Shin Sang-Jin, Lee Sanghyeon
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Mar;53(3):583-591. doi: 10.1177/03635465241311593. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
To achieve successful anatomic rotator cuff repair with minimal tension, both the tear pattern and tear size should be considered. However, little information is available concerning the frequency of tear patterns and their effects on tendon healing.
To evaluate the distribution of tear patterns in full-thickness rotator cuff tears and whether these patterns affect tendon healing after arthroscopic repair.
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Between 2014 and 2021, patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears with a minimum 2-year follow-up with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound were retrospectively reviewed. After the debridement of degenerative tendon tissue during arthroscopic surgery, the tear pattern was classified as crescent, U, or anterior or posterior L shaped. Intergroup differences in clinical and radiological characteristics were analyzed. In the subgroup analysis, patients were divided into 2 subgroups: small-to-medium or large-to-massive tears.
Among the 1037 patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, the most common tear pattern was crescent shaped (39.6%), followed by posterior L, U, and anterior L shaped (26.0%, 21.4%, and 12.9%, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, 713 patients (68.8%) had small-to-medium tears, while 324 (31.2%) had large-to-massive tears. The proportion of large-to-massive tears was significantly higher for the anterior L-shaped tear pattern than for the other tear patterns (24.8%, 28.8%, 52.2%, and 32.6% for crescent, U, and anterior and posterior L shaped, respectively; < .001). The anterior L-shaped tear pattern had a significantly higher retear rate than the other tear patterns in small-to-medium tears (7.8%, 13.0%, 28.0%, and 10.6% for crescent, U, and anterior and posterior L shaped, respectively; < .001). The rate of revision surgery because of a symptomatic retear within 2 years after primary surgery was significantly higher for the anterior L-shaped tear pattern than for the other tear patterns (3.8%, 7.5%, 21.6%, and 0.0% for crescent, U, and anterior and posterior L shaped, respectively; = .002).
The prevalence of tear patterns varied depending on the tear size. In small-to-medium tears, the anterior L-shaped tear pattern had the lowest incidence among the tear patterns; however, it had a significantly higher retear rate. Furthermore, the anterior L-shaped tear pattern had a higher incidence of retears requiring early revision surgery than the other tear patterns.
为了在最小张力下成功进行解剖学肩袖修复,应同时考虑撕裂模式和撕裂大小。然而,关于撕裂模式的频率及其对肌腱愈合的影响,目前可用信息较少。
评估全层肩袖撕裂中撕裂模式的分布情况,以及这些模式在关节镜修复后是否会影响肌腱愈合。
病例对照研究;证据等级为3级。
回顾性分析2014年至2021年间因有症状的全层肩袖撕裂接受关节镜手术且术后至少随访2年并进行了术后磁共振成像或超声检查的患者。在关节镜手术中对退变的肌腱组织进行清创后,将撕裂模式分为新月形、U形或前或后L形。分析临床和放射学特征的组间差异。在亚组分析中,患者被分为两个亚组:小至中等或大至巨大撕裂。
在1037例全层肩袖撕裂患者中,最常见的撕裂模式是新月形(39.6%),其次是后L形、U形和前L形(分别为26.0%、21.4%和12.9%)。在亚组分析中,713例患者(68.8%)为小至中等撕裂,而324例(31.2%)为大至巨大撕裂。前L形撕裂模式中大至巨大撕裂的比例显著高于其他撕裂模式(新月形、U形、前L形和后L形分别为24.8%、28.8%、52.2%和32.6%;P <.001)。在前L形撕裂模式中,小至中等撕裂的再撕裂率显著高于其他撕裂模式(新月形、U形、前L形和后L形分别为7.8%、13.0%、28.0%和10.6%;P <.001)。初次手术后2年内因有症状的再撕裂而进行翻修手术的比例,前L形撕裂模式显著高于其他撕裂模式(新月形、U形、前L形和后L形分别为3.8%、7.5%、21.6%和0.0%;P =.002)。
撕裂模式的患病率因撕裂大小而异。在小至中等撕裂中,前L形撕裂模式在所有撕裂模式中发病率最低;然而,其再撕裂率显著更高。此外,与其他撕裂模式相比,前L形撕裂模式因再撕裂需要早期翻修手术的发生率更高。