Jarnig Gerald, Kerbl Reinhold, van Poppel Mireille N M
Institute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, LKH Hochsteiermark, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Sports (Basel). 2025 Jan 2;13(1):5. doi: 10.3390/sports13010005.
Balance is a relevant indicator of physical fitness and correlates with intellectual abilities. Due to limited resources, however, balance tests are underrepresented in fitness checks. To develop an effective field test to assess static balance with minimal cost, little spatial requirement and short testing time, a cross-sectional pilot study was conducted in three different school types (primary school, secondary school, and high school) and the reliability, objectivity and validity of the novel Austrian Balance Check (ABC) were assessed, with the generation of age- and gender-specific reference values. Tests were carried out with participants from regular school classes (RSC) and elite sports school classes (ESC). A total of 1005 participants were included (age range: 6.2 to 19.8 years). Participants in RSC (ICC = 0.92, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.93) showed excellent values, and those in ESC (ICC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.93) had good to excellent values in the reliability test. Objectivity was excellent in both groups (RSC (ICC = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99); ESC (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99)). A gold standard comparison using an electronic force plate showed a strong negative correlation: participants with high overall ABC scores showed less movement on the force plate (parameters of the center of pressure: surface area (ρ = -0.61), mean velocity (ρ = -0.65) and path length (ρ = -0.65). The test duration of ABC was significantly ( < 0.001) shorter compared with an established balance test. ABC offers potential benefits by allowing field-based static balance testing in large groups with low cost, minimal time and spatial requirements as well as high reliability, objectivity and validity.
平衡是身体健康的一个相关指标,且与智力能力相关。然而,由于资源有限,平衡测试在体能检查中所占比例较低。为了开发一种有效的现场测试方法,以最低成本、最小空间需求和最短测试时间来评估静态平衡,在三种不同类型的学校(小学、初中和高中)进行了一项横断面试点研究,并评估了新型奥地利平衡测试(ABC)的可靠性、客观性和有效性,同时生成了按年龄和性别划分的参考值。测试对象为普通学校班级(RSC)和精英体育学校班级(ESC)的学生。共纳入1005名参与者(年龄范围:6.2至19.8岁)。RSC组参与者在可靠性测试中表现出优异的值(组内相关系数(ICC)=0.92,95%置信区间0.90至0.93),ESC组参与者的值为良好至优异(ICC = 0.89,95%置信区间0.85至0.93)。两组的客观性都非常好(RSC组(ICC = 0.99,95%置信区间0.98至0.99);ESC组(ICC = 0.98,95%置信区间0.96至0.99))。使用电子测力台进行的金标准比较显示出强烈的负相关:ABC总分高的参与者在测力台上的移动较少(压力中心参数:表面积(ρ = -0.61)、平均速度(ρ = -0.65)和路径长度(ρ = -0.65))。与一项既定的平衡测试相比,ABC的测试时间显著更短(<0.001)。ABC通过允许在大群体中进行基于现场的静态平衡测试,具有成本低、时间和空间需求最小以及可靠性高和客观性和有效性高等潜在优势。