• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠和小鼠能快速更新定时行为。

Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors.

作者信息

Aggadi N, Krikawa S, Paine T A, Simen P, Howard C D

机构信息

Neuroscience Department, Oberlin College, 173 Lorain St, Oberlin, OH, USA.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2025 Jan 24;28(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01930-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-025-01930-9
PMID:39849294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11759285/
Abstract

Keeping track of time intervals is a crucial aspect of behavior and cognition. Many theoretical models of how the brain times behavior make predictions for steady-state performance of well-learned intervals, but the rate of learning intervals in these models varies greatly, ranging from one-shot learning to learning over thousands of trials. Here, we explored how quickly rats and mice adapt to changes in interval durations using a serial fixed-interval task. In the first experiment, animals experienced randomly selected fixed-intervals of 12, 24, 36, 48, or 60 s, for blocks ranging from 13 to 21 trials. Consistent with previous work, animals abruptly increased lever pressing as reward availability approached, and these 'start times' scaled with the interval duration for both species. We then quantified the rate of updating to new trial durations and found that rodents consistently updated their start times within 2-3 trials following a change in interval duration, before stabilizing their behavior by the third or fourth trial. To account for repeated exposures to fixed-interval durations, a second set of animals was tested with new fixed-intervals after being trained on the serial fixed-interval task described above. Next, a third group was trained on fixed-interval durations that were generated de novo in each day. In each of these contexts, rodents rapidly increased or decreased their start times to mirror new FI durations following exposure to 1-2 trials of new intervals following block transitions. This work adds to growing evidence for rapid duration learning across species, highlighting the need for timing models to be capable of rapid updating in dynamic temporal scenarios.

摘要

追踪时间间隔是行为和认知的一个关键方面。许多关于大脑如何对行为计时的理论模型对熟练掌握的时间间隔的稳态表现做出了预测,但这些模型中时间间隔的学习速率差异很大,从一次性学习到数千次试验的学习。在这里,我们使用串行固定间隔任务探索了大鼠和小鼠多快能适应间隔持续时间的变化。在第一个实验中,动物经历了随机选择的12、24、36、48或60秒的固定间隔,每个组块包含13到21次试验。与之前的研究一致,随着奖励可得性的临近,动物突然增加杠杆按压,并且这两个物种的这些“开始时间”都与间隔持续时间成比例。然后我们量化了更新到新试验持续时间的速率,发现啮齿动物在间隔持续时间变化后的2 - 3次试验内持续更新它们的开始时间,在第三次或第四次试验前稳定它们的行为。为了考虑对固定间隔持续时间的重复暴露,第二组动物在接受上述串行固定间隔任务训练后,用新的固定间隔进行测试。接下来,第三组动物在每天重新生成的固定间隔持续时间上进行训练。在这些每种情况下,啮齿动物在组块转换后接触1 - 2次新间隔试验后,迅速增加或减少它们的开始时间以反映新的固定间隔持续时间。这项工作为跨物种的快速持续时间学习增添了越来越多的证据,强调了计时模型在动态时间场景中能够快速更新的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/6d73e227b92a/10071_2025_1930_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/a54f04293e44/10071_2025_1930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/db15df3b0467/10071_2025_1930_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/2414106b2364/10071_2025_1930_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/1ba975088036/10071_2025_1930_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/6d73e227b92a/10071_2025_1930_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/a54f04293e44/10071_2025_1930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/db15df3b0467/10071_2025_1930_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/2414106b2364/10071_2025_1930_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/1ba975088036/10071_2025_1930_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/11759285/6d73e227b92a/10071_2025_1930_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rats and mice rapidly update timed behaviors.大鼠和小鼠能快速更新定时行为。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Jan 24;28(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01930-9.
2
The perception of empty and filled time intervals by rats.大鼠对空时间间隔和有内容时间间隔的感知。
Behav Processes. 2005 Nov 1;70(3):247-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.07.006.
3
What is timed in a fixed-interval temporal bisection procedure?在固定间隔时间二分程序中计时的是什么?
Learn Behav. 2016 Dec;44(4):366-377. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0228-z.
4
Surfacing of Latent Time Memories Supports the Representational Basis of Timing Behavior in Mice.潜在时间记忆的浮现支持了小鼠时间行为的表现基础。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Aug 29;27(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01889-z.
5
Activation of VTA GABA neurons disrupts reward seeking by altering temporal processing.腹侧被盖区 GABA 神经元的激活通过改变时间处理来破坏奖励寻求。
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Jul 23;410:113292. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113292. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
6
Temporal regularity and stimulus control in multiple fixed interval schedules.多重固定间隔程序中的时间规律性与刺激控制
Behav Processes. 2020 Feb;171:104019. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.104019. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
7
Interval timing by an invertebrate, the bumble bee Bombus impatiens.一种无脊椎动物——凤蝶 Bombus impatiens 的间隔计时。
Curr Biol. 2006 Aug 22;16(16):1636-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.064.
8
Temporal Averaging Across Stimuli Signaling the Same or Different Reinforcing Outcomes in the Peak Procedure.在峰值程序中,对发出相同或不同强化结果信号的刺激进行时间平均。
Int J Comp Psychol. 2015;28.
9
Effects of variable durations of food availability on interval time-place learning with pigeons Columba Livia.食物可获取时长变化对家鸽(Columba Livia)间隔时间-地点学习的影响
Behav Processes. 2020 Oct;179:104192. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104192. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Rats' performance on an interval time-place task: increasing sequence complexity.大鼠在间隔时间-地点任务中的表现:增加序列复杂性。
Learn Behav. 2006 Aug;34(3):248-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03192880.

本文引用的文献

1
Mice monitor their timing errors.老鼠会监测它们的时间误差。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 7;14(1):23356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71921-2.
2
Temporal scaling and computing time in neural circuits: Should we stop watching the clock and look for its gears?神经回路中的时间尺度与计算时间:我们是否应该不再看时钟,而去寻找其齿轮?
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Dec 8;16:1022713. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1022713. eCollection 2022.
3
Influence of Recent Trial History on Interval Timing.近期试验史对间隔计时的影响。
Neurosci Bull. 2023 Apr;39(4):559-575. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00954-2. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
4
Rodents monitor their error in self-generated duration on a single trial basis.啮齿动物在单次试验的基础上监测自身产生的持续时间误差。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 1;119(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108850119.
5
Rats can learn a temporal task in a single session.大鼠可以在一次训练中学会一项时间任务。
Behav Processes. 2020 Jan;170:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103986. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
Striatal dopamine and the temporal control of behavior.纹状体多巴胺与行为的时间控制。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Jan 1;356:375-379. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.08.030. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
7
The Neural Basis of Timing: Distributed Mechanisms for Diverse Functions.时间感知的神经基础:不同功能的分布式机制。
Neuron. 2018 May 16;98(4):687-705. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.045.
8
Nigrotectal Stimulation Stops Interval Timing in Mice.黑质顶盖刺激可停止小鼠的时间间隔计时。
Curr Biol. 2017 Dec 18;27(24):3763-3770.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
9
Seasonal reproductive tactics: annual timing and the capital-to-income breeder continuum.季节性生殖策略:年度时间安排和资本-收入育雏连续体。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 19;372(1734). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0250.
10
Dynamic Nigrostriatal Dopamine Biases Action Selection.动态黑质纹状体多巴胺偏向动作选择。
Neuron. 2017 Mar 22;93(6):1436-1450.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Mar 9.