• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种基于人工智能的评估模型,用于通过体外受精期间光学显微镜拍摄的静态图像预测胚胎活力。

Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF.

作者信息

VerMilyea M, Hall J M M, Diakiw S M, Johnston A, Nguyen T, Perugini D, Miller A, Picou A, Murphy A P, Perugini M

机构信息

Laboratory Operations, Ovation Fertility, Austin, TX 78731, USA.

IVF Laboratory, Texas Fertility Center, Austin, TX 78731, USA.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):770-784. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa013.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/deaa013
PMID:32240301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7192535/
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Can an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model predict human embryo viability using images captured by optical light microscopy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

We have combined computer vision image processing methods and deep learning techniques to create the non-invasive Life Whisperer AI model for robust prediction of embryo viability, as measured by clinical pregnancy outcome, using single static images of Day 5 blastocysts obtained from standard optical light microscope systems.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Embryo selection following IVF is a critical factor in determining the success of ensuing pregnancy. Traditional morphokinetic grading by trained embryologists can be subjective and variable, and other complementary techniques, such as time-lapse imaging, require costly equipment and have not reliably demonstrated predictive ability for the endpoint of clinical pregnancy. AI methods are being investigated as a promising means for improving embryo selection and predicting implantation and pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: These studies involved analysis of retrospectively collected data including standard optical light microscope images and clinical outcomes of 8886 embryos from 11 different IVF clinics, across three different countries, between 2011 and 2018.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The AI-based model was trained using static two-dimensional optical light microscope images with known clinical pregnancy outcome as measured by fetal heartbeat to provide a confidence score for prediction of pregnancy. Predictive accuracy was determined by evaluating sensitivity, specificity and overall weighted accuracy, and was visualized using histograms of the distributions of predictions. Comparison to embryologists' predictive accuracy was performed using a binary classification approach and a 5-band ranking comparison.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The Life Whisperer AI model showed a sensitivity of 70.1% for viable embryos while maintaining a specificity of 60.5% for non-viable embryos across three independent blind test sets from different clinics. The weighted overall accuracy in each blind test set was >63%, with a combined accuracy of 64.3% across both viable and non-viable embryos, demonstrating model robustness and generalizability beyond the result expected from chance. Distributions of predictions showed clear separation of correctly and incorrectly classified embryos. Binary comparison of viable/non-viable embryo classification demonstrated an improvement of 24.7% over embryologists' accuracy (P = 0.047, n = 2, Student's t test), and 5-band ranking comparison demonstrated an improvement of 42.0% over embryologists (P = 0.028, n = 2, Student's t test).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The AI model developed here is limited to analysis of Day 5 embryos; therefore, further evaluation or modification of the model is needed to incorporate information from different time points. The endpoint described is clinical pregnancy as measured by fetal heartbeat, and this does not indicate the probability of live birth. The current investigation was performed with retrospectively collected data, and hence it will be of importance to collect data prospectively to assess real-world use of the AI model.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These studies demonstrated an improved predictive ability for evaluation of embryo viability when compared with embryologists' traditional morphokinetic grading methods. The superior accuracy of the Life Whisperer AI model could lead to improved pregnancy success rates in IVF when used in a clinical setting. It could also potentially assist in standardization of embryo selection methods across multiple clinical environments, while eliminating the need for complex time-lapse imaging equipment. Finally, the cloud-based software application used to apply the Life Whisperer AI model in clinical practice makes it broadly applicable and globally scalable to IVF clinics worldwide.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Life Whisperer Diagnostics, Pty Ltd is a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company, Presagen Pty Ltd. Funding for the study was provided by Presagen with grant funding received from the South Australian Government: Research, Commercialisation and Startup Fund (RCSF). 'In kind' support and embryology expertise to guide algorithm development were provided by Ovation Fertility. J.M.M.H., D.P. and M.P. are co-owners of Life Whisperer and Presagen. Presagen has filed a provisional patent for the technology described in this manuscript (52985P pending). A.P.M. owns stock in Life Whisperer, and S.M.D., A.J., T.N. and A.P.M. are employees of Life Whisperer.

摘要

研究问题

基于人工智能(AI)的模型能否使用光学显微镜拍摄的图像预测人类胚胎的生存能力?

