Chan C, Smith G, Jacobs R J
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Mar;62(3):207-16.
There are two principal methods of simulating refractive errors. Either the retinal image can be defocused by an optical system, usually a positive lens, placed in front of an observer's eye (observer method), or the source of the retinal image can be defocused as it is projected onto a screen or photograph (source method). There are significant differences between the two methods, differences that make it difficult to compare results. However, the source method, which is the more artificial, seems to be superior for a number of reasons. The results of these two methods can be compared using a common or interchangeable parameter for specifying the level of defocus. A convenient parameter is the size of the defocused image of a point, measured either in image space (linear or angular diameter on the retina) or in object space (angular diameter of the blur disc projected back into object space), with the angular diameter measured from the respective nodal point of the eye. Methods of measuring the angular blur-disc diameter for both methods are discussed and the validity of the formula omega = D delta L, is investigated, where omega is the angular diameter of the blur disc, D is the observer's pupil diameter, and delta L is the dioptric defocus.
模拟屈光不正主要有两种方法。一种是通过置于观察者眼前的光学系统(通常是正透镜)使视网膜图像散焦(观察者方法),另一种是在视网膜图像投影到屏幕或照片上时使其散焦(源方法)。这两种方法存在显著差异,这些差异使得结果难以比较。然而,源方法虽然较为人为,但基于一些原因似乎更具优势。可以使用一个通用或可互换的参数来指定散焦程度,从而比较这两种方法的结果。一个方便的参数是点的散焦图像的大小,可在像空间(视网膜上的线性或角直径)或物空间(投影回物空间的模糊斑的角直径)中测量,角直径是从眼睛相应的节点测量的。讨论了两种方法测量角模糊斑直径的方法,并研究了公式ω = DΔL的有效性,其中ω是模糊斑的角直径,D是观察者的瞳孔直径,ΔL是屈光度散焦。