Najem A Z, Barillo D J, Spillert C R, Kerr J C, Lazaro E J
Am Surg. 1985 Apr;51(4):217-22.
In order to determine whether any clinical or laboratory findings were helpful in differentiating acute appendicitis (AP) from acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), this retrospective study was undertaken. Records of all female patients 12 to 50 years of age, undergoing laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of AP over the past 15 years, were reviewed and pertinent data recorded. In comparing AP (n = 106) with PID (n = 39), longer duration of symptoms, relationship of onset of pain to the menstrual cycle, and frequent requests for gynecological consultation distinguished the PID from the AP cases. Although complete reliance cannot be placed on any clinical or laboratory finding in differentiating AP from PID, the final satisfactory outcome justifies laparotomy when the diagnosis cannot be established by other means.
为了确定是否有任何临床或实验室检查结果有助于鉴别急性阑尾炎(AP)和急性盆腔炎(PID),开展了这项回顾性研究。回顾了过去15年中所有年龄在12至50岁之间、术前诊断为AP并接受剖腹手术的女性患者的记录,并记录了相关数据。在比较AP组(n = 106)和PID组(n = 39)时,症状持续时间较长、疼痛发作与月经周期的关系以及频繁寻求妇科会诊可将PID与AP病例区分开来。虽然在鉴别AP和PID时不能完全依赖任何临床或实验室检查结果,但当无法通过其他方法确诊时,剖腹手术最终令人满意的结果证明其合理性。