• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于体外受精胚胎选择的联合输入深度学习管道,使用光学显微镜图像和附加特征

Combined Input Deep Learning Pipeline for Embryo Selection for In Vitro Fertilization Using Light Microscopic Images and Additional Features.

作者信息

Onthuam Krittapat, Charnpinyo Norrawee, Suthicharoenpanich Kornrapee, Engphaiboon Supphaset, Siricharoen Punnarai, Chaichaowarat Ronnapee, Suebthawinkul Chanakarn

机构信息

International School of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Imaging. 2025 Jan 7;11(1):13. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11010013.

DOI:10.3390/jimaging11010013
PMID:39852326
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11765875/
Abstract

The current process of embryo selection in in vitro fertilization is based on morphological criteria; embryos are manually evaluated by embryologists under subjective assessment. In this study, a deep learning-based pipeline was developed to classify the viability of embryos using combined inputs, including microscopic images of embryos and additional features, such as patient age and developed pseudo-features, including a continuous interpretation of Istanbul grading scores by predicting the embryo stage, inner cell mass, and trophectoderm. For viability prediction, convolution-based transferred learning models were employed, multiple pretrained models were compared, and image preprocessing techniques and hyperparameter optimization via Optuna were utilized. In addition, a custom weight was trained using a self-supervised learning framework known as the Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations (SimCLR) in cooperation with generated images using generative adversarial networks (GANs). The best model was developed from the EfficientNet-B0 model using preprocessed images combined with pseudo-features generated using separate EfficientNet-B0 models, and optimized by Optuna to tune the hyperparameters of the models. The designed model's F1 score, accuracy, sensitivity, and area under curve (AUC) were 65.02%, 69.04%, 56.76%, and 66.98%, respectively. This study also showed an advantage in accuracy and a similar AUC when compared with the recent ensemble method.

