Suppr超能文献

远程粮食安全研究项目:运用本土研究视角

Remote Food Security Research Project: Applying an Indigenist Research Lens.

作者信息

Chan Ellie, Deen Caroline, Thompson Kani, Stubbs Emma, Webb Amanda, Baghbanian Abdolvahab, Cadet-James Yvonne

机构信息

Public Health, Central Australian Aboriginal Congress, Alice Springs, Northwest Territories, Australia.

School of Public Health, the University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jan;36(1):e954. doi: 10.1002/hpja.954.

Abstract

This paper aimed to reflect on how Rigney's model of Indigenist research informed the research design of a project which explored community-led solutions to improve food security in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. The project was conducted in partnership with two Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs); Apunipima Cape York Health Council (Apunipima) and Central Australian Aboriginal Congress (Congress), communities in Central Australia and Cape York, Queensland and researchers from the University of Queensland, Monash University, Dalhousie University and Menzies School of Health Research. On reflection the principles of Indigenist research were evident providing a means of resistance to oppression through Indigenous stakeholders being in control of research to address social determinants, in this case food security. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander world views, lived experiences and knowledges were embedded in the research and informed governance, implementation and knowledge translation. ACCHOs and communities gained a political voice through advocacy and actions at the local, state and national levels. The development of a Community Framework led by ACCHOs and community stakeholders to address food security serves to talk to the three principles of 'Resistance, Political Integrity and Privileging Indigenous Voices'.

摘要

本文旨在反思里格尼的本土研究模式如何为一个项目的研究设计提供信息,该项目探索了由社区主导的解决方案,以改善偏远的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区的粮食安全。该项目是与两个原住民社区控制卫生组织(ACCHOs)合作开展的,即阿普尼皮马约克角卫生委员会(Apunipima)和澳大利亚中部原住民大会(Congress),以及澳大利亚中部和昆士兰州约克角的社区,还有来自昆士兰大学、莫纳什大学、达尔豪斯大学和孟席斯健康研究学院的研究人员。经过反思,本土研究的原则很明显,通过让原住民利益相关者掌控研究以解决社会决定因素(在本案例中为粮食安全),提供了一种抵抗压迫的手段。原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的世界观、生活经历和知识被融入到研究中,并为治理、实施和知识转化提供了信息。ACCHOs和社区通过在地方、州和国家层面的宣传和行动获得了政治话语权。由ACCHOs和社区利益相关者主导的旨在解决粮食安全问题的社区框架的制定,体现了“抵抗、政治诚信和重视原住民声音”这三项原则。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Evaluating Research Impact: The Development of a Research for Impact Tool.评估研究影响力:研究影响力工具的开发。
Front Public Health. 2016 Aug 25;4:160. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00160. eCollection 2016.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验