• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于嵌入的语义分析方法:对量表所操作化的心理概念中冗余检测的初步研究

An Embedding-Based Semantic Analysis Approach: A Preliminary Study on Redundancy Detection in Psychological Concepts Operationalized by Scales.

作者信息

Huang Zhen, Long Yitian, Peng Kaiping, Tong Song

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Wuhan Britain-China School, Wuhan 430000, China.

出版信息

J Intell. 2025 Jan 16;13(1):11. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13010011.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence13010011
PMID:39852420
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11766606/
Abstract

As psychological research progresses, the issue of concept overlap becomes increasing evident, adding to participant burden and complicating data interpretation. This study introduces an Embedding-based Semantic Analysis Approach (ESAA) for detecting redundancy in psychological concepts, which are operationalized through their respective scales, using natural language processing techniques. The ESAA utilizes OpenAI's text-embedding-3-large model to generate high-dimensional semantic vectors (i.e., embeddings) of scale items and applies hierarchical clustering to group semantically similar items, revealing potential redundancy. Three preliminary experiments evaluated the ESAA's ability to (1) identify semantically similar items, (2) differentiate semantically distinct items, and (3) uncover overlap between scales of concepts known for redundancy issues. Additionally, comparative analyses assessed the ESAA's robustness and incremental validity against the advanced chatbots based on GPT-4. The results demonstrated that the ESAA consistently produced stable outcomes and outperformed all evaluated chatbots. As an objective approach for analyzing relationships between concepts operationalized as scales, the ESAA holds promise for advancing research on theory refinement and scale optimization.

摘要

随着心理学研究的进展,概念重叠问题日益明显,这增加了参与者的负担并使数据解释变得复杂。本研究引入了一种基于嵌入的语义分析方法(ESAA),用于检测心理概念中的冗余,这些概念通过各自的量表进行操作化,使用自然语言处理技术。ESAA利用OpenAI的text-embedding-3-large模型生成量表项目的高维语义向量(即嵌入),并应用层次聚类对语义相似的项目进行分组,揭示潜在的冗余。三个初步实验评估了ESAA在以下方面的能力:(1)识别语义相似的项目,(2)区分语义不同的项目,以及(3)发现已知存在冗余问题的概念量表之间的重叠。此外,比较分析评估了ESAA相对于基于GPT-4的先进聊天机器人的稳健性和增量效度。结果表明,ESAA始终产生稳定的结果,并且优于所有评估的聊天机器人。作为一种分析作为量表操作化的概念之间关系的客观方法,ESAA有望推动理论完善和量表优化的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/566a/11766606/f31ba2cd6206/jintelligence-13-00011-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/566a/11766606/f31ba2cd6206/jintelligence-13-00011-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/566a/11766606/f31ba2cd6206/jintelligence-13-00011-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
An Embedding-Based Semantic Analysis Approach: A Preliminary Study on Redundancy Detection in Psychological Concepts Operationalized by Scales.一种基于嵌入的语义分析方法:对量表所操作化的心理概念中冗余检测的初步研究
J Intell. 2025 Jan 16;13(1):11. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13010011.
2
Use of word and graph embedding to measure semantic relatedness between Unified Medical Language System concepts.使用词和图嵌入来衡量统一医学语言系统概念之间的语义相关性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Oct 1;27(10):1538-1546. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa136.
3
Semantic search helper: A tool based on the use of embeddings in multi-item questionnaires as a harmonization opportunity for merging large datasets - A feasibility study.语义搜索助手:一种基于在多项目问卷中使用嵌入作为合并大型数据集的协调机会的工具——一项可行性研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 20;68(1):e8. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1808.
4
Multi-Ontology Refined Embeddings (MORE): A hybrid multi-ontology and corpus-based semantic representation model for biomedical concepts.多本体精炼嵌入模型(MORE):一种基于混合多本体和语料库的生物医学概念语义表示模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Nov;111:103581. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103581. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
ARCH: Large-scale Knowledge Graph via Aggregated Narrative Codified Health Records Analysis.ARCH:通过聚合叙事编码健康记录分析构建大规模知识图谱
medRxiv. 2023 May 21:2023.05.14.23289955. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.14.23289955.
7
Comparing neural language models for medical concept representation and patient trajectory prediction.比较用于医学概念表示和患者轨迹预测的神经语言模型。
Artif Intell Med. 2025 May;163:103108. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103108. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
8
A simple clustering approach to map the human brain's cortical semantic network organization during task.一种在任务期间绘制人类大脑皮质语义网络组织的简单聚类方法。
Neuroimage. 2025 Apr 1;309:121096. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121096. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
9
The Semantic Scale Network: An online tool to detect semantic overlap of psychological scales and prevent scale redundancies.语义量表网络:一种在线工具,用于检测心理量表的语义重叠,防止量表冗余。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jun;25(3):380-392. doi: 10.1037/met0000244. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
10
Optimizing biomedical information retrieval with a keyword frequency-driven prompt enhancement strategy.基于关键词频率驱动的提示增强策略优化生物医学信息检索
BMC Bioinformatics. 2024 Aug 27;25(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05902-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Statistics is not measurement: The inbuilt semantics of psychometric scales and language-based models obscures crucial epistemic differences.统计学并非测量:心理测量量表和基于语言的模型的内在语义掩盖了关键的认知差异。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 26;16:1534270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534270. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological measures aren't toothbrushes.心理测量工具可不是牙刷。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Oct 17;1(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00026-9.
2
Measuring the menu, not the food: "psychometric" data may instead measure "lingometrics" (and miss its greatest potential).衡量的是菜单,而非食物:“心理测量”数据或许反而衡量的是“语言测量”(并错失其最大潜力)。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 21;15:1308098. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308098. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluating the Big Five as an organizing framework for commonly used psychological trait scales.
评估大五人格作为常用心理特质量表的组织框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;122(4):749-777. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000395. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science.计算社会科学中的解释与预测融合。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7866):181-188. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
The Semantic Scale Network: An online tool to detect semantic overlap of psychological scales and prevent scale redundancies.语义量表网络:一种在线工具,用于检测心理量表的语义重叠,防止量表冗余。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jun;25(3):380-392. doi: 10.1037/met0000244. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
6
Gratitude and the brain: Trait gratitude mediates the association between structural variations in the medial prefrontal cortex and life satisfaction.感恩与大脑:特质感恩在中前额皮质结构变异与生活满意度之间起中介作用。
Emotion. 2020 Sep;20(6):917-926. doi: 10.1037/emo0000617. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
7
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
8
Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature.《坚毅研究文献的元分析综合》
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Sep;113(3):492-511. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000102. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals.坚毅:对长期目标的坚持不懈和热情。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1087-101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.
10
Biases in the interpretation and use of research results.研究结果解读与应用中的偏差。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:259-87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259.