Yi Guo-Zhong, Zhang Hua-Yang, Que Tian-Shi, Qu Shan-Qiang, Li Zhi-Yong, Qi Song-Tao, Feng Wen-Yan, Huang Guang-Long
Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Brain Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Avenue North No.1838, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Nanfang Glioma Center, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jan 23;30(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02306-y.
The identification of oncogenic gene fusions in diffuse gliomas may serve as potential therapeutic targets and prognostic indicators, representing a novel strategy for treating gliomas consistent with the principles of personalized medicine. This study identified detectable oncogene fusions in glioma patients through an integrated analysis of genomic and transcriptomic data, which encompassed whole exon sequencing and next-generation RNA sequencing. In addition, this study also conducted a comparison of the genetic characteristics, tumor microenvironment, mutation burden and survival between glioma patients with or without gene fusions. A total of 68 glioma patients were enrolled in this study, including glioblastoma (GBM), low grade glioma (LGG) and diffuse midline glioma (DMG). 14 cases of GBM patients (51.9%, 14/27) were found to harbor the following 70 oncogenic gene fusions: ROS1 (n = 8), NTRK (n = 5), KIF5 (n = 5), RET (n = 3) and other infrequent gene fusions (n = 49). A total of 11 gene fusions were identified in 8 LGG patients (32.0%, 8/25) and seven gene fusions were identified in one DMG patient (16.7%, 1/6). In GBM patient group, five genes including HOXA3, ACTB, CDK5, GNA12 and CARD11 exhibited a statistically significant higher copy number amplification frequency in the GBM group without gene fusions compared to that in the GBM group with gene fusions. In LGG patient group, CDK5 gene was also found to exhibit a statistically significant higher amplification frequency in the LGG group without gene fusions. In addition, KMT2D exhibited a statistically significant higher mutation frequency in the LGG group with gene fusions compared to that in the LGG group without gene fusions. Comparison of the other genetic characteristics including immune cell infiltration score, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). The results showed no statistically significant differences were observed between fusion and non-fusion group of GBM and LGG. The survival analysis revealed that GBM patients without gene fusions exhibited a longer median survival (737 days) compared to GBM patients with gene fusions (642 days), but without a statistical significancy. Our study has identified a set of gene fusions present in gliomas, including a number of novel gene fusions that have not been previously reported. We have also elucidated the underlying genetic characteristics of glioma with gene fusions. Collectively, our findings have the potential to inform future clinical treatment strategies for patients with glioma.
弥漫性胶质瘤中致癌基因融合的鉴定可作为潜在的治疗靶点和预后指标,代表了一种符合精准医学原则的治疗胶质瘤的新策略。本研究通过对基因组和转录组数据的综合分析,包括全外显子测序和下一代RNA测序,在胶质瘤患者中鉴定出可检测到的致癌基因融合。此外,本研究还比较了有或无基因融合的胶质瘤患者之间的遗传特征、肿瘤微环境、突变负荷和生存情况。本研究共纳入68例胶质瘤患者,包括胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)、低级别胶质瘤(LGG)和弥漫性中线胶质瘤(DMG)。在27例GBM患者中有14例(51.9%,14/27)被发现携带以下70种致癌基因融合:ROS1(n = 8)、NTRK(n = 5)、KIF5(n = 5)、RET(n = 3)和其他罕见基因融合(n = 49)。在25例LGG患者中有8例(32.0%,8/25)共鉴定出11种基因融合,在1例DMG患者(16.7%,1/6)中鉴定出7种基因融合。在GBM患者组中,与有基因融合的GBM组相比,包括HOXA3、ACTB、CDK5、GNA12和CARD11在内的5个基因在无基因融合的GBM组中表现出统计学上显著更高的拷贝数扩增频率。在LGG患者组中,也发现CDK5基因在无基因融合的LGG组中表现出统计学上显著更高的扩增频率。此外,与无基因融合的LGG组相比,KMT2D在有基因融合的LGG组中表现出统计学上显著更高的突变频率。对包括免疫细胞浸润评分、肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)和微卫星不稳定性(MSI)在内的其他遗传特征进行比较。结果显示,GBM和LGG的融合组与非融合组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。生存分析显示,无基因融合的GBM患者的中位生存期(737天)比有基因融合的GBM患者(642天)长,但无统计学意义。我们的研究鉴定出了一组存在于胶质瘤中的基因融合,包括一些以前未报道过的新型基因融合,并阐明了有基因融合的胶质瘤的潜在遗传特征。总体而言,我们的研究结果有可能为未来胶质瘤患者的临床治疗策略提供参考。