Oklaz Ethem Burak, Kanatli Ulunay, Aral Furkan, Duzgun Ramazan, Ak Oguzhan, Calta Muhammed Sakir, Cavusoglu Ali Turgay
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul;33(7):2626-2632. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12640. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
To evaluate the relationship between delamination and tear patterns in degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for rotator cuff tears between December 2020 and September 2024. The study included chronic, degenerative, full-thickness rotator cuff tears without concomitant shoulder pathology. Patients were grouped based on the presence of delamination, defined as the horizontal cleavage of the torn tendons. Age, sex, dominant extremity, symptom duration, amount of retraction, tear width and tear pattern (crescent-shaped, anterior L-shaped, posterior L-shaped and U-shaped) were compared between groups. Regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors that may be associated with the presence of delamination.
The study included 130 patients, 75 with delamination (mean age 61.1 ± 8.8 years) and 55 without (mean age 61.1 ± 8.3 years). Demographic characteristics were similar among patients with and without delamination. The rate of anterior and posterior L-shaped tears was significantly higher in delaminated tears (24% and 33%, respectively) compared to non-delaminated tears (6% and 9%, respectively) (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). Regression analysis demonstrated that anterior L-shaped tears and posterior L-shaped tears were significantly related to delamination (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively).
This study demonstrates that anterior and posterior L-shaped tear patterns are significantly associated with delamination in degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
评估退行性全层肩袖撕裂中分层与撕裂模式之间的关系。
本回顾性队列研究对2020年12月至2024年9月期间因肩袖撕裂接受肩关节镜检查的患者进行。该研究纳入了无合并肩部病变的慢性、退行性、全层肩袖撕裂患者。根据是否存在分层(定义为撕裂肌腱的水平裂开)对患者进行分组。比较两组之间的年龄、性别、优势肢体、症状持续时间、回缩量、撕裂宽度和撕裂模式(新月形、前L形、后L形和U形)。进行回归分析以确定可能与分层存在相关的危险因素。
该研究纳入了130例患者,75例有分层(平均年龄61.1±8.8岁),55例无分层(平均年龄61.1±8.3岁)。有分层和无分层的患者人口统计学特征相似。与无分层的撕裂(分别为6%和9%)相比,分层撕裂中前L形和后L形撕裂的发生率显著更高(分别为24%和33%)(p分别为0.003和0.001)。回归分析表明,前L形撕裂和后L形撕裂与分层显著相关(p分别为0.002和0.001)。
本研究表明,在退行性全层肩袖撕裂中,前L形和后L形撕裂模式与分层显著相关。
III级,回顾性队列研究。