Suppr超能文献

骨修饰剂对不同癌症类型骨转移后生存的影响。

Impact of Bone-Modifying Agents on Post-Bone Metastasis Survival Across Cancer Types.

作者信息

Tamiya Hironari, Nishino Kazumi, Kato Yuji, Nakahashi-Kato Reina, Kosuga-Tsujimoto Yurika, Kinoshita Shota, Suzuki Rie, Watanabe Makiyo, Wakamatsu Toru, Kakunaga Shigeki, Takenaka Satoshi

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2025 Jan 15;32(1):42. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32010042.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bone metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis. Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are commonly used for the prevention or treatment of skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with bone metastasis; however, whether or not treatment with BMA improves survival remains unclear. In this study, we investigated whether BMA was involved in post-bone metastasis survival.

METHODS

A total of 539 cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed to identify significant independent factors in post-bone metastasis survival.

RESULTS

Among the overall population, patients with the following cancers had a median survival longer than 24 months: thyroid, 97.2 months; breast, 51.5 months; prostate, 47.2 months; and kidney, 38.8 months. In contrast, median post-bone metastasis survival was significantly shorter in gastrointestinal (GI) (6.5 months), head and neck (6.3 months), and urinary tract (3.4 months) cancers. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the log-rank test demonstrated that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was a significant factor for post-bone metastasis survival: EGFR mutation (-) = 67, median post-bone metastasis survival 11.5 months (95% CI: 6.0-15.2); EGFR mutation (+) = 39, median post-bone metastasis survival 28.8 months (95% CI: 18.1-35.7) ( < 0.05). Intriguingly, treatment with BMA was a significant positive prognostic factor: BMA (-) = 203, median post-bone metastasis survival 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.8-12.5); BMA (+) = 336, median post-bone metastasis survival 21.9 months (95% CI: 16.1-26.4) ( < 0.001). Moreover, the Cox proportional hazards model showed that this was particularly evident in cancer types with poor prognosis such as GI cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.40-0.95; < 0.05) and NSCLC without the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.91; < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with BMA is recommended not only for the prevention and/or treatment of SRE, but also may have a positive impact on post-bone metastasis survival, particularly in cancers with typically poor post-bone metastasis survival such as GI cancer and NSCLC without the EGFR mutation.

摘要

背景

骨转移与预后不良相关。骨改良药物(BMA)常用于预防或治疗骨转移患者的骨相关事件(SRE);然而,BMA治疗是否能改善生存率仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了BMA是否与骨转移后的生存有关。

方法

对539例癌症患者进行回顾性分析,以确定骨转移后生存的显著独立因素。

结果

在总体人群中,以下癌症患者的中位生存期超过24个月:甲状腺癌,97.2个月;乳腺癌,51.5个月;前列腺癌,47.2个月;肾癌,38.8个月。相比之下,胃肠道(GI)癌(6.5个月)、头颈癌(6.3个月)和泌尿系统癌(3.4个月)骨转移后的中位生存期明显较短。在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,对数秩检验表明表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变是骨转移后生存的一个重要因素:EGFR突变(-)=67例,骨转移后中位生存期11.5个月(95%CI:6.0-15.2);EGFR突变(+)=39例,骨转移后中位生存期28.8个月(95%CI:18.1-35.7)(P<0.05)。有趣的是,BMA治疗是一个显著的阳性预后因素:BMA(-)=203例,骨转移后中位生存期7.8个月(95%CI:5.8-12.5);BMA(+)=336例,骨转移后中位生存期21.9个月(95%CI:16.1-26.4)(P<0.001)。此外,Cox比例风险模型显示,这在预后较差的癌症类型中尤为明显,如GI癌(风险比[HR]:0.62,95%CI:0.40-0.95;P<0.05)和无表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的NSCLC(HR:0.56,95%CI:0.34-0.91;P<0.05)。

结论

推荐使用BMA进行治疗,不仅用于预防和/或治疗SRE,而且可能对骨转移后的生存有积极影响,特别是在骨转移后生存通常较差的癌症中,如GI癌和无EGFR突变的NSCLC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1611/11764064/938cb3a967ab/curroncol-32-00042-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验