总结答案

我们结合了计算机视觉图像处理方法和深度学习技术,创建了非侵入性的Life Whisperer AI模型,用于通过临床妊娠结局来稳健预测胚胎生存能力,该模型使用从标准光学显微镜系统获得的第5天囊胚的单张静态图像。

已知信息

体外受精(IVF)后的胚胎选择是决定后续妊娠成功的关键因素。训练有素的胚胎学家进行的传统形态动力学分级可能主观且存在差异,而其他辅助技术,如延时成像,需要昂贵的设备,并且尚未可靠地证明对临床妊娠终点的预测能力。人工智能方法正在作为改善胚胎选择以及预测着床和妊娠结局的一种有前景的手段进行研究。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:这些研究涉及对回顾性收集的数据进行分析,包括来自三个不同国家11家不同IVF诊所的8886个胚胎的标准光学显微镜图像和临床结局,时间跨度为2011年至2018年。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:使用已知临床妊娠结局(通过胎儿心跳测量)的静态二维光学显微镜图像对基于人工智能的模型进行训练,以提供妊娠预测的置信度评分。通过评估敏感性、特异性和总体加权准确性来确定预测准确性,并使用预测分布的直方图进行可视化。使用二元分类方法和5级排名比较来与胚胎学家的预测准确性进行比较。

主要结果及机遇的作用

在来自不同诊所的三个独立盲测集中,Life Whisperer AI模型对存活胚胎的敏感性为70.1%,同时对非存活胚胎保持60.5%的特异性。每个盲测集中的加权总体准确性>63%,存活和非存活胚胎的综合准确性为64.3%,表明该模型具有稳健性和可推广性,超出了偶然预期的结果。预测分布显示正确和错误分类的胚胎有明显区分。存活/非存活胚胎分类的二元比较显示,与胚胎学家的准确性相比提高了24.7%(P = 0.047,n = 2,Student's t检验),5级排名比较显示比胚胎学家提高了42.0%(P = 0.028,n = 2,Student's t检验)。

局限性、注意事项:此处开发的人工智能模型仅限于分析第5天的胚胎;因此,需要进一步评估或修改该模型以纳入来自不同时间点的信息。所描述的终点是通过胎儿心跳测量的临床妊娠,这并不表明活产的概率。当前的调查是使用回顾性收集的数据进行的,因此前瞻性收集数据以评估人工智能模型在现实世界中的应用将很重要。

研究结果的更广泛影响

与胚胎学家的传统形态动力学分级方法相比,这些研究表明在评估胚胎生存能力方面预测能力有所提高。Life Whisperer AI模型的卓越准确性在临床环境中使用时可能会提高IVF的妊娠成功率。它还可能有助于在多个临床环境中实现胚胎选择方法的标准化,同时无需复杂的延时成像设备。最后,用于在临床实践中应用Life Whisperer AI模型的基于云的软件应用程序使其广泛适用于全球各地的IVF诊所并具有全球可扩展性。