摘要

目前体外受精中的胚胎选择过程基于形态学标准;胚胎由胚胎学家在主观评估下进行人工评估。在本研究中,开发了一种基于深度学习的流程,使用包括胚胎显微图像和其他特征(如患者年龄)以及通过预测胚胎阶段、内细胞团和滋养外胚层对伊斯坦布尔分级分数进行连续解释而生成的伪特征等组合输入来对胚胎的活力进行分类。对于活力预测,采用了基于卷积的迁移学习模型,比较了多个预训练模型,并利用图像预处理技术和通过Optuna进行超参数优化。此外,使用称为视觉表征对比学习简单框架(SimCLR)的自监督学习框架与使用生成对抗网络(GAN)生成的图像合作训练了一个自定义权重。最佳模型是从EfficientNet - B0模型开发而来,使用预处理图像与使用单独的EfficientNet - B0模型生成的伪特征相结合,并通过Optuna进行优化以调整模型的超参数。设计模型的F1分数、准确率、灵敏度和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为65.02%、69.04%、56.76%和66.98%。与最近的集成方法相比,本研究在准确率方面也显示出优势,且AUC相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/eec17f87e355/jimaging-11-00013-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/67710058e0e8/jimaging-11-00013-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/13b1d3a726ad/jimaging-11-00013-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/a13dc8ca57f8/jimaging-11-00013-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/eec17f87e355/jimaging-11-00013-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/67710058e0e8/jimaging-11-00013-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/13b1d3a726ad/jimaging-11-00013-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/a13dc8ca57f8/jimaging-11-00013-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086b/11765875/eec17f87e355/jimaging-11-00013-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Combined Input Deep Learning Pipeline for Embryo Selection for In Vitro Fertilization Using Light Microscopic Images and Additional Features.用于体外受精胚胎选择的联合输入深度学习管道,使用光学显微镜图像和附加特征
J Imaging. 2025 Jan 7;11(1):13. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11010013.
2
Embryo Selection for IVF using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Light Microscopic Images of Embryo and Additional Factors.基于胚胎和其他因素的光镜图像的机器学习技术对 IVF 胚胎进行选择。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023 Jul;2023:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340767.
3
BlastAssist: a deep learning pipeline to measure interpretable features of human embryos.BlastAssist:一个用于测量人类胚胎可解释特征的深度学习流水线。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Apr 3;39(4):698-708. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae024.
4
Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF.开发一种基于人工智能的评估模型,用于通过体外受精期间光学显微镜拍摄的静态图像预测胚胎活力。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):770-784. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa013.
5
Generative artificial intelligence to produce high-fidelity blastocyst-stage embryo images.生成式人工智能生成高保真囊胚期胚胎图像。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1197-1207. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae064.
6
Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?胚胎学家在评估囊胚着床概率时的意见一致:数据驱动的预测是否是解决胚胎评估主观性的方法?
Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2275-2290. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac171.
7
An interpretable artificial intelligence approach to differentiate between blastocysts with similar or same morphological grades.一种用于区分形态学等级相似或相同的囊胚的可解释人工智能方法。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf066.
8
Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.通过人工智能与胚胎学家进行胚胎选择:一项系统综述。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023.
9
A Robust Approach to Early Glaucoma Identification from Retinal Fundus Images using Dirichlet-based Weighted Average Ensemble and Bayesian Optimization.一种基于狄利克雷加权平均集成和贝叶斯优化从眼底图像中早期识别青光眼的稳健方法。
Curr Med Imaging. 2025;21:e15734056335762. doi: 10.2174/0115734056335762250128095107.
10
Artificial intelligence system for outcome evaluations of human in vitro fertilization-derived embryos.人工智能系统用于评估人类体外受精胚胎的结局。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Aug 20;137(16):1939-1949. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003162. Epub 2024 Jul 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining Factors Influencing The Successful Embryo Transfer and Pregnancy during The Frozen Cycle of Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.影响冷冻周期受精过程中胚胎移植成功及妊娠的决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Fertil Steril. 2024 Oct 30;18(4):352-361. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.2009998.1532.
2
Embryo Selection for IVF using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Light Microscopic Images of Embryo and Additional Factors.基于胚胎和其他因素的光镜图像的机器学习技术对 IVF 胚胎进行选择。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023 Jul;2023:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340767.
3
Deep learning for embryo evaluation using time-lapse: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.
基于延时摄影的胚胎评估的深度学习:诊断试验准确性的系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov;229(5):490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.027. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Morphokinetic parameters of mouse oocyte meiotic maturation and cumulus expansion are not affected by reproductive age or ploidy status.小鼠卵母细胞减数分裂成熟和卵丘扩展的形态动力学参数不受生殖年龄或倍性状态的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 May;40(5):1197-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02779-y. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study.从回顾性研究中评估人类囊胚的活产预测模型的开发和评估。
Elife. 2023 Feb 22;12:e83662. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83662.
6
Quantitative morphokinetic parameters identify novel dynamics of oocyte meiotic maturation and cumulus expansion†.定量形态动力学参数可识别卵母细胞减数分裂成熟和卵丘扩展的新动态。
Biol Reprod. 2022 Oct 11;107(4):1097-1112. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac139.
7
Stain-free detection of embryo polarization using deep learning.使用深度学习进行胚胎极化的无标记检测。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 14;12(1):2404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05990-6.
8
Robust and generalizable embryo selection based on artificial intelligence and time-lapse image sequences.基于人工智能和延时图像序列的稳健且可推广的胚胎选择。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0262661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262661. eCollection 2022.
9
Blastocyst score, a blastocyst quality ranking tool, is a predictor of blastocyst ploidy and implantation potential.囊胚评分是一种囊胚质量排名工具,是囊胚倍性和着床潜力的预测指标。
F S Rep. 2020 Sep 28;1(2):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.05.004. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
Development of deep learning algorithms for predicting blastocyst formation and quality by time-lapse monitoring.通过延时监测预测囊胚形成和质量的深度学习算法的开发。
Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 26;4(1):415. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01937-1.