• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤患者基于血液白细胞的细胞群

Blood leukocyte-based clusters in patients with traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Wang Ruoran, Xu Jianguo, He Min

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1504668. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1504668. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1504668
PMID:39850895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11754042/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Leukocytes play an important role in inflammatory response after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). We designed this study to identify TBI phenotypes by clustering blood levels of various leukocytes.

METHODS

TBI patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) database were included. Blood levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, and eosinophils were collected by analyzing the first blood sample within 24 h since admission. Overall, TBI patients were divided into clusters following the K-means clustering method using blood levels of five types of leukocytes. The correlation between identified clusters and mortality was tested by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to verify the survival difference between identified TBI clusters.

RESULTS

A total of 172 (cluster 1), 791 (cluster 2), and 636 (cluster 3) TBI patients were divided into three clusters with the following percentages, 10.8%, 49.5%, and 39.8%, respectively. Cluster 1 had the lowest Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the highest Injury Severity Score (ISS) while cluster 2 had the highest GCS and the lowest ISS. The mortality rates of the three clusters were 25.6%, 13.3%, and 18.1%, respectively. The multivariate logistic regression indicated that cluster 1 had a higher mortality risk (OR = 2.211, p = 0.003) than cluster 2, while cluster 3 did not show a significantly higher mortality risk than cluster 2 (OR = 1.285, p = 0.163). Kapan-Meier analysis showed that cluster 1 had shorter survival than cluster 2 and cluster 3.

CONCLUSION

Three TBI phenotypes with different inflammatory statuses and mortality rates were identified based on blood levels of leukocytes. This classification is helpful for physicians to evaluate the prognosis of TBI patients.

摘要

背景

白细胞在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的炎症反应中起重要作用。我们设计了本研究,通过对各种白细胞的血液水平进行聚类来识别TBI的表型。

方法

纳入重症监护医学信息数据库-III(MIMIC-III)中的TBI患者。通过分析入院后24小时内的第一份血液样本,收集中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞的血液水平。总体而言,使用五种白细胞的血液水平,按照K均值聚类方法将TBI患者分为不同的聚类。通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析检验所识别聚类与死亡率之间的相关性。采用Kaplan-Meier方法验证所识别的TBI聚类之间的生存差异。

结果

总共172例(聚类1)、791例(聚类2)和636例(聚类3)TBI患者被分为三个聚类,其百分比分别为10.8%、49.5%和39.8%。聚类1的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)最低,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)最高,而聚类2的GCS最高,ISS最低。三个聚类的死亡率分别为25.6%、13.3%和18.1%。多因素逻辑回归表明,聚类1的死亡风险高于聚类2(OR = 2.211,p = 0.003),而聚类3的死亡风险与聚类2相比没有显著升高(OR = 1.285,p = 0.163)。Kaplan-Meier分析表明,聚类1的生存期短于聚类2和聚类3。

结论

基于白细胞的血液水平,识别出了三种具有不同炎症状态和死亡率的TBI表型。这种分类有助于医生评估TBI患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/5967397684a5/fimmu-15-1504668-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/5cc005d92048/fimmu-15-1504668-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/94958d0f2095/fimmu-15-1504668-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/63361dc267fd/fimmu-15-1504668-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/552b67286650/fimmu-15-1504668-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/5967397684a5/fimmu-15-1504668-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/5cc005d92048/fimmu-15-1504668-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/94958d0f2095/fimmu-15-1504668-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/63361dc267fd/fimmu-15-1504668-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/552b67286650/fimmu-15-1504668-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/11754042/5967397684a5/fimmu-15-1504668-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Blood leukocyte-based clusters in patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者基于血液白细胞的细胞群
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1504668. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1504668. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Liver fibrosis score is associated with the mortality of traumatic brain injury patients.肝纤维化评分与创伤性脑损伤患者的死亡率相关。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Aug 15;46(1):201. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02095-0.
4
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity.简化创伤性脑损伤的预后信息使用。第 1 部分:GCS-瞳孔评分:临床严重程度的扩展指标。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1612-1620. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172780. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
IMPACT probability of poor outcome and plasma cytokine concentrations are associated with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后,预后不良的可能性和血浆细胞因子浓度与多器官功能障碍综合征有关。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jan 11;131(6):1931-1937. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS18676. Print 2019 Dec 1.
6
Association of glycemic variability and prognosis in patients with traumatic brain injury: A retrospective study from the MIMIC-IV database.血糖变异性与创伤性脑损伤患者预后的相关性:来自 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性研究。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Nov;217:111869. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111869. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
7
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Graphical presentation of probabilities.简化创伤性脑损伤预后信息的使用。第 2 部分:概率的图形表示。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1621-1634. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172782. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
8
Assessing outcomes in traumatic brain injury: Helsinki score versus Glasgow coma scale.创伤性脑损伤结局评估:赫尔辛基评分与格拉斯哥昏迷评分。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2491-2499. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02604-w. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
9
Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study.聚类分析确定了重症监护队列中创伤性脑损伤的表型:CENTER-TBI 研究。
Crit Care. 2022 Jul 27;26(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w.
10
Using components of the Glasgow coma scale and Rotterdam CT scores for mortality risk stratification in adult patients with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study.使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表和鹿特丹 CT 评分的组合对创伤性脑损伤成年患者进行死亡率风险分层:一项初步研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;188:105599. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105599. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying molecular phenotypes in sepsis: an analysis of two prospective observational cohorts and secondary analysis of two randomised controlled trials.鉴定脓毒症的分子表型:两项前瞻性观察队列研究的分析和两项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Nov;11(11):965-974. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00237-0. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
2
Representation Learning and Spectral Clustering for the Development and External Validation of Dynamic Sepsis Phenotypes: Observational Cohort Study.基于表示学习和谱聚类的动态脓毒症表型的构建和外部验证:观察性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 23;25:e45614. doi: 10.2196/45614.
3
Unsupervised clustering identifies sub-phenotypes and reveals novel outcome predictors in patients with dialysis-requiring sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.
无监督聚类可识别亚表型,并揭示透析相关性脓毒症相关急性肾损伤患者的新结局预测指标。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2197290. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2197290.
4
Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio in severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及中性粒细胞与单核细胞比值在重度创伤性脑损伤中的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
J Neurosurg Sci. 2024 Oct;68(5):604-611. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.05877-0. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
5
Systemic immune inflammation index and peripheral blood carbon dioxide concentration at admission predict poor prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.入院时的全身免疫炎症指数和外周血二氧化碳浓度可预测严重创伤性脑损伤患者的预后不良。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1034916. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1034916. eCollection 2022.
6
Longitudinal phenotypes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multi-database study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的纵向表型:多数据库研究。
Crit Care. 2022 Nov 4;26(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04211-w.
7
A Novel Blood Inflammatory Indicator for Predicting Deterioration Risk of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.一种预测轻度创伤性脑损伤恶化风险的新型血液炎症指标。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Apr 26;14:878484. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.878484. eCollection 2022.
8
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict prognosis in traumatic brain injury.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值预测创伤性脑损伤的预后
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;56:341. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
9
Prognostic value of leukocytosis in pediatric traumatic brain injury.白细胞增多症对儿科创伤性脑损伤的预后价值。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020 Dec 25;27(3):335-345. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.PEDS19627. Print 2021 Mar 1.
10
Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury.估计创伤性脑损伤的全球发病率。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. Print 2019 Apr 1.