不应期更长,但不应期离散度没有显著增加。在心动过缓期间,单和双、两倍阈值的心室期外刺激(S2和S3)均未在任何患者中诱发室性心动过速。单独的心动过缓似乎不是诱发室性快速性心律失常的因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验