Roscoe W R, Snyder A C
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Feb;62(2):129-31. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198502000-00011.
The oxygen quantifying techniques of Hill and Rasson and Fatt have been compared by Roscoe and Wilson, who have also derived an "average" equivalent oxygen percentage (EOP) calibration equation. This study provides additional data which support their conclusions. Eight subjects wore three different hydrogel contact lens types of various center thicknesses and oxygen transmissibilities. Open-eyelid oxygen polarographic data were taken for each of these lenses worn by the subjects. The "average" EOP calibration equation was used to calculate the EOP values. The relation between center thickness and the ratio of the oxygen tension values derived by the two methods agrees relatively well with that found previously.
罗斯科和威尔逊比较了希尔、拉森以及法特的氧气量化技术，他们还推导了一个“平均”等效氧百分比（EOP）校准方程。本研究提供了更多支持他们结论的数据。八名受试者佩戴了三种不同中心厚度和透氧性的水凝胶隐形眼镜。对受试者佩戴的每种隐形眼镜获取了睁眼状态下的氧极谱数据。使用“平均”EOP校准方程来计算EOP值。两种方法得出的中心厚度与氧分压值之比之间的关系与之前发现的关系相当吻合。