研究资金/竞争利益:Life Whisperer Diagnostics,Pty Ltd是母公司Presagen Pty Ltd的全资子公司。该研究的资金由Presagen提供,并获得了南澳大利亚政府的研究、商业化和创业基金(RCSF)的资助。Ovation Fertility提供了“实物”支持和胚胎学专业知识以指导算法开发。J.M.M.H.、D.P.和M.P.是Life Whisperer和Presagen的共同所有者。Presagen已为本文所述技术提交了临时专利(专利号52985P待批)。A.P.M.拥有Life Whisperer的股票,S.M.D.、A.J.、T.N.和A.P.M.是Life Whisperer的员工。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/84d54e5b8d58/deaa013f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/a76097f95fbd/deaa013f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/b658727e9585/deaa013f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/07bf60f2fda6/deaa013f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/a76be8fbbbde/deaa013f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/900fe9f7b33e/deaa013f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/5b67b12d72cd/deaa013f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/84d54e5b8d58/deaa013f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/a76097f95fbd/deaa013f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/b658727e9585/deaa013f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/07bf60f2fda6/deaa013f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/a76be8fbbbde/deaa013f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/900fe9f7b33e/deaa013f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/5b67b12d72cd/deaa013f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a1/7192535/84d54e5b8d58/deaa013f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF.开发一种基于人工智能的评估模型,用于通过体外受精期间光学显微镜拍摄的静态图像预测胚胎活力。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):770-784. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa013.
2
Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.基于体外受精过程中多个成像系统的囊胚图像,开发一种人工智能模型,用于预测人类胚胎整倍体的可能性。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1746-1759. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac131.
3
Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?胚胎学家在评估囊胚着床概率时的意见一致:数据驱动的预测是否是解决胚胎评估主观性的方法?
Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2275-2290. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac171.
4
A hybrid artificial intelligence model leverages multi-centric clinical data to improve fetal heart rate pregnancy prediction across time-lapse systems.一种混合人工智能模型利用多中心临床数据,改善跨时间 lapse 系统的胎儿心率妊娠预测。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Apr 3;38(4):596-608. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead023.
5
Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.通过人工智能与胚胎学家进行胚胎选择:一项系统综述。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023.
6
BlastAssist: a deep learning pipeline to measure interpretable features of human embryos.BlastAssist:一个用于测量人类胚胎可解释特征的深度学习流水线。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Apr 3;39(4):698-708. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae024.
7
Testing an artificial intelligence algorithm to predict fetal heartbeat of vitrified-warmed blastocysts from a single image: predictive ability in different settings.测试一种人工智能算法,通过单张图像预测玻璃化冷冻复苏囊胚的胎儿心跳:不同环境下的预测能力。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Oct 1;39(10):2240-2248. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae178.
8
Generative artificial intelligence to produce high-fidelity blastocyst-stage embryo images.生成式人工智能生成高保真囊胚期胚胎图像。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1197-1207. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae064.
9
Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer.深度学习作为一种预测工具,用于在延时孵育和囊胚转移后预测妊娠的胎儿心脏。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):1011-1018. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez064.
10
Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potential.卵裂期胚胎自动分类算法的临床验证:对囊胚形成、整倍体、着床和活产潜能的分析。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Jun 1;38(6):1060-1075. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead058.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning methods to forecasting human embryo development in time-lapse videos.用于预测延时视频中人类胚胎发育的深度学习方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0330924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330924. eCollection 2025.
2
Correlation of fetal heartbeat outcome after Day 3 or Day 5 single embryo transfer of morphologically selected embryos with an annotation-free deep learning scoring system: Results from a multi-center study.形态学筛选胚胎第3天或第5天单胚胎移植后胎儿心跳结局与无注释深度学习评分系统的相关性:一项多中心研究结果
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03570-x.
3
Use of time-lapse technology and artificial intelligence in the embryology laboratory: an updated review.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic grading of human blastocysts from time-lapse imaging.从延时成像中自动分级人类胚胎。
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Dec;115:103494. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103494. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
2
Deep Learning Fundus Image Analysis for Diabetic Retinopathy and Macular Edema Grading.深度学习眼底图像分析在糖尿病视网膜病变和黄斑水肿分级中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):10750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47181-w.
3
Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization.深度学习有助于在体外受精后对人类囊胚进行可靠的评估和筛选。
延时技术和人工智能在胚胎学实验室中的应用:最新综述
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025 Jul 30;29(2):338-350. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20250019.
4
Machine learning and microfluidic integration for oocyte quality prediction.用于卵母细胞质量预测的机器学习与微流体集成
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 22;15(1):26532. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11810-4.
5
Blastocyst selection through an interpretable artificial intelligence method versus traditional morphology grading: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.通过可解释的人工智能方法与传统形态学分级进行囊胚选择:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):e099631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099631.
6
Analysis of factors influencing clinical pregnancy rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.冻融胚胎移植周期中影响临床妊娠率的因素分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 25;16:1551530. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1551530. eCollection 2025.
7
Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Ray of Hope for Infertility.辅助生殖技术:不孕症患者的一线希望。
ACS Omega. 2025 May 23;10(22):22347-22365. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c01643. eCollection 2025 Jun 10.
8
Study Protocol: Evaluation of AI-Driven Grading Compared to Manual Grading in Predicting Embryo Viability and Successful Implantation and Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF Using Static Microscopic Images.研究方案:在使用静态显微镜图像预测体外受精中胚胎活力、成功着床及临床妊娠结局方面,将人工智能驱动的分级与人工分级进行比较的评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S956-S959. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_386_25. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
9
Semen HPV and IVF: insights from infection prevalence to embryologic outcomes.精液中的人乳头瘤病毒与体外受精:从感染率到胚胎学结局的见解
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03513-6.
10
Deep learning classification integrating embryo images with associated clinical information from ART cycles.将胚胎图像与辅助生殖周期中的相关临床信息相结合的深度学习分类
Sci Rep. 2025 May 21;15(1):17585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02076-x.
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Apr 4;2:21. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0096-y. eCollection 2019.
4
Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer.深度学习作为一种预测工具,用于在延时孵育和囊胚转移后预测妊娠的胎儿心脏。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):1011-1018. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez064.
5
Population and fertility by age and sex for 195 countries and territories, 1950-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.1950-2017 年 195 个国家和地区按年龄和性别划分的人口和生育率:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1995-2051. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32278-5. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.与临床体外受精中的传统方法相比,延时成像在胚胎培养和选择方面是否有良好的结果?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析和系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178720. eCollection 2017.
7
Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.胚胎学家在挑选单个第5天胚胎进行移植时的观察者间和观察者内一致性:一项多中心研究。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):307-314. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew330. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
8
Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability.人类胚胎植入前活力的诊断。
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):727-47. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu064. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
Biochemical pregnancy during assisted conception: a little bit pregnant.辅助生殖过程中的生化妊娠:有点像怀孕了。
J Clin Med Res. 2013 Aug;5(4):269-74. doi: 10.4021/jocmr1008w. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
10
Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage.在胚胎基因组激活之前对人类胚胎进行非侵入性成像可预测胚胎发育至囊胚阶段。
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):1115-21. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1686. Epub 2010 Oct 3.