Kiraz Umay, Rewcastle Emma, Fykse Silja K, Lundal Ingrid, Gudlaugsson Einar G, Skaland Ivar, Søiland Håvard, Baak Jan P A, Janssen Emiel A M
Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.
Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Engineering, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jan 10;12(1):54. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010054.
A subset of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) expresses the androgen receptor (AR), but thresholds for AR positivity and its clinical significance vary. We hypothesize that objective assessment outperforms subjective methods, and that high AR negatively impacts prognosis. In a population-based TNBC cohort ( = 198) with long follow-up (4-383 months), AR expression was evaluated via subjective scoring (AR-Manual) and automated digital image analysis (AR-DIA). A 10% cut-off value via AR-DIA was the strongest negative prognostic threshold for distant metastases ( = 0.008). High AR-DIA correlated with lower grade ( = 0.014), and lower proliferation ( = 0.004) but also with larger tumors ( = 0.047), distant metastasis ( = 0.052), and lymph node (LN) positivity ( < 0.001), highlighting its dual roles. Multivariate analysis revealed interaction between LN status and AR-DIA ( < 0.001) as the strongest prognostic factor, followed by fibrotic focus (FF; = 0.009), mitotic activity index (MAI; = 0.018), and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs; = 0.041). AR-DIA had no additional prognostic value in favorable subgroups but was significant in unfavorable subgroups. In high AR-DIA patients with unfavorable characteristics, ACT did not improve survival, and patients may benefit from AR-targeted therapy. Overall, the DIA method provides reproducibility, high AR-DIA (≥10%) shows opposing survival effects in different TNBC subgroups, and AR evaluation is crucial for prognosis and AR-targeted therapies.
三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的一个亚群表达雄激素受体(AR),但AR阳性的阈值及其临床意义各不相同。我们假设客观评估优于主观方法,且高AR对预后有负面影响。在一个具有长期随访(4 - 383个月)的基于人群的TNBC队列(n = 198)中,通过主观评分(AR - Manual)和自动数字图像分析(AR - DIA)评估AR表达。通过AR - DIA得出的10%截断值是远处转移最强的阴性预后阈值(P = 0.008)。高AR - DIA与低分级(P = 0.014)、低增殖(P = 0.004)相关,但也与更大的肿瘤(P = 0.047)、远处转移(P = 0.052)和淋巴结(LN)阳性(P < 0.001)相关,凸显了其双重作用。多变量分析显示LN状态与AR - DIA之间的相互作用(P < 0.001)是最强的预后因素,其次是纤维化灶(FF;P = 0.009)、有丝分裂活性指数(MAI;P = 0.018)和基质肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(sTILs;P = 0.041)。AR - DIA在有利亚组中没有额外的预后价值,但在不利亚组中具有显著性。在具有不利特征的高AR - DIA患者中,辅助化疗(ACT)并未改善生存率,患者可能从AR靶向治疗中获益。总体而言,DIA方法具有可重复性,高AR - DIA(≥10%)在不同的TNBC亚组中显示出相反的生存效应,并且AR评估对于预后和AR靶向治疗至关重要。