Heterogeneity of the Treatment Effect with PARP Inhibitors in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Living Interactive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Selection of patients harboring mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes for treatment with a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) is challenging in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To gain further insight, we quantitatively assessed the differential efficacy of PARPi therapy among patients with mCRPC and different HRR gene mutations.

METHODS

This living meta-analysis (LMA) was conducted using the Living Interactive Evidence synthesis framework. We included clinical trials assessing PARPi as monotherapy in pretreated mCRPC or in combination with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) in treatment-naïve patients. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for a priori subgroups stratified by HRR status, BRCA status, and each gene.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

This first report for our LMA includes 13 trials (4278 patients). Among patients with pretreated mCRPC receiving PARPi monotherapy, the tumor response rate per 100 person-months was numerically higher for patients with BRCA2 (50% prostate-specific antigen response [PSA50%] 3.3; objective response rate [ORR] 3.3), BRCA1 (PSA50% 1.2; ORR 2.0), or PALB2 (PSA50% 3.3; ORR 1.4) alterations than for patients with ATM (PSA50% 0.4; ORR 0.3), CDK12 (PSA50% 0.2; ORR 0.2), or CHEK2 (PSA50% 1.0; ORR 0.7) alterations. Among patients receiving PARPi + ARPI, a significant radiographic progression-free survival benefit was observed in those with BRCA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.62) or CDK12 (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.95) alterations, but not in patients with PALB2 (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.21-1.32), ATM (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.57-1.53), or CHEK2 (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.61) alterations. An overall survival benefit was observed for patients with BRCA alterations (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71) after adjustment for crossover and subsequent therapy, but not for patients with PALB2 (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.10-1.16), ATM (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.57-1.67), CDK12 (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36-1.78), or CHEK2 (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.37-1.75) alterations.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our LMA delivers information on the effect of PARPi therapy in relation to specific gene alterations in mCRPC via an interactive web platform. The evidence suggests the greatest PARPi benefit in patients with BRCA alterations, a strong signal of benefit in patients with PALB2 or CDK12 alterations, and no benefit in patients with ATM or CHEK2 alterations.