Pacheco Catalina, Culkin Victoria, Putkaradze Amelia, Zeng Nan
Prevention Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jan 23;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01705-y.
Movement behaviors, including physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB), and sleep, are fundamental to early childhood development. These behaviors interact dynamically within a 24-hour period, creating a complex balance that influences not only physical health but also cognitive and emotional well-being in young children. While the physical health benefits of movement behaviors are well-documented, systematic evaluations of how interventions targeting these behaviors affect cognitive development in preschool-aged children remain limited.
This review was guided through PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the impact of interventions targeting PA, SB, and sleep on cognitive outcomes in preschool-aged children. A comprehensive search was performed across five databases: PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL, covering studies published between January 2000 and December 2023. Eligible studies were those that focused on at least one movement behavior, had a minimum intervention duration of four weeks, and assessed cognitive development as a primary outcome. The cognitive outcomes evaluated included executive function, attention, memory, and other key domains critical to early childhood development, such as language, processing speed, and social cognition.
Twenty-two RCTs (14 individual, 8 cluster) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 21 studies focused on PA, while only one targeted SB, and none specifically addressed sleep or combined movement behaviors. PA interventions, particularly those involving cognitively engaging activities, significantly improved cognitive domains such as executive function, inhibition, and attention, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large (Cohen's d > 0.5). The SB-focused study did not report significant cognitive improvements. A clear gap exists in understanding the effects of sleep and multi-behavior interventions on cognitive outcomes.
Cognitively engaging PA interventions demonstrated the largest effects, while motor skill-focused and general PA programs produced moderate to smaller gains. Evidence on SB and sleep interventions remains limited, with no studies exploring the combined effects of these three movement behaviors. Future research should focus on integrated interventions that address PA, SB, and sleep to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of their collective impact on cognitive development in early childhood.
This study was registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42023479156.
运动行为,包括体育活动(PA)、久坐行为(SB)和睡眠,对幼儿发育至关重要。这些行为在24小时内动态相互作用,形成一种复杂的平衡,不仅影响身体健康,还影响幼儿的认知和情感健康。虽然运动行为对身体健康的益处有充分记录,但针对这些行为的干预措施如何影响学龄前儿童认知发展的系统评价仍然有限。
本综述遵循PRISMA 2020指南进行。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价,以评估针对PA、SB和睡眠的干预措施对学龄前儿童认知结果的影响。在五个数据库中进行了全面检索:PubMed、PsycInfo、科学网、Embase和CINAHL,涵盖2000年1月至2023年12月发表的研究。符合条件的研究是那些关注至少一种运动行为、干预持续时间至少四周且将认知发展作为主要结果进行评估的研究。评估的认知结果包括执行功能、注意力、记忆力以及对幼儿发育至关重要的其他关键领域,如语言、处理速度和社会认知。
22项随机对照试验(14项个体试验、8项整群试验)符合纳入标准。其中,21项研究关注PA,而只有1项针对SB,没有研究专门涉及睡眠或综合运动行为。PA干预措施,特别是那些涉及认知参与活动的措施,显著改善了执行功能、抑制和注意力等认知领域,效应大小从中度到高度不等(科恩d值>0.5)。以SB为重点的研究未报告显著的认知改善。在理解睡眠和多行为干预对认知结果的影响方面存在明显差距。
认知参与性PA干预措施显示出最大的效果,而以运动技能为重点的和一般的PA项目产生的效果为中度到较小。关于SB和睡眠干预措施的证据仍然有限,没有研究探讨这三种运动行为的综合影响。未来的研究应侧重于解决PA、SB和睡眠问题的综合干预措施,以更全面地了解它们对幼儿认知发展的集体影响。
本研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42023479156。