Schwan T G, Thompson D, Nelson B C
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985 Mar;34(2):372-9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1985.34.372.
Roof rats (Rattus rattus) in southern California are rarely involved with plague epizootics and murine typhus. Little evidence exists implicating these rodents as sources of human infection. This might be explained by the absence of fleas capable of transmitting these 2 diseases. From February 1981 through January 1982, roof rats were live-trapped and examined for fleas each month in 4 areas of Los Angeles County. Two other areas were trapped for 9 and 3 months respectively. Areas sampled were in or near the suburban-wilderness fringe where plague and murine typhus occur, and where roof rats coexist with a variety of wild and domestic mammals and humans. From 1,206 roof rats, 827 fleas belonging to eight species were collected. Leptopsylla segnis (54%) and Nosopsyllus fasciatus (39%) were the most abundant and together comprised 93% of all fleas. Xenopsylla cheopis was not found. The relative abundance and diversity of fleas on roof rats varied considerably between areas, making it difficult to predict flea diversity and abundance in unsurveyed areas where similar conditions exist. However, the overall low flea indices and the absence of X. cheopis help to explain why roof rats in Los Angeles County are rarely involved with plague and murine typhus.
南加州的黑家鼠(Rattus rattus)很少引发鼠疫流行和鼠型斑疹伤寒。几乎没有证据表明这些啮齿动物是人类感染源。这可能是因为缺乏能够传播这两种疾病的跳蚤。从1981年2月到1982年1月,每月在洛杉矶县的4个区域对黑家鼠进行活体捕捉并检查跳蚤。另外两个区域分别捕捉了9个月和3个月。采样区域位于鼠疫和鼠型斑疹伤寒发生的城郊荒野边缘或附近,且黑家鼠与各种野生和家养哺乳动物以及人类共存。从1206只黑家鼠身上收集到了属于8个物种的827只跳蚤。缓慢细蚤(Leptopsylla segnis,占54%)和具带病蚤(Nosopsyllus fasciatus,占39%)数量最多,二者共占所有跳蚤的93%。未发现印鼠客蚤(Xenopsylla cheopis)。不同区域黑家鼠身上跳蚤的相对丰度和多样性差异很大,这使得难以预测存在类似条件的未调查区域的跳蚤多样性和丰度。然而,总体较低的跳蚤指数以及印鼠客蚤的缺失有助于解释为何洛杉矶县的黑家鼠很少引发鼠疫和鼠型斑疹伤寒